Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;10:20543581231181026. doi: 10.1177/20543581231181026

Table 1.

Overview of the Association Between Frailty and Functional Status Instruments and Mortality, Classified by Patient Population.

Author, year N Tool Follow-up Analysis a Main findings
CKD non-dialysis patients
 Frailty Tools, overall frailty or individual domains
  Delgado, 2015 812 Frailty, self-report [modified Fried and Woods] 17 years b Not Frail [reference (ref)] vs:
Intermediately Frail: aHR 1.43 (1.11-1.83) c
Frail: aHR 1.48 (1.08-2.00) c
Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Pugh, 2016 283 Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) [adapted] 3 years Per 1-category increase in CFS: aHR 1.35 (1.16-1.57) d ↑ frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Ali, 2018 104 Combined PRISMA/Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) 1.7 years e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 4.27 (1.22-14.9) f Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Vezza, 2019 115 Frailty Index 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aOR 2.32 (0.23-23.12) c
Per unit increase: aOR 1.17 (1.05-1.31) c
↑ frailty was associated with ↑ odds of mortality.
  Meulendijks, 2015 63 Groningen Frailty Indicator 1 year Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: RR 3.23 (1.02-10.2) g Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Androga, 20176 1101 Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Index (ASMI) 9.4 yearsb,e No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.24 (0.98-1.58) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kruse, 2020 351 Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) 7 years Normal (ref) vs:
Men
Class I Sarcopenia: aHR 1.13 (0.82-1.57) c
Class II Sarcopenia: aHR 1.20 (0.82-1.74) c
Women
Class I Sarcopenia: aHR 0.92 (0.74-1.15) c
Class II Sarcopenia: aHR 0.98 (0.69-1.38) c
Sarcopenia in men and women was not associated with mortality.
  Pereira, 201595 287 Sarcopenia Method A (Midarm Muscle Circumference [MAMC] + Handgrip Strength [HGS]) 3.3 years e No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.62 (0.69-3.82) c Sarcopenia Method A (MAMC + HGS) was not an independent predictor of mortality.
  Pereira, 201595 287 Sarcopenia Method B (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA]) + HGS) 3.3 years e No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.80 (0.78-4.17) c Sarcopenia Method B (SGA + HGS) was not an independent predictor of mortality.
  Pereira, 201595 287 Sarcopenia Method C (Skeletal Muscle Mass Index [SMI]) + HGS) 3.3 years e No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 3.02 (1.30-7.05) c Sarcopenia Method C (SMI + HGS) was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Roshanravan, 2013104 322 Gait Speed 3 years b >0.8m/s (ref) vs ≤0.8m/s: aHR 2.45 (1.09-5.54) c
Per 0.1 m/s slower: aHR 1.26 (1.09-1.47) c
Slower gait speed was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Clarke, 201921 431 Gait Speed [self-report] 3.6 yearsb,e ≥ 3 mph (ref) vs < 3 mph: aHR 2.70 (1.41-5.00)c,h A faster walking pace was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Roshanravan, 2013104 309 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 3 years b ≥350m (ref) vs <350m: aHR 2.82 (1.17-6.92) c
Per 100m decrease: aHR 1.32 (0.96-1.85)c,i
Shorter walk distance (<350m) was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Roshanravan, 2013104 362 TUG 3 years b Fast (<12s) (ref) vs Slow (≥12s): aHR 1.81 (0.92-3.56) c
Per 1s slower: aHR 1.08 (1.01-1.14) c
Slower TUG (per 1s decrement) was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Roshanravan, 2013104 381 HGS 3 years b Stronger (ref) vs Weak Grip: aHR 1.30 (0.71-2.37) c
Per 1kg decrease: aHR 1.01 (0.98-1.04)c,i
Lower HGS was not associated with mortality.
  Watson, 2020 89 Leg Extension Strength 3.3 years j Per 1kg decrease: aHR 1.04 (0.96-1.12) h Muscle strength was not associated with mortality.
  Navaneethan, 2014 2145 Leisure Time Physical Activity (LTPA) 4.5 person yearse,j ≥450 metabolic equivalent (MET)/week (ref) vs <450 MET/week: aHR 1.36 (1.00-1.85) c
Per log unit MET/week decrease: aHR 1.03 (1.00-1.05) h
LTPA below the recommended level was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Androga, 20176 1101 LTPA 9.4 yearsb,e <500 MET-min/week (ref) vs 0 MET-min/week: aHR 1.47 (1.11-1.96) h
500-2000 MET-min/week (ref) vs 0 MET-min/week: aHR 1.43 (1.05-1.96) h
>2000 MET-min/week (ref) vs 0 MET-min/week: aHR 1.59 (1.16-2.17) h
Activity level was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Rampersad, 2021 569 Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) 1194 days b Light activity (ref) vs Low activity: aHR 1.11 (0.74-1.69)c,h
Moderate to high activity (ref) vs Low activity: aHR 2.08 (1.18-3.70)c,h
Low physical activity was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Clarke, 201921 437 Walking 3.6 yearsb,e <1 walking hour/week (ref) vs 0 walking hours/week: aHR 2.08 (1.11-3.85)c,h
1-3 walking hours/week (ref) vs 0 walking hours/week: aHR 4.0 (1.75-9.09)c,h
≥3 walking hours/week (ref) vs 0 walking hours/week: aHR 2.08 (1.25-4.35)c,h
No walking was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
 Functional status tools
  Clarke, 201921 450 Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) 3.6 yearsb,e >19.2 summed METs (ref) vs ≤19.2 summed METs: aHR 1.96 (1.14-3.33)c,h
Per 1-unit decrease: aHR 1.03 (1.01-1.05)c,h
↓ physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Ritchie, 2014 1515 Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) 2.9 years b KPS = 100 (ref) vs:
KPS = 90: aHR 1.20 (0.94-1.52) c
KPS ≤ 80: aHR 1.80 (1.35-2.41) c
Lower KPS is associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
Incident dialysis patients
 Frailty Tools, overall frailty or individual domains
  McAdams-DeMarco, 2015 324 Fried Frailty Index 1 year Not Frail (ref) vs:
Intermediately Frail: RR 1.23 (0.53-2.83) g
