Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;27(5):1204–1218. doi: 10.1177/13623613221117955

Table 2.

Fixed and random effects of the best age models for parent-reported empathy.

Emotion contagion Attention to others
Fixed effects Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] p value Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] p value
Intercept 0.34 (0.04) [0.27, 0.43] <0.001 1.35 (0.05) [1.25, 1.45] <0.001
Age −0.0008 (0.001) [−0.002, 0.0008] 0.348 0.001 (0.001) [−0.001, 0.003] 0.914
Group −0.42 (0.06) [−0.54, −0.30] <0.001
Random effects Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] Wald’s Z Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] Wald’s Z
Residual 0.05 (0.01) [0.04, 0.06] 10.05 0.06 (0.01) [0.05, 0.07] 10.69
Intercept 0.06 (0.01) [0.05, 0.08] 6.57 0.10 (0.01) [0.08, 0.13] 7.10
Prosocial actions Emotion acknowledgment
Fixed effects Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] p value Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] p value
Intercept 0.80 (0.05) [0.71, 0.90] <0.001 3.74 (.09) [3.57, 3.91] <0.001
Age 0.006 (0.001) [0.004, 0.008] <0.001 0.0035 (0.001) [0.001, 0.008] 0.002
Group −0.64 (0.06) [−0.75, −0.53] <0.001 −1.01 (0.10) [−1.21, −0.80] <0.001
Random effects Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] Wald’s Z Estimates (SE) CI [low, high] Wald’s Z
Residual 0.06 (0.01) [0.05, 0.07] 10.49 0.16 (0.02) [0.14, 0.19] 10.81
Intercept 0.10 (0.01) [0.07, 0.13] 6.79 0.33 (0.04) [0.25, 0.42] 7.58

SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval.