Table 3.
Ref.
|
Study design
|
Study population (n)
|
Clinical indication
|
Access to GB
|
Technical success (%)
|
LAMS maldeployment (n)
|
LAMS type
|
Size of LAMS (mm)
|
LAMS flange misdeployed
|
Rescue therapy
|
Ngamruengphong et al[50], 2015 | Case report | 1 | Cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis | Duodenum | - | 1 | Hot Axios | - | Proximal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
Rajadurai et al[22], 2022 | Retrospective multicenter | 49 | - | Duodenum | 95.7 | 2 | Hot Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm; 15 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Closure of the defect with clip; palliation (no further endoscopic treatment) |
Cho et al[51], 2019 | Prospective single center | 22 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 95.5 | 1 | Spaxus | 10 mm × 20 mm | Proximal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
Walter et al[52], 2016 | Prospective multicenter | 30 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Stomach | 90 | 3 | Hot Axios | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS | ||
Irani et al[53], 2015 | Retrospective multicenter | 15 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Duodenum | 93 | 1 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
de la Serna-Higuera et al[54], 2013 | Prospective single center | 13 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Stomach | 84.6 | 1 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Closure of the defect with clip (no further endoscopic treatment) |
Dollhopf et al[55], 2017 | Retrospective multicenter | 75 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Stomach | 98.7 | 1 | Hot-Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm | Proximal | Surgery |
Teoh et al[56], 2017 | Retrospective multicenter | 59 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 96.6 | 1 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Surgery |
Mangiavillano et al[57], 2021 | Retrospective multicenter | 18 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 83.3 | 1 | Spaxus | Distal | Closure of the defect with clip followed by transpapillary stent placment | |
Teoh et al[29], 2021 | Retrospective multicenter | 27 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 88.9 | 2 | Spaxus | 10 mm × 10 mm; 16 | Proximal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
Higa et al[58], 2019 | Retrospective single center | 40 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 97.5 | 2 | Hot Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm; 15 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Redeployment of a new LAMS |
Garg et al[59], 2018 | Case report | 1 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Stomach | - | 1 | Hot Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
Torres Yuste et al[60], 2020 | Retrospective single center | 34 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 97.1 | 3 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm; 15 mm × 10 mm | Distal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS (2/3); double pig-tail plastic stent in LAMS (1/3) |
37 | - | 97.3 | 1 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm; 15 mm × 10 mm | Proximal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS | |||
James et al[61], 2019 | Retrospective multicenter | 15 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | Stomach | 93.3 | 1 | Axios | 10 mm × 10 mm; 15 mm × 10 mm | Proximal | Surgery |
Irani et al[62],2017 | Retrospective multicenter | 45 | Acute cholecystitis unfit for surgery | - | 97.8 | 1 | Axios | - | Distal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS |
Cho et al[63], 2020 | Retrospective multicenter | 36 | Acute cholecystitis, advanced malignancy unfit for surgery | - | 94.4 | 2 | Spaxus | - | Proximal | Stent-in-stent strategy using SEMS, emergent PTC |
SEMS: Self-expanding metal stent; LAMS: Lumen-apposing metal stent; PTC: Percutaneous cholecystostomy; GB: Gallbladder.