Process components for resident scholarship
Identify scholarly question/need with clear goals Perform adequate literature search Identify appropriate approach (e.g., methods and analysis, teaching design) Submit IRB or equivalent (if applicable) Acquire data (e.g., conduct research study, needs assessment) Interpret results/data Draft abstract/manuscript/presentation/curriculum
-
2
Resident scholarly activity outcomes classified by types of scholarship
Scholarship of Discovery (advancing knowledge)
Case report Quality assurance/improvement project Systematic review/Scoping review Original article–randomized‐controlled trial (RCT) Original article–non‐RCT Abstract related to above examples
Scholarship of Integration (synthesizing knowledge)
Narrative review, Conceptual review Systematic review/Scoping review Textbook chapters Evidence‐based medicine guidelines
Scholarship of Application (applying knowledge)
Scientific committees, guideline panels (participation & leadership) Departmental Institutional Local/Regional National
Teaching (disseminating knowledge)
Didactic, Grand Rounds, Group teaching (small/large), Workshops Departmental Institutional Local/Regional National
-
3
Levels of dissemination
Department only Institution Regional National International Online* (Assessment to vary based on reach/platform)
-
4
Peer review timeline and expertise
Pre‐submission review
Local committee (e.g., program leadership, faculty with expertise in the area of the scholarship) Mentor review
Submission review
Journal peer review Web based/digital Scientific conference Presentation feedback/evaluation
Post submission review
Peer network rating/reviews Social network commentary Review of evaluation data
Letter to the editor
|
