Table 2.
Effect |
Men
|
Women
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | p-value | 95% CI | B | SE | p-value | 95% CI | |
M3 Negative Affect (Model 1) | ||||||||
NA (M2) | 0.54 | 0.08 | <.001 | [0.38, 0.69] | 0.54 | 0.08 | <.001 | [0.38, 0.69] |
RA (M2) | 0.08 | 0.06 | .224 | [−0.05, 0.20] | 0.08 | 0.06 | .224 | [−0.05, 0.20] |
NQ (M2) | −0.03 | 0.01 | .007 | [−0.06, 0.01] | −0.03 | 0.01 | .007 | [−0.06, 0.01] |
RA X NQ (M2) | −0.08 | 0.04 | .035 | [−0.15, −0.01] | 0.00 | 0.03 | .863 | [−0.05, 0.05] |
Age (M2) | 0.00 | 0.00 | .930 | [−0.01, 0.01] | 0.00 | 0.00 | .930 | [−0.01, 0.01] |
Education (M2) | −0.07 | 0.02 | <.001 | [−0.11, −0.03] | −0.07 | 0.02 | <.001 | [−0.11, −0.03] |
Work Status (M2) | 0.34 | 0.12 | .007 | [0.09, 0.58] | 0.01 | 0.13 | .961 | [−0.24, 0.25] |
Income (M2) | 0.03 | 0.03 | .260 | [−0.02, 0.09] | 0.03 | 0.03 | .260 | [−0.02, 0.09] |
M3 Positive Affect (Model 2) | ||||||||
PA (M2) | 0.48 | 0.08 | <.001 | [0.31, 0.64] | 0.48 | 0.08 | <.001 | [0.31, 0.64] |
RA (M2) | 0.02 | 0.08 | .793 | [−0.14, 0.18] | 0.02 | 0.08 | .793 | [−0.14, 0.18] |
NQ (M2) | 0.04 | 0.02 | .004 | [0.01, 0.07] | 0.04 | 0.02 | .004 | [0.01, 0.07] |
RA X NQ (M2) | 0.01 | 0.03 | .729 | [−0.05, 0.07] | 0.01 | 0.03 | .729 | [−0.05, 0.07] |
Age (M2) | 0.00 | 0.00 | .414 | [0.00, 0.01] | 0.00 | 0.00 | .414 | [0.00, 0.01] |
Education (M2) | 0.03 | 0.02 | .063 | [−0.01, 0.07] | 0.03 | 0.02 | .063 | [−0.01, 0.07] |
Work Status (M2) | −0.06 | 0.10 | .586 | [−0.25, 0.14] | −0.06 | 0.10 | .586 | [−0.25, 0.14] |
Income (M2) | −0.05 | 0.03 | .111 | [−0.10, 0.01] | −0.05 | 0.03 | .111 | [−0.10, 0.01] |
Note. B = Unstandardized Coefficient, SE = Standard Error, CI = Confidence Interval, RA = Relationship Adjustment, NA = Negative Affect, NQ = Neighborhood Quality, PA = Positive Affect, M2 = MIDUS 2, and M3 = MIDUS 3. Significant associations are noted in bold.