Frail: RR 1.15 (0.48-2.74) g
Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Fried Frailty Index [modified low activity] 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 7.22 (2.47-21.13) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  López-Montes, 2020 117 Fried Frailty Index [modified low activity] 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.6 (0.9-7.9) c Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Johansen, 200748 2275 Johansen Frailty Criteria [modified Fried and Woods] 1 year Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.24 (1.60-3.15) Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Bao, 2012 1576 Frailty, self-report [modified Fried, Woods, Johansen] 2.9 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.57 (1.25-1.97) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Alfaadhel, 2015 372 CFS 1.7 years b Per 1-category increase: aHR 1.21 (1.02-1.43) c ↑ frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Clinical Impression [physician] 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 4.10 (1.19-14.14) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Geriatric Assessment 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.97 (1.19-7.45) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Groningen Frailty Indicator 1 year e Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: HR 1.71 (0.76-3.86) k Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Surprise Question 1 year e Surprised (ref) vs Not Surprised: HR 0.89 (0.33-2.39) k Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Isoyama, 201440 330 Sarcopenia 2.4 yearsb,e Appropriate muscle mass and strength (ref) vs Sarcopenia (low muscle mass and strength): aHR 1.93 (1.01-3.71) c Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Xu, 2020136 229 Sarcopenia (Lean Mass Index [LMI] + HGS) 3 yearse,j Normal HGS and LMI (ref) vs Sarcopenia (low HGS and LMI): aHR 2.49 (1.61-3.85) d Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 TUG 1 year e Not impaired (ref) vs Severely impaired: aHR 1.97 (0.80-4.85) c Impairment was not associated with mortality.
  Stenvinkel, 2002 169 HGS 3.1 yearse,j Per 1kg decrease:
Entire cohort: aHR 1.04 (0.99-1.08)d,h
Men: aHR 1.08 (1.03-1.12)d,h
Women: aHR 1.03 (0.96-1.11)d,h
In men, decreasing HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Hellberg, 201437 Right: 132
Left: 130
HGS 3.5 years b Per unit decrease:
Right hand: aHR 9.09 (0.99-100) h
Left hand: aHR 9.09 (1.35-50.0) h
Decreasing left HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Isoyama, 201440 330 HGS 2.4 yearsb,e Appropriate muscle strength (ref) vs Low muscle strength: aHR 1.79 (1.09-2.94) c
Per 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease: aHR 3.13 (1.75-5.56)c,h
Low muscle strength was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Xu, 2020136 327 HGS 3 yearse,j High (ref) vs Low: aHR 1.96 (1.35-2.84) d Low HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Hellberg, 201437 100 Isometric Quadriceps Strength 3.5 years b Per unit decrease:
Right leg: HR 1.27 (0.17-9.09)c,h
Left leg: HR 2.56 (0.28-25.0)c,h
Decreasing isometric quadriceps strength was not associated with mortality.
  Hellberg, 201437 Right: 103
Left: 104
Standing Heel Rise 3.5 years b Per unit decrease:
Right foot: aHR 1.32 (0.26-6.67) h
Left foot: aHR 3.13 (0.61-16.7) h
Decreasing heel raises was not associated with mortality.
  Hellberg, 201437 Right: 108
Left: 106
Toe Lift 3.5 years b Per unit decrease:
Right foot: HR 4.55 (0.69-33.3)c,h
Left foot: HR 5.26 (0.77-3.33)c,h
Decreasing toe lifts was not associated with mortality.
  Johansen, 200748 2275 SF-36 Vitality Scale 1 year Score ≥55 (ref) vs <55: aHR 1.30 (0.97-1.76) c Fatigue was not associated with mortality.
  Johansen, 200748 2275 Physical Activity 1 year Active (ref) vs Inactive: aHR 1.79 (1.42-2.25) c Inactivity was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
 Functional status tools
  Inaguma, 2016 1496 Barthel Index (BI) 3.3 years e High BI (score = 100) (ref) vs:
Middle BI (75≤BI<100): aHR 1.61 (1.07-2.41)
Low BI (<75): aHR 1.99 (1.46-2.70)
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Shum, 2014 157 Basic Activities of Daily Living 2.0 years b Independent (ref) vs Impaired: HR 2.11 (1.28-3.46) c Impaired activities of daily living was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Yazawa, 2016 7623 Functional Status—Ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 1 year Mild disability/none (ref) vs:
Moderate: aRR 1.83 (1.54-2.16) c
Severe: aRR 2.35 (1.97-2.81) c
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Shah, 2018 49645 Functional Status—Form CMS-2728 1.8 yearse,j Good functional status (ref) vs Poor functional status: aHR 1.28 (1.24-1.33) c Poor functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Wetmore, 2019 80284 Functional Status Score 0.5 years e Score ≤ 0 (high functional status) (ref):
Score 1-2: aOR 1.27 (1.20-1.34)
Score 3-4: aOR 1.41 (1.33-1.49)
Score 5-6: aOR 1.68 (1.54-1.84)
Score ≥ 7 (low functional status): aOR 1.67 (1.45-1.92)
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ odds of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Katz’ ADL 1 year e Not impaired (ref) vs Impaired: aHR 3.20 (1.45-7.06) c Impairment was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2019128 192 Lawton and Brody’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale 1 year e Not impaired vs Impaired [stratified by age, < or ≥ 80 years]:
P value: <.01 c
