Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;23:1230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16131-7

Table 2.

Prevalence ratios (PRs) for skipping breakfast by socioeconomic statusa

Reference Category Main effect Interaction
PR 95% CI p PR 95% CI p
Young adults (n = 2,179)
Socioeconomic status
EA Higher Lower 1.21 1.09–1.36 0.001 1.20 1.04–1.39 0.014
SFS Moderate Poor 1.15 1.03–1.27 0.009 1.14 1.01–1.29 0.035
EA × SFSb 0.796
Middle-aged adults (n = 2,992)
Socioeconomic status
EA Higher Lower 1.42 1.27–1.60 < 0.001 1.44 1.25–1.66 < 0.001
SFS Moderate Poor 1.10 0.97–1.25 0.123 1.12 0.95–1.33 0.182
EA × SFSb 0.743
Older adults (n = 3,184)
Socioeconomic status
EA Higher Lower 1.02 1.00–1.05 0.095 1.29 1.04–1.60 0.020
SFS Moderate Poor 1.04 1.00–1.07 0.032 1.61 1.18–2.19 0.002
EA × SFSb 0.042

Abbreviations: PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; EA, educational attainment; SFS, subjective financial status

Bold values denote significant at α = 0.025 (0.05/2) by Bonferroni’s correction adjustment

ª Poisson regression model with robust variance. Dependent variable: skipping breakfast; Independent variable: socioeconomic status;

Covariates: sex, age, living arrangement, marital status, current work status, number of comorbidities, K6 and IADL (only for older adults)

b Overall test of interaction