First Author |
Bias |
Authors’ Judgement |
Support for Judgement |
Honeybul 2017 [8] |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low Risk |
Each participant was randomised according to a random sequence generated by a random number software |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low Risk |
Group allocation concealed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
No information given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) |
Unclear Risk |
No information given |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) |
Low Risk |
No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low Risk |
All outcome data reported |
Other bias |
Low Risk |
Similar baseline characteristics in both groups. |
Honeybul 2018 [9] |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low Risk |
Each participant was randomised according to a random sequence generated by a random number software |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low Risk |
Group allocation concealed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) |
Unclear Risk |
No information given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) |
Unclear Risk |
No information given |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) |
Low Risk |
No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low Risk |
All outcome data reported |
Other bias |
Low Risk |
Similar baseline characteristics in both groups |