Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;16:1200523. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1200523

Table 2.

Correlation analysis of transcript length with compositional parameters, codon bias measures, gene expression, and protein properties.

Up-regulated transcript %A %C %T %G %A (3) %C (3) %T (3) %G(3) %GC (all)
r 0.544 −0.159 −0.397 0.346 0.211 0.071 0.330 −0.717 0.007
p 0.029 0.557 0.128 0.190 0.433 0.793 0.212 0.002 0.978
Significance * NS NS NS NS NS NS ** NS
Down-regulated transcript %A %C %T %G %A(3) %C(3) %T(3) %G(3) %GC(all)
r 0.904 −0.215 −0.520 0.294 0.757 −0.610 0.449 −0.363 −0.085
p 0.013 0.683 0.290 0.572 0.081 0.198 0.372 0.480 0.873
Significance * NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Up-regulated transcript %GC(1) %GC(2) %GC(3) CAI_59 Scaled_Chi GRAVY AROMA PC 1 PC 2
r 0.780 −0.518 −0.284 0.417 0.968 −0.855 −0.579 0.680 0.156
p 0.000 0.040 0.286 0.108 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.004 0.563
Significance *** * NS NS *** *** * ** NS
Down-regulated transcript %GC(1) %GC(2) %GC(3) CAI_59 Scaled_Chi GRAVY AROMA PC 1 PC 2
r 0.414 0.685 −0.760 −0.760 0.995 −0.804 −0.550 0.760 −0.460
p 0.414 0.133 0.079 0.079 0.000 0.054 0.258 0.079 0.359
Significance NS NS NS NS *** NS NS NS NS

***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05; NS, non-significant.