Impairment was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Hatakeyama, 2013 141 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) 10 years e ECOG-PS ≤1 (ref) vs >1: aHR 1.27 (1.08-1.49) Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  McClellan, 1991 294 KPS 479.6 days j Per 10-unit decrease: aHR 1.35 (1.1-1.64)c,h Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Chandna, 1999 292 KPS 5.3 years e Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.22 (1.10-1.34)c,d,h,i Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Utas, 2001 334 KPS 2.0 yearse,j aHR Not reported; P value: <.05 l Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Joly, 2003 101 KPS 1 year Normal Activity (KPS 80-100)/Requires Assistance (50-100) (ref) vs Dependent (10-40): aHR 2.34 (1.00-5.50)c,f Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Revuelta, 200475 293 KPS [modified] 771 days b Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.13 (0.86-1.48)c,f Decreasing functional status was not associated with mortality.
  Arai, 2014 202 Mobility—Criteria for Impaired Elderly 0.5 yearse,j Independent mobility before and after dialysis (ref) vs Independent before dialysis, but decline after dialysis: aHR 3.80 (1.02-14.1) d
Independent mobility before and after dialysis (ref) vs Impaired mobility before dialysis: aHR 4.94 (1.42-17.1) d
Independent mobility before dialysis (ref) vs Impaired mobility: aHR 2.76 (1.13-6.77) d
No decline in mobility after starting dialysis (ref) vs Decline: aHR 4.82 (1.72-13.5) d
Impaired mobility and declines in mobility were associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Knight, 2003 14815 SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) 1 year Score ≥50 (ref) vs:
≥40 to <50: aHR 1.17 (0.98-1.41) c
≥30 to <40: aHR 1.32 (1.11-1.57) c
≥20 to <30: aHR 1.62 (1.36-1.92) c
<20: aHR 1.97 (1.64-2.36) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.25 (1.18-1.33)
Impaired functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Revuelta, 200475 293 SF-36 PCS 771 days b Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.16 (0.78-1.71)c,f Decreasing functional status was not associated with mortality.
  Johansen, 200748 2275 SF-36 Physical Function (PF) Scale 1 year Score ≥75 (ref) vs <75: aHR 2.07 (1.33-3.24) c Lower PF is associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Argyropoulos, 2009 491 SF-36 PF Scale 3.5 years j Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.05 (1.01-1.11)c,h,i Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
Chronic dialysis patients
 Frailty Tools, overall frailty or individual domains
  McAdams-DeMarco, 2013 146 Fried Frailty Index 3.0 years b Not Frail (ref) vs:
Intermediately Frail: aHR 2.65 (1.05-6.67) c
Frail: aHR 2.87 (1.17-7.03) c
Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Johansen, 2016 49 728 Fried Frailty Index 1.7 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.78 (1.15-2.80) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Yadla, 2017 205 Fried Frailty Index 1 year Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: HR 0.75 (0.30-1.88) c Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Sy, 2019 746 Fried Frailty Index 2 years Not Frail (ref) vs Frail (at baseline): aHR 1.40 (1.07-1.83) c
Not Frail (ref) vs Frail (at any point during follow-up): aHR 1.53 (1.05-2.23) c
Frailty at baseline was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
Developing frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Fried Frailty Index [modified low activity] 3.3 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.03 (0.97-4.24) Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Jafari, 2020 97 Fried Frailty Index [modified low activity] 1 year Not Frail/Pre-Frail (ref) vs Frail: RR 2.11 (0.78-5.72) g Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Johansen, 201649 728 Fried Frailty Index [modified slowness, weakness, exhaustion] 1.7 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.66 (1.06-2.60) c Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kang, 201755 1250 (HD); 366 (PD) Johansen Frailty Criteria [modified weight loss] 489 days j (HD)
467 days j (PD)
HD
Not Frail/Pre-Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.35 (1.36-4.05)
PD
Not Frail/Pre-Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.75 (0.68-4.49)
Frailty in hemodialysis patients was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lee, 201770 1658 Johansen Frailty Criteria [modified weight loss] 1.4 yearsb,e Not Frail (ref) vs:
Pre-Frail: aHR 1.01 (0.48-2.12)
Frail: aHR 2.08 (1.04-4.16)
Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Bancu, 2017 320 Fried Frailty Index + Dialysis Time/Week 1 year Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: RR 1.77 (0.71-4.42) g Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Fried Frailty Index [modified low activity] + Clinical Impression [physician] 3.3 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.03 (0.97-5.08) Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Kamijo, 201853 119 CFS [adapted] 589 days j Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 9.83 (1.80-53.7) Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Clinical Impression [nurse] 3.3 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.92 (0.88-4.18) Frailty was not associated with mortality
  Brar, 201915 109 Clinical Impression [physician] 3.3 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 2.32 (1.10-4.89) Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Shimoda, 2018 314 Combined Score 6.5 years Low score (<5) (ref) vs High score (≥5): aHR 3.63 (1.73-7.59) c
Per 1-point increase: aHR 1.28 (1.14-1.43) c
Higher Combined Score was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Jiang, 2020 1424026 Frailty (Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups) Not reported Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aOR 2.46 (2.41-2.51) Frailty was associated with ↑ odds of death while hospitalized for any reason.
  Ng, 2016 193 Frailty Score 1.9 yearse,j aHR: 1.21 (0.94-1.54)d,l Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Chan, 2020 267 Frailty Score 2 years Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.79 (1.09-2.94) d Frailty was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Jegatheswaran, 2020 261 FRAIL Questionnaire 1.5 years e Not Frail (ref) vs:
Pre-Frail: RR 1.30 (0.68-2.48) g
Frail: RR 1.26 (0.53-2.99) g
Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Chao, 202020 33 Laboratory Deficit-Based Frailty Index-1 2.7 yearse,j Not Frail vs Frail:
P value: .01 c
Frailty was associated with mortality.
  Chao, 202020 33 Laboratory Deficit-Based Frailty Index-2 2.7 yearse,j Not Frail vs Frail:
P value: .07 c
Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Short Physical Performance Battery 3.3 years b Not Frail (ref) vs Frail: aHR 1.54 (0.63-3.77) Frailty was not associated with mortality.
  Kang, 201356 534 ASMI 3.7 yearse,j Middle/High ASMI (ref) vs Low ASMI:
Male: aHR 1.21 (0.74-1.98) d
Female: aHR 1.52 (0.88-2.64) d
Low ASMI was not associated with mortality.
  Rymarz, 2018 48 Lean Tissue Index 2.5 yearse,j No Sarcopenia vs Sarcopenia:
P value: .055 c
Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kang, 201356 534 Limb/Trunk Lean Mass Ratio (LTLM) 3.7 yearse,j Middle/High LTLM (ref) vs Low LTLM:
Male: aHR 1.88 (1.24-2.84)c,d
Female: aHR 2.20 (1.36-3.54)c,d
Low LTLM was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Noori, 2010 792 MAMC 730 days b Highest quartile (Q4) (ref) vs Lowest quartile (Q1): aHR 1.59 (0.94-2.63)c,h
Q3 (ref) vs Q1: aHR 1.45 (0.93-2.22)c,h
Q2 (ref) vs Q1: aHR 1.16 (0.78-1.72)c,h
Lower MAMC was not associated with mortality.
  Jin, 2017 117 Relative Appendicular Skeletal Muscle (RASM) 5.0 yearse,j No Sarcopenia (at 1 year) vs Sarcopenia (at 1 year): aHR 2.31 (1.11-4.81) d Low RASM was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lin, 2020 271 SARC-F 2 years SARC-F <1 (ref) vs SARC-F ≥1: aHR 2.87 (1.11-7.38) c
Per 1-point increase: aHR 1.12 (0.98-1.29) c
High SARC-F score was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Mori, 2019 308 Sarcopenia 6.3 yearse,j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.31 (0.81-2.10) Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Giglio, 201832 170 Sarcopenia [modified] 1.4 yearsb,e No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 2.09 (1.05-4.20) Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Yamamoto, 2021138 542 Sarcopenia (Creatinine Index [CrI] + Gait Speed) 3.0 years b No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 4.20 (2.38-7.41) Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Yamamoto, 2021138 542 Sarcopenia (CrI + HGS) 3.0 years b No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 3.79 (2.09-6.87) Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Souweine, 2020114 187 Sarcopenia (CrI + Maximal Voluntary Force) 2.0 yearse,j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.60 (0.76-3.35) d Sarcopenia was not associated with risk of mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 643 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/Height² + Weakness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 2.23 (0.99-5.00) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 643 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/Body Weight (BW) + Weakness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.24 (0.63-2.43) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 643 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/Body Surface Area (BSA) + Weakness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.53 (0.84-2.78) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 643 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/body mass index (BMI) + Weakness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.65 (0.88-3.08) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 644 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/Height² + Slowness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 2.92 (1.33-6.41) c Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 644 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/BW + Slowness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.56 (0.85-2.83) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 644 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/BSA + Slowness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 1.46 (0.83-2.58) c Sarcopenia was not associated with mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 644 Sarcopenia (Muscle Mass/BMI + Slowness) 1.9 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 2.51 (1.41-4.66) c Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kamijo, 201853 119 Sarcopenia (RASM + HGS/Gait Speed) 500 days No Sarcopenia vs Sarcopenia:
P value: <.001 c
Sarcopenia was associated with mortality.
  Lin, 202073 126 Sarcopenia (SMI + HGS/Gait Speed) 3 years No Sarcopenia vs Sarcopenia:
P value: .037 c
Sarcopenia was associated with mortality.
  Ren, 2016 131 Sarcopenia Method C (SMI + HGS) 1 year No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: RR 12.5 (1.20-131.4) g Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kim, 201757 142 Sarcopenia Status 4.3 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 6.99 (1.84-26.5) Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Song, 2020 88 Sarcopenia Status 5.2 years j No Sarcopenia (ref) vs Sarcopenia: aHR 2.72 (1.11-6.63) Sarcopenia was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Weight Loss 3.3 years b No weight loss (ref) vs Weight loss: aHR 1.34 (0.57-3.14) Weight loss was not associated with mortality.
  Kutner, 2015 742 Gait Speed 703 days b ≥0.6m/s (ref) vs:
<0.6 m/s: aHR 2.17 (1.19-3.98) c
Unable to perform walk: aHR 6.93 (4.01-11.9) c
Per 0.1 m/s decrease: aHR 1.17 (1.05-1.31)
Slower walk speed and being unable to walk was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 645 Gait Speed 1.9 years j Normal (ref) vs Slow: aHR 2.25 (1.36-3.74) c
Per 1 SD decrease in Gait Speed: aHR 1.35 (0.97-1.85)c,h
Slow walking speed was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kamijo, 201853 119 Gait Speed 589 days j Normal (ref) vs Slow: aHR 19.3 (0.82-454.1) Gait speed was not associated with mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Gait Speed 3.3 years b Normal (ref) vs Slow: aHR 1.28 (0.60-2.73) Slowness was not associated with mortality.
  Lin, 202073 126 Gait Speed 3 years Normal vs Slow:
