Table 4.
Details of resistance QTLs related Xcc R1.
| Inoculation test | QTL name | Linkage group | Number of bin | Position (cM) | Physical position (bp) | LOD a | Add b | Dominance effect | R2 (%) c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1st) 2020 Summer | qCaBR-C2-1 | C02 | 19 | 46.57 - 54.86 | 16,499,782-49,025,692 | 2.55 | 0.37 | -0.25 | 8.2 |
| qCaBR-C5 | C05 | 27 | 47.47 - 60.98 | 12,846,418-42,204,163 | 4.27 | -0.46 | -0.45 | 13.6 | |
| (2nd) 2020 Fall | qCaBR-C2-2 | C02 | 38 | 21.02 - 45.62 | 3,513,666-16,499,781 | 3.42 | 0.56 | 0.19 | 12.2 |
| qCaBR-C6-1 | C06 | 23 | 11.93 - 21.96 | 27,081,550-34,373,426 | 2.18 | -0.27 | -0.51 | 7.28 | |
| qCaBR-C7 | C07 | 4 | 50.05 - 51.55 | 44,486,293-45,629,195 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 6.75 | |
| (3rd) 2021 Spring | qCaBR-C2-3 | C02 | 6 | 59.30 - 63.15 | 50,467,819-52,028,484 | 2.39 | -0.22 | 0.65 | 8.03 |
| qCaBR-C6-2 | C06 | 39 | 13.32 - 34.84 | 29,853,043-37,960,957 | 2.76 | -0.56 | -0.38 | 9.9 |
a
Logarithm of odds ratio at the position of the peak.
b
Additive effect of QTL.
c
Percent of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.