Table 2.

Multivariate analysis showing the role of different variables influencing FN outcome at different time (T2–T4).

T2
Nagelkerke R2	Model’s Fit	Goodness of Model
		Pearson	Variance
0.603	p < 0.05	p > 0.05	p > 0.05
Variable		Exp(B)	p-Value
Samii Grade		17.18	0.000
Cystic		−2.60	0.001
DT		7.035	0.000
FT-1		7.0	0.001

T3
Nagelkerke R2	Model’s Fit	Goodness of Model
		Pearson	Variance
0.645	p < 0.05	p > 0.05	p > 0.05
Variable		Exp(B)	p-Value
Samii grade			–
Cystic		−1.28	0.001
DT		7.10	0.000
FT-1		5.0	0.007

T4
Nagelkerke R2	Model’s Fit	Goodness of Model
		Pearson	Variance
0.603	p < 0.05	p > 0.05	p > 0.05
Variable		Exp(B)	p-Value
Samii grade			–
Cystic		−1.287	0.001
DT		5.79	0.000
FT-1		1.7	0.01

The bold values denote statistical significance a P < 0.05 level.