Table 1.
Sample Characteristics of Study 1 and Study 2
| Study 1 | Study 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention (N=160) | Control (N=164) | p | Intervention (N=58) |
Control (N=60) | p | |
| Age, Mean (SD) | 30.40 (9.65) | 29.37 (8.63) | .31 | 28.09 (6.3) | 28.03 (6.1) | 0.96 |
| Gender, N (%) | ||||||
| Male | 56 (35.00) | 61 (37.20) | 23 (39.67) | 24 (40.69) | ||
| Female | 104 (65.00) | 103 (62.80) | 34 (58.62) | 32 (54.24) | ||
| Othera | 0 | 0 | .68 | 1 (1.72) | 3 (5.08) | 0.58 |
| Race/Ethnicity Status, N (%) | ||||||
| Black/African American | 19 (11.88) | 17 (10.37) | 4 (6.90) | 6 (10.17) | ||
| European American | 64 (40.00) | 65 (39.63) | 21 (36.21) | 24 (40.68) | ||
| Hispanic/Latino | 12 (7.45) | 16 (9.76) | 5 (8.62) | 6 (10.17) | ||
| Asian | 59 (36.88) | 54 (32.93) | 18 (31.03) | 17 (28.81) | ||
| Other | 6 (3.75) | 12 (7.32) | .58 | 8 (13.79) | 4 (6.78) | 0.41 |
| Income, N (%) | ||||||
| Lower or equal to $39,999 | 100 (62.11) | 86 (52.44) | 28 (48.28) | 26 (43.33) | ||
| $40,000 to $79,999 | 37 (23.13) | 52 (31.71) | 17 (29.31) | 17 (28.33) | ||
| More than $80,000 | 22 (13.75) | 25 (15.24) | .29 | 13 (22.41) | 16 (25.67) | 0.89 |
| Employment, N (%) | ||||||
| Working full-time | 42 (26.25) | 51 (31.10) | 19 (32.76) | 23 (38.98) | ||
| Working part-time | 18 (11.25) | 15 (9.15) | 10 (17.24) | 14 (23.73) | ||
| Not employed or currently looking for jobs | 28 (17.50) | 29 (17.68) | 0 | 1(1.69) | ||
| Full-time/part time student | 70 (43.75) | 69 (42.07) | .54 | 4 (6.90) | 1(1.69) | 0.22 |
| Education, N (%) | ||||||
| GED, high school or lower than high school | 9 (5.63) | 11 (6.71) | 1(1.7) | 5 (8.5) | ||
| Some college or college degree | 95 (59.38) | 107 (65.24) | 46 (79.31) | 48 (80.0) | ||
| Graduate school | 56 (35.00) | 46 (28.05) | .40 | 11 (18.97) | 6(7.50) | 0.12 |
Note. Chi-square analyses were conducted to compare differences in categorical variables between the intervention and the control group. T-tests were conducted to compare differences in continuous variables between the intervention and the control group.
An “other” option was not included in Study 1