P value: .020 c
Slow gait speed was associated with mortality.
  Yamamoto, 2021138 542 Gait Speed 3.0 years b Per 1 SD (0.3 m/s) decrease: aHR 1.67 (1.56-1.79) h Decreasing gait speed was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kohl, 2012 52 6MWT 12 years Per 100m decrease: aHR 1.89 (1.35-2.7)d,h Shorter walk distance was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Torino, 2014 296 6MWT 3.3 years b Per 100m decrease: aHR 1.76 (1.34-2.39)c,h,i Shorter walk distance was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Shi, 2017 145 6MWT 1.9 yearsb,e Long (ref) vs Short 6MWT: RR 2.89 (1.1-7.64) g Shorter walk distance was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Valenzuela, 2019125 30 6MWT 1.5 years e Long (ref) vs Short: RR 5.0 (1.31-19.07) c Shorter walk distance was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Wang, 2005 180 HGS 2.5 yearse,j Per 1kg decrease: aHR 1.05 (1.01-1.09)c,h Decreasing HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Matos, 2014 443 HGS 2.8 yearsb,e High (ref) vs Low:
Entire cohort: aHR 2.81 (1.62-4.88) c
Men: aHR 3.57 (1.79-7.10) c
Women: aHR 2.48 (0.87-7.03) c
Low HGS in the entire cohort and in males only was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Vogt, 2016 265 HGS 1.1 yearse,j High (ref) vs Low: aHR 2.04 (1.12-3.7)d,h Low HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kim, 201757 142 HGS 4.3 years j Appropriate Strength (ref) vs Low Strength: aHR 5.65 (1.99-16.0) Low HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kittiskulnam, 201758 645 HGS 1.9 years j Normal (ref) vs Weak: aHR 1.68 (1.01-2.79) c
Per 1 SD decrease in HGS: aHR 1.49 (1.06-2.13)c,h
Weak HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Giglio, 201832 170 HGS 1.4 yearsb,e Appropriate Strength (ref) vs Low Strength: aHR 1.84 (0.92-3.68) Low HGS was not associated with mortality.
  Kamijo, 201853 119 HGS 589 days j Normal (ref) vs Low: aHR 0.95 (0.77-1.17) HGS was not associated with mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 HGS 3.3 years b Normal (ref) vs Weak: aHR 2.82 (1.36-5.83) Weak HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Valenzuela, 2019125 30 HGS 1.5 years e High (ref) vs Low: RR 3.0 (1.01-8.95) c Low HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lin, 202073 126 HGS 3 years Normal vs Low:
P value: .014 c
Low HGS was associated with mortality.
  Yamamoto, 2021138 542 HGS 3.0 years b Per 1 SD (8.7 kg) decrease: aHR 1.96 (1.85-2.08) h Decreasing HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Zhang, 2020 174 Biceps Muscle Strength 1 year e High (ref) vs Low: aHR 7.14 (1.28-50.0)c,h
Per 1kg decrease: aHR 1.32 (1.10-1.59)c,h
Low biceps muscle strength was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Souweine, 2020114 187 Dynapenia 2.0 yearse,j No Dynapenia (ref) vs Dynapenia: aHR 2.99 (1.18-7.61) d Low muscle strength was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Matsuzawa, 2014 190 Lower extremity muscle strength 3.0 yearsb,e ≥40% (ref) vs <40%: aHR 2.73 (1.14-6.52) Low lower extremity strength was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Valenzuela, 2019125 30 30-Second Chair Stand 1.5 years e More repetitions (ref) vs Less repetitions: RR 3.0 (1.01-8.95) c Fewer sit-to-stand repetitions were associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—Exhaustion 3.3 years b No exhaustion (ref) vs Exhaustion: aHR 1.16 (0.60-2.22) Exhaustion was not associated with mortality.
  Koyama, 2010 788 Fukuda Fatigue Scale 2.2 yearsb,e Normal (ref) vs Highly fatigued: HR Not reported; P value >.05 c Fatigue was not associated with mortality.
  Ducharlet, 201928 102 Palliative Care Outcome Scale Symptoms (POS-S) Renal—Weakness 254 days j No weakness/low energy (ref) vs Weakness/low energy: HR 2.0 (0.4-7.8) c Weakness or low energy was not associated with mortality.
  Mapes, 200379 10030 SF-36 Vitality Scale Not reported Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.09 (1.07-1.12) ↑ fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Takaki, 2005117 490 SF-36 Vitality Scale 986 days j Per 1 SD decrease: aHR Not reported; P value >.05 ↑ fatigue was not associated with mortality
  Jhamb, 2009 705 SF-36 Vitality Scale 1065 days b Score >55 (ref) vs Score ≤55: aHR 1.33 (1.04-1.72)c,h Fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Jhamb, 2011 1798 SF-36 Vitality Scale 2.8 years j High vitality (Q4) (ref) vs:
Q3: aHR 1.07 (0.84-1.35) c
Q2: aHR 1.19 (0.98-1.45) c
Low vitality (Q1): aHR 1.37 (1.12-1.67) c
↑ fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Bossola, 2015 115 SF-36 Vitality Scale 3.6 yearse,j Low fatigue (score ≥65) (ref) vs:
≥50 to <65: aHR 3.23 (1.23-8.46) c
≥35 to <50: aHR 5.11 (2.01-13.0) c
High fatigue (score <35): aHR 5.29 (2.2-12.7) c
↑ fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2017127 714 SF-36 Vitality Scale 2 years Score >66 (ref) vs Score ≤66: aHR 1.37 (0.91-2.06) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.12 (1.03-1.21) i
↑ fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kalantar, 201952 753 SF-36 Vitality Scale 5 years High vitality (Q4) (ref) vs:
Q3: aHR 1.03 (0.66-1.63) c
Q2: aHR 1.00 (0.63-1.59) c
Low vitality (Q1): aHR 1.88 (1.29-2.74) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.11 (1.05-1.19)c,h
↑ fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Torino, 2019121 245 SF-36 Vitality Scale 2.2 years b Per unit decrease: aHR 1.09 (1.00-1.19)h,l Fatigue was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kurita, 2019 3667 SF-12 Vitality Scale 2.7 years b Energy a little of the time (ref) vs None of the time: aHR 1.00 (0.75-1.33)c,h
Energy some of the time (ref) vs None of the time: aHR 1.33 (1.04-1.69)c,h
Energy most of the time (ref) vs None of the time: aHR 1.52 (1.08-2.13)c,h
Energy all of the time (ref) vs None of the time: aHR 1.69 (0.84-3.45)c,h
Per 1-level lower energy level: aHR 1.16 (1.04-1.28)c,h
