Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 15;9(6):e17346. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17346

Table 1.

Comparison of the analytical performance of HDPBA‒MWCNTs/CPE with other electrodes reported in the literature for the detection of Zn(II).

Electrodea Technique Preconcentra-tion time (s) Liner range (nM) LOD (nM) Reproducibility, RSD (%) Sensitivity (μA/μΜ) Epa (V) Ref.
Hg nanodroplets
Supported at biochar-modified CPE
DPASV 180 500–30000 170 ‒1.10 [39]
Boron-doped diamond
Electrode
DPV 240 76.50–624.3 2.45 <5 14.1 ≈ −1.20 [40]
MCPE modified with chelating resin DPV 90 153–765 109 4.0 38.3 ‒1.05 [41]
Cr‒CPE SWASV 100 1224–12240 382 0.71 ≈ −1.20 [42]
Bismuth film-modified
Electrode
DPASV 110 76.50–1683 16.7 1.74 ≈ −1.18 [10]
G/PANI/SPE SWASV 15.30–4590 15.3 9.2 1.48 ‒1.31 [43]
Hg–Bi/SWNTs/GCE SWASV 120 7.650–1989 3.57 ‒1.08 [44]
HDPBA‒MWCNTs/CPE SWASV 120 20–10000 2.48 3.1 38.5 ‒1.19 Present work
a

MCPE: modified carbon paste electrode; Cr: chromium(III) oxide; G/PANI: graphene polyaniline nanocomposite; Hg–Bi/SWNTs: Bimetallic Hg–Bi/single-walled carbon nanotubes composite.