Table 2.

Assessment of bias by AQUA tool

Author name	Objective(s) and subject characteristics	Study design	Methodology characterization	Descriptive anatomy	Reporting of results
Akhtar et al. [57]	Moderate	Moderate	High	Low	Moderate
Ankushrao et al. [5]	Moderate	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Bamne et al. [20]	Low	Moderate	High	Moderate	Moderate
Bodanki et al. [30]	Low	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Chavan et al. [58]	Low	Moderate	High	Low	Low
Chhabra et al. [28]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Deepali et al. [9]	Moderate	Low	High	Low	Low
Dhindsa et al. [59]	Moderate	Low	Moderate	Low	Moderate
Gupta et al. [60]	Moderate	Low	High	High	Low
Jagiasi et al. [18]	Moderate	Low	High	Low	Low
Kalra et al. [61]	Low	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
Kavita et al. [62]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Khalkar et al. [26]	Low	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Lingamdenne et al. [35]	Low	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
Mahto et al. [56]	Moderate	Moderate	High	Low	Moderate
Mamatha et al. [12]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Meshram et al. [8]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Pal et al. [13]	Moderate	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Patel et al. [33]	High	Low	High	Low	Low
Patil et al. [21]	Low	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
Raaj et al. Cadaveric [16]	Moderate	Moderate	High	Low	Low
Raaj et al. CT [16]	Moderate	Moderate	High	Low	Low
Rajput et al. [11]	Moderate	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
SN gosavi et al. [14]	Low	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
SV uma et al. cadaveric [27]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
SV uma et al. Image J software [27]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Sahu et al. [17]	Moderate	Low	Moderate	Moderate	Low
Shalom  et al. [55]	Low	Low	High	Low	Low
Shewale et al. [34]	Moderate	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Singh et al. [54]	Moderate	Low	High	Low	Low
Singh  et al. [23]	Moderate	Low	High	Low	Low
Sinha et al. [10]	Moderate	Low	Moderate	Low	Low
Thute et al. [22]	Low	Low	High	Moderate	Low
Vaishnani et al. [53]	Moderate	Low	High	Low	Low
Vardhan et al. [52]	Moderate	Low	High	Moderate	Moderate
Varghese et al. [51]	Moderate	Moderate	High	Low	Low
Vinay et al. [19]	Low	Low	High	Moderate	low
Yadav et al. [24]	High	Moderate	High	Low	Low