Lower energy was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kutner, 199765 348 Exercise Activity Score 7 years Per 3-unit shift toward less exercise: aOR 1.58 (CI, not reported); P value: .047 d Decreasing exercise activity was associated with ↑ odds of mortality.
  Tentori, 2010 20912 Exercise Frequency 1.7 years b Regular (≥1/week) (ref) vs Non-regular (<1/week): aHR 1.37 (1.28-1.45)c,h
Per decrease in each exercise frequency category: aHR 1.11 (1.09-1.14)c,h
Exercise frequency:
1/week (ref) vs Never or <1/week: aHR 1.22 (1.1-1.37)c,h
2-3/week (ref) vs Never or <1/week: aHR 1.39 (1.27-1.52)c,h
4-5/week (ref) vs Never or <1/week: aHR 1.37 (1.16-1.61)c,h
6-7/week (ref) vs Never or <1/week: aHR 1.45 (1.32-1.59)c,h
Low levels of physical activity were associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brar, 201915 109 PASE 3.3 years b Normal physical activity (ref) vs Low physical activity: aHR 1.81 (0.88-3.71) Low physical activity was not associated with mortality.
  Kang, 201754 1611 Physical Activity—World Health Organization Recommendations 500 days Active (ref) vs:
Intermediate: RR 1.09 (0.59-2.01) g
Inactive: RR 1.46 (0.84-2.54) g
Low levels of physical activity were not associated with mortality.
  Lopes, 2014 5763 Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity 1.6 years b Infrequently active (ref) vs Never/rarely active: aHR 1.12 (0.91-1.39)f,h
Sometimes active (ref) vs Never/rarely active: aHR 1.19 (0.95-1.49)f,h
Often active (ref) vs Never/rarely active (ref): aHR 1.23 (1.04-1.47)f,h
Very active (ref) vs Never/rarely active (ref): aHR 1.67 (1.3-2.13)f,h
Low levels of physical activity were associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Souweine, 2020114 187 Voorrips Score 2 yearse,j Per unit decrease: aHR 3.57 (1.39-9.09)d,h Decreased physical activity was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
 Functional status tools
  Anderson, 1990 44 Activity of Daily Living Score 0.41 patient yearse,j Score ≥9.6 (ref) vs Score <9.6: aHR 2.6 (1.7-4.0) d Lower ADL score was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Anderson, 1993 221 Activity of Daily Living Score 2.2 years e Score >8 (ref) vs Score ≤8: aHR 2.0 (1.6-2.6) Low functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Anderson, 1997 109 Activity of Daily Living Score 1.1 yeare,j Per 1-point lower: aHR 1.1 (1.04-1.15)d,h Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Watanabe, 2021 300 ADL Difficulty 4.8 years b Higher ADL (ref) vs Lower ADL: aHR 2.70 (1.57-4.64) c
Per 1-point decrease in ADL: aHR 1.05 (1.02-1.08)c,h
Lower ADL was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kang, 201755 1250 (HD); 366 (PD) Disability 489 days j (HD)
467 days j (PD)
HD
No Disability (ref) vs Disability: aHR 2.13 (1.20-3.78)
PD
No Disability (ref) vs Disability: aHR 0.97 (0.40-2.36)
Disability in HD patients was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lee, 201770 1658 Disability 1.4 yearsb,e No Disability (ref) vs Disability: HR 2.47 (1.59-3.82) c Disability associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kutner, 1994 287 Functional Limitations Score 2.8 years e Severe impairment vs Moderate to No impairment in functional status x time: aHR Not reported; P value: .01 Severely low functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kutner, 199765 348 Functional Limitations Score 7 years Functional status moderately or severely impaired vs no impairment: aOR Not reported; P value not reported d Greater functional impairment at baseline was associated with ↑ odds of mortality. This effect varied based on patient age. An interaction between baseline functional impairment and age was reported.
  Sood, 2011 1286 Katz’ ADL 7.5 days b Per 1-point change toward more impaired: aOR 1.16 (1.11-1.22) Increased impairment in functional status was associated with ↑ odds of in-hospital mortality.
  Shavit, 2014 56 Katz’ ADL 2 years Unimpaired (ref) vs Impaired: aOR Not reported; P value: .002 f Functional impairment was associated with ↑ odds mortality.
  Bossola, 201614 132 Katz’ ADL 7.5 years e No functional impairment (ref) vs Impaired: aHR 2.47 (1.07-5.67) c Functional impairment was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Farrokhi, 2013 167 4-Item Essential ADL Score 5 years Score 0 (no disability) (ref) vs:
Score 1: aHR 2.18 (0.50-9.46) d
Score 2: aHR 1.61 (0.35-7.26) d
Score 3: aHR 2.50 (0.56-11.2) d
Score 4 (severe disability): aHR 12.5 (2.44-65.0) d
Severely low functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Bossola, 201614 132 Lawton and Brody’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale 7.5 years e No functional impairment (ref) vs Impaired: aHR 0.80 (0.36-1.76) c Functional impairment was not associated with mortality.
  Jassal, 2016 7226 Functional Status Score (ADL & IADL) 1.4 yearsb,e Functionally independent (score = 13) (ref) vs:
Score 11 to <13: aHR 1.24 (1.03-1.48) c
Score 8 to <11: aHR 1.65 (1.38-1.99) c
Score <8: aHR 2.37 (1.92-2.94) c
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Tennankore, 2019 2593 Functional Status Score (ADL & IADL) 1.2 yearsb,e Independent (score = 13) (ref) vs:
Score 11 to <13: aHR 1.57 (1.13-2.20)
Score 8 to <11: aHR 3.23 (2.27-4.60)
Score <8: aHR 4.01 (2.44-6.61)
Increased functional impairment was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Matsuzawa, 2019 817 Functional Status Score (ADL & IADL) 704 days b No decline (ref) vs Decline: aHR 2.68 (1.31-5.50)
No decline (ref) vs Decline in at least 1/13 functional status tasks: aHR 2.81 (1.25-6.33)
A decline in Functional Status Score was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
A decline in at least 1 Functional Status Score task was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  McClellan, 1992 2701 KPS 1 year Score ≥ 70 (ref) vs Score <70: aHR 1.68 (1.32-2.13) Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Ifudu, 1998 319 KPS [modified] 3 years Score ≥70 (ref) vs Score <70: aHR Not reported; P value: .14 c Decreasing functional status was not associated with mortality.
