Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 25;23:421. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03114-8

Table 4.

Comparison of internal and marginal discrepancies (μm) between different groups

Internal discrepancy Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference P-Value
Lower Upper
Pair 1 Vita—Nacera 13.87500 8.48712 2.68386 7.80368 19.94632 0.001
Pair 2 Nacera—Zirconia -31.02500 5.10508 1.61437 -34.67695 -27.37305 0.000
Pair 3 Zirconia—PEKK 19.73750 5.61757 1.77643 15.71893 23.75607 0.000
Pair 4 Vita—PEKK 2.58750 7.32719 2.31706 -2.65405 7.82905 0.293
Pair 5 Vita—Zirconia -17.15000 7.55370 2.38869 -22.55359 -11.74641 0.000
Pair 6 Nacera—PEKK -11.28750 4.19327 1.32603 -14.28718 -8.28782 0.000
Marginal discrepancy Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference P-Value
Lower Upper
Pair 1 Vita – Zirconia -16.10000 15.68403 4.95973 -27.31968 -4.88032 0.010
Pair 2 Vita—PEKK 8.07500 14.43282 4.56406 -2.24962 18.39962 0.111
Pair 3 Vita—Nacera 4.17500 11.54704 3.65149 -4.08525 12.43525 0.282
Pair 4 Zirconia—PEKK 24.17500 4.45666 1.40932 20.98690 27.36310 0.000
Pair 5 Zirconia—Nacera 20.27500 7.98823 2.52610 14.56057 25.98943 0.000
Pair 6 PEKK—Nacera -3.90000 8.54010 2.70062 -10.00922 2.20922 0.183