Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr;18(2):213–236. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12371

Table 1.

Quality Assessment based on Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Modified Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool

1 st author; year Study type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Selection Comparability outcome Score Qualitative score
Morgan; 2002 Cross-sectional * * * ** - * 3 US
Shirom; 2003 * * * * ** - ** 4 S
Cole; 2007 * * * * * * **** - ** 6 G
Tvaryanas; 2009 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Boxmeer; 2011 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Chang; 2011 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Mohammad; 2012 * * * - * 2 US
Serec; 2012 * * * * * *** - ** 5 G
Bue; 2013 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Salimi; 2013 * * * * *** - * 4 S
Chappelle; 2014 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Ojedokn; 2014 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Ouma; 2011 * * * ** - * 3 US
Smith; 2015 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Chambel; 2015 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Matthew; 2015 * * * - * 2 US
Taghva; 2015 * * * * - ** 3 US
Tao; 2015 * * ** * * ** ** ** 6 G
Zheng; 2015 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Bryan; 2018 * * * * ** * * **** ** ** 8 VG
Carvalho; 2018 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Ivey; 2018 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Topa; 2018 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Chappelle; 2019 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Dobbs; 2019 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Merlini; 2019 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
Sipos; 2019 * * ** * ** ** * 5 G
Vojvodić; 2019 * * * ** - * 3 US
Ndongo; 2020 * ** * * * ** ** 5 G
Vojvodic; 2020 * * * ** - * 3 US
Chappelle; 2011 * * * * *** - * 4 S
Prince; 2012 * * * * *** - * 4 S
Chappelle; 2013 * * * * *** - * 4 S
Goodman; 2018 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 VG
1st author; year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Selection Comparability outcome Score Qualitative score
Moran; 2008 Longitudinal * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 G
Vinokur; 2009 * * * * ** * * * **** ** *** 9 VG
Chambel; 2010 * * * * * * * *** * *** 7 G
Morgan; 2011 * * * ** * * * *** ** *** 8 VG
Vinokur; 2011 * * * * ** * * * **** ** *** 9 VG
Delahaij; 2016 * * * * ** * * 4 S
Alessandri; 2018 * * * ** * * *** ** ** 7 G
1st author; year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Selection Comparability outcome Score Qualitative score
Villar; 2017 Case-Control * * * ** * *** ** * 6 G
1st author; year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Bakker; 2007 Experimental UC H UC L H UC L

Qualitative score: US, Unsatisfactory; S, Satisfactory; G, Good; VG, Very Good. Risk of Bias Assessment abbreviation: UC, Unclear; L, Low; H, High