  Freedman, 2001 3442 KPS [modified] 5 years Highest functional status category (ref) vs:
Second: aHR 0.9 (0.7-1.1) c
Third: aHR 1.1 (0.9-1.4) c
Lowest: aHR 1.6 (1.2-2.0) c
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Ducharlet, 201928 102 POS-S Renal-Mobility 254 days j Normal mobility (ref) vs Low mobility: HR 4.6 (1.2-17.2) c Low mobility was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Roberts, 1976 641 State of Health 5 years Health Status 1 (ref) vs:
Health Status 2: RR 1.21 (1.00-1.46) g
Health Status 3: RR 1.57 (1.27-1.94) g
Health Status 4: RR 1.58 (0.96-2.43) g
Health Status 5: RR not compared due to small n
Lower functional status was associated with ↑ risk of death.
  DeOreo, 1997 1000 SF-36 PCS 531 days j Per 10-unit decrease: aHR 1.25 (1.02-1.49)h,i Decreasing PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lowrie, 2003 13952 SF-36 PCS 0.5 years e Per 10-unit decrease: aOR 1.22 (1.20-1.25)h,i Lower functional status was associated with ↑ odds of mortality.
  Mapes, 200379 10030 SF-36 PCS Not reported Score >46 (ref) vs:
Score 39-46: aHR 1.03 (0.85-1.25) c
Score 33-38: aHR 1.34 (1.10-1.63) c
Score 26-32: aHR 1.50 (1.24-1.80) c
Score <25: aHR 1.81 (1.49-2.20) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.25 (1.20-1.30) c
Decreasing PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Takaki, 2005117 490 SF-36 PCS 986 days j Per 1 SD decrease: aHR Not reported; P value >.05 Decreased PCS was not associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Lacson, 201068 44395 SF-36 PCS 1 year Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.28 (1.25-1.31)h,i Lower PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Peng, 2010 888 SF-36 PCS 7 years Highest scores (Q4) (ref) vs:
Q3: aHR 1.07 (0.70-1.65)
Q2: aHR 1.69 (1.13-2.53)
Lowest scores (Q1): aHR 1.85 (1.24-2.76)
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.34 (1.10-1.63)h,i
Decreased PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Peng, 2013 816 SF-36 PCS 7 years Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.22 (1.10-1.48)h,i Decreased PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Turkmen, 2014 63 SF-36 PCS 7 years aHR Not reported; P value >.05d,l PCS was not associated with mortality.
  Kang, 201755 1250 (HD); 366 (PD) SF-36 PCS 489 days j (HD)
467 days j (PD)
HD
High PCS tertile (ref) vs Middle/Low PCS tertile: aHR 1.01 (1.00-1.02) h
PD
High PCS tertile (ref) vs Middle/Low PCS tertile: aHR 1.03 (1.01-1.05) h
Decreased PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kalantar, 201952 753 SF-36 PCS 5 years Q4 (high score) (ref) vs:
Q3: aHR 0.98 (0.61-1.59) c
Q2: aHR 1.54 (0.99-2.39) c
Q1 (low score): aHR 2.30 (1.53-3.47) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.47 (1.27-1.72)c,h
The lowest quartile of PCS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brito, 202016 670 SF-36 PCS 9 years Per 1-point increase: aHR Not reported; P value >.05 Physical function was not associated with risk of mortality.
  Lacson, 201068 44395 SF-12 PCS 1 year Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.28 (1.24-1.31)h,i Decreasing physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Hall, 2019 1368 SF-12 PCS 151 days b Per 10-point change m : aHR 0.82 (0.66-1.1)c,i A change m in physical function was not associated with mortality.
  Mapes, 200379 10030 SF-36 PF Scale Not reported Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.10 (1.08-1.11) Decreasing physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Takaki, 2005117 490 SF-36 PF Scale 986 days j Per 1 SD decrease: aHR Not reported; P value >.05 Decreasing physical function was not associated with mortality.
  Santos, 2012 161 SF-36 PF Scale 1 year e Per 10-unit decrease: HR 1.22 (1.04-1.44)c,h,i Decreasing physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  de Oliveira, 2016 76 SF-36 PF Scale 2 years Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.20 (1.04-1.38)d,h,i Decreased physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2017126 679 SF-36 PF Scale 2 years Good physical function vs:
Intermediate: RR 1.41 (0.87-2.26) g
Poor: RR 3.49 (2.31-5.27) g
Decreased physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  van Loon, 2017127 714 SF-36 PF Scale 2 years Score >66 (ref) vs Score ≤66: aHR 1.72 (1.02-2.73) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.14 (1.06-1.21) i
Decreased physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Kalantar, 201952 753 SF-36 PF Scale 5 years Q4 (high score) (ref) vs:
Q3: aHR 0.98 (0.61-1.57) c
Q2: aHR 1.04 (0.66-1.66) c
Q1 (low score): aHR 1.87 (1.21-2.87) c
Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.11 (1.05-1.18)c,h
Decreased physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Torino, 2019121 245 SF-36 PF Scale 2.2 years b Per unit decrease: aHR 1.14 (1.05-1.23)h,l Decreasing physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Brito, 202016 670 SF-36 PF Scale 9 years Per 10-point decrease: aHR 1.1 (1.0-1.1)h,i Physical function was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Fukuma, 2017 1376 SF-12 PF Scale 1 year Score 100 (highest function) (ref) vs:
Score 75: aOR 0.57 (0.23-1.42)
Score 50: aOR 0.66 (0.31-1.40)
Score 25: aOR 1.04 (0.47-2.29)
Score 0 (lowest function): aOR 2.48 (1.26-4.91)
Decreased physical function was associated with ↑ odds of mortality.
Other
 Frailty Tools, overall frailty or individual domains
  Nixon, 2020 450 CFS [adapted] 210 days b Per 1-point increase: aHR 2.15 (1.63-2.85) Each point increase in CFS score was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Dai, 2017 985 HGS 5 years e % HGS > 74.07 (ref) vs % HGS < 74.07: aRR 1.19 (1.13-1.25) c Lower HGS was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.
  Beddhu, 2009 Not reported LTPA 7 years j Active (ref) vs Inactive: aHR 2.27 (1.72-3.03)c,h
Insufficient (ref) vs Inactive: aHR 1.72 (1.27-2.38)c,h
Activity level was associated with ↑ risk of mortality.

