Table 2.
Prevalence ratios (PRs) for skipping breakfast by socioeconomic statusa
Reference | Category | Main effect | Interaction | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR | 95% CI | p | PR | 95% CI | p | |||
Young adults (n = 2,179) | ||||||||
Socioeconomic status | ||||||||
EA | Higher | Lower | 1.21 | 1.09–1.36 | 0.001 | 1.20 | 1.04–1.39 | 0.014 |
SFS | Moderate | Poor | 1.15 | 1.03–1.27 | 0.009 | 1.14 | 1.01–1.29 | 0.035 |
EA × SFSb | 0.796 | |||||||
Middle-aged adults (n = 2,992) | ||||||||
Socioeconomic status | ||||||||
EA | Higher | Lower | 1.42 | 1.27–1.60 | < 0.001 | 1.44 | 1.25–1.66 | < 0.001 |
SFS | Moderate | Poor | 1.10 | 0.97–1.25 | 0.123 | 1.12 | 0.95–1.33 | 0.182 |
EA × SFSb | 0.743 | |||||||
Older adults (n = 3,184) | ||||||||
Socioeconomic status | ||||||||
EA | Higher | Lower | 1.02 | 1.00–1.05 | 0.095 | 1.29 | 1.04–1.60 | 0.020 |
SFS | Moderate | Poor | 1.04 | 1.00–1.07 | 0.032 | 1.61 | 1.18–2.19 | 0.002 |
EA × SFSb | 0.042 |
Abbreviations: PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; EA, educational attainment; SFS, subjective financial status
Bold values denote significant at α = 0.025 (0.05/2) by Bonferroni’s correction adjustment
ª Poisson regression model with robust variance. Dependent variable: skipping breakfast; Independent variable: socioeconomic status;
Covariates: sex, age, living arrangement, marital status, current work status, number of comorbidities, K6 and IADL (only for older adults)
b Overall test of interaction