Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2022 Dec 12;130(5):533–541. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.12.008

Table 3.

Visual acuity by each testing method and by clinical visual acuity subgroups

Visual Acuity Clinical VA
Overall 20/40 or better 20/50 or worse

No. of eyes
  N 1016 640 376
Clinical VA, letter score (converted from Snellen fraction) a
  Mean (SD) 68.6 (17.1) 78.7 (5.8) 51.3 (16.1)
  Median (IQR) 75 (60, 80) 80 (75, 85) 58 (45, 65)
Protocol VA, letter score (eETDRS)
  Mean (SD) 76.3 (15.6) 84.5 (7.0) 62.3 (16.3)
  Median (IQR) 82 (67, 87) 86 (82, 89) 64 (55, 71)
VA difference (protocol - clinical), letter score b
  Mean (SD) 7.6 (9.6) 5.8 (6.6) 10.7 (12.6)
  Median (IQR) 7 (2, 13) 5 (2, 10) 10 (2, 20)
VA difference (protocol - clinical), N (%)
  Protocol ≥15 letters better 204 (20%) 60 (9%) 144 (38%)
  Protocol 10–14 letters better 169 (17%) 121 (19%) 48 (13%)
  Protocol 5–9 letters better 256 (25%) 197 (31%) 59 (16%)
  Same ± 4 letters 316 (31%) 229 (36%) 87 (23%)
  Protocol 5–9 letters worse 40 (4%) 19 (3%) 21 (6%)
  Protocol 10–14 letters worse 17 (2%) 11 (2%) 6 (2%)
  Protocol ≥15 letters worse 14 (1%) 3 (<1%) 11 (3%)
a

Converted letter score = 85 + 50 × log10(Snellen fraction), rounded to the nearest letter, or = 0 for Snellen fractions <20/800.

b

VA difference outliers were truncated at the raw overall mean ± 3 SD (7.7 ± 3 × 10.3).