Table 3.
Modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment score
| Study first author | Selection |
Comparability of cases and controls | Independent blind assessment of outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of cases or cohort is consecutive or a series of cases | Selection of controls is from the community | |||
| Forssell, 198528 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nakamura, 198429 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hoagland, 198623 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Aronow, 198725 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Etchells, 199824 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Abe, 201326 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gamaza-Chulián, 202027 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A score of 0 is equal to a high risk of bias, and a score of 1 signifies a low risk of bias.