Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2023 Jan 11;39(3):557–564. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12739

Table 3.

Association between rurality of patient residence and any use of palliative care or hospice.

Patient Residence Any palliative care use Any hospice use

Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted

OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p

Metropolitan 1.00 (ref) - 1.00 (ref) - 1.00 (ref) - 1.00 (ref) -
Micropolitan 0.88 (0.81 – 0.95) 0.001 0.93 (0.86 – 1.01) 0.09 1.00 (0.92 – 1.09) 0.943 0.93 (0.85 – 1.02) 0.106
Small Town 0.89 (0.81 – 0.98) 0.02 0.98 (0.88 – 1.08) 0.638 0.84 (0.76 – 0.93) 0.001 0.77 (0.69 – 0.86) <0.001
Rural 0.95 (0.84 – 1.06) 0.338 1.01 (0.90 – 1.14) 0.807 0.83 (0.73 – 0.94) 0.002 0.75 (0.66 – 0.85) <0.001

OR= odds ratio; CI= confidence interval

Adjusted models included the following covariates: age, sex, race/ethnicity, Medicare/Medicaid full dual eligibility, disease stage (metastatic vs. not), diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, end-stage renal disease, the composite CMS-Hierarchical Condition Categories risk adjustment score, and ADI.