Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2023 Feb 23;78(1):295–306. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000324

Table 3.

Predictive accuracy for mortality of cytolysin in comparison with established liver disease markers.

AUC Threshold Sens Spec Acc Prec PPV NPV
Cytolysin 0.82 detectable 0.75 0.89 0.78 0.95 0.95 0.53
FIB-4 0.69 6.53 0.82 0.71 0.80 0.92 0.92 0.50
ABIC 0.77 8.28 0.71 0.78 0.73 0.91 0.91 0.47
Maddrey’s DF 0.68 29.17 1.00 0.40 0.88 0.86 0.86 1.00
MELD 0.80 25.13 0.68 0.89 0.73 0.95 0.95 0.47

The best threshold was determined to maximize the youden index (= sensitivity + specificity) for each marker. Cytolysin n=37, FIB-4 n=35, ABIC n=37, Maddrey’s DF n=24, and MELD score n=37. ABIC, Age, serum bilirubin, INR, and serum creatinine score; acc, accuracy; AUC, area under the curve; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4 Index; INR, international normalized ratio; Maddrey’s DF, Maddrey’s discriminant function; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; pre, precision; sens, sensitivity; spec, specificity.