Note. References are available in supplementary material; McClellan, 1991, KPS reported as 0-10, converted to 0-100. ADL = Activities of Daily Living; aHR = adjusted hazard ratio; aOR = adjusted odds ratio; aRR = adjusted relative risk; ASMI = Appendicular Skeletal Mass Index; BI = Barthel Index; BMI = body mass index; BSA = body surface area; BW = body weight; CFS = Clinical Frailty Scale; CI = 95% confidence interval; CKD = chronic kidney disease; CrI = Creatinine Index; DASI = Duke Activity Status Index; ECOG-PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HD = hemodialysis; HGS = handgrip strength; HR = unadjusted hazard ratio; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; LMI = Lean Mass Index; LTLM = Limb/Trunk Lean Mass Ratio; LTPA = Leisure Time Physical Activity; MAMC = midarm muscle circumference; MET = metabolic equivalent; OR = unadjusted odds ratio; PASE = Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly; PCS = Physical Component Summary; PD = peritoneal dialysis; PF = Physical Function; POS-S = Palliative Care Outcome Scale–Symptoms; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis; RASM = Relative Appendicular Skeletal Muscle; Ref = reference value; SGA = Subjective Global Assessment; SMI = Skeletal Muscle Mass Index; TUG = Timed Up-and-Go Test; RR = unadjusted relative risk; 6MWT = 6-Minute Walk Test.

a

All models adjusted for a minimum of age and sex, unless otherwise noted. Where a choice of models exists, the most fully adjusted model is presented.

b

Median.

c

Multiple adjusted models available.

d

Model not adjusted for sex.

e

Converted to years.

f

Model not adjusted for age or sex.

g

RR calculated from event data, or cumulative survival event data.

h

Scale inverted.

i

Scale change.

j

Mean.

k

Unadjusted model.

l

Reference group and comparator not reported, unit of measure not clearly reported.

m

Change defined as a clinically relevant decline or improvement.