Table 3.

Association between FNOS class and FN function (HB grade) at different time (T1–T4).

a
Variable		HB T1
	Modality	HB “good”	HB “poor”
FNOS	A ≤ 4	42	5
	%	89.4	10.6
	B = 5–6	1	9
	%	10	90.0
	C ≥ 7	0	15
	%	0	100
Chi-Squared		Cramer’s V	p-Value
49.684		0.831	0.000

b
Variable		HB T2
	Modality	HB “good”	HB “poor”
FNOS	A ≤ 4	45	2
	%	95.7	4.3
	B = 5–6	4	6
	%	40	60
	C ≥ 7	0	15
	%	0	100
Chi-Squared		Cramer’s V	p-Value
60.800		0.851	0.000

c
Variable		HB T3
	Modality	HB “good”	HB “poor”
FNOS	A ≤ 4	47	0
	%	100	0
	B = 5–6	8	2
	%	80	20
	C ≥ 7	0	15
	%	0	100
Chi-Squared		Cramer’s V	p-Value
60.364		0.919	0.000

d
Variable		HB T4
	Modality	HB “good”	HB “poor”
FNOS	A ≤ 4	47	0
	%	100	0
	B = 5–6	9	4
	%	81.8	18.2
	C ≥ 7	0	15
	%	0	100
Chi-Squared		Cramer’s V	p-Value
63.129		0.936	0.000

Patients were divided in “good” and “poor” HB outcome (< 3 and ≥ 3, respectively).

The bold values denote statistical significance a P < 0.05 level.