Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;13:10348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37387-4

Table 4.

Comparison of frequency domain and time domain indices of heart rate variability, perceived stress scale, quality of life and Indian diabetic risk score in normal pregnant women (control group) and women with GDM (study group) at 36th week of gestation.

Parameters Control group (n = 164) Study group (n = 176) p value
HRV frequency domain indices
 TP (ms2) 950.74 (610.20–1310.20) 506.50 (393.00–597.00)  < 0.001
 LFnu 50.50 (38.70–62.36) 62.04 (51.85–65.56)  < 0.001
 HFnu 46.90 (40.25–61.86) 37.74 (33.65–47.93)  < 0.001
 LF–HF ratio 1.10 (0.72–1.40) 1.62 (1.08–1.93)  < 0.001
HRV time domain indices
 SDNN (ms) 40.10 (27.35–52.10) 21.20 (17.40–29.70)  < 0.001
 RMSSD (ms) 45.32 (31.20–58.80) 23.70 (18.40–30.30)  < 0.001
 NN50 33.15 (25.20–43.62) 28.00 (22.00–32.00)  < 0.001
 pNN50 (%) 10.27 (7.10–13.20) 6.05 (4.59–6.88)  < 0.001
Stress and risk scores
 PSS score 14.30 (11.50–17.80) 24.00 (21.00–27.75)  < 0.001
 EPDS score 7.60 ± 1.80 10.57 ± 2.21  < 0.001
 Flanagan  QoL score 105.00 (93.00–113.50) 90.00 (82.25–95.00)  < 0.001
 IDRS 40.00 (35.20–45.80) 60.00 (50.00–70.00)  < 0.001

The data presented are mean ± SD and median (IQR). Comparison was done by unpaired t test for parametric data and Mann Whitney U test for non-parametric data. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

TP total power of HRV, LFnu low-frequency power normalized, HFnu high-frequency power normalized, LF–HF ratio ratio of LF to HF, SDNN standard deviation of normal to normal (NN) interval, RMSSD square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of the differences between adjacent NN intervals, NN50 number of interval differences of successive NN intervals greater than 50, pNN50 NN50 counts divided by all RR intervals, PSS perceived stress scale, EPDS Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, QoL quality of life, IDRS Indian diabetic risk score.