Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;23:1245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16159-9

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study participants

Anticipated stigma
High Low pc
n=1,084 n=545
N (%) or Mean (± SD) N (%) or Mean (± SD)
Sex
 Male 420 (38.7) 289 (53.0) <0.001
 Female 664 (61.3) 256 (47.0)
Age, years 48.1 (± 7.0) 49.3 (± 7.2) 0.001
Education
 Lower than university degree 610 (56.6) 262 (48.2) 0.001
 University degree or higher 468 (43.4) 282 (51.8)
Work status
 Employed 952 (87.9) 482 (89.0) 0.545
 Unemployed 131 (12.1) 60 (11.1)
Cohabitation status
 Living with others 919 (91.7) 450 (88.8) 0.061
 Living alone 83 (8.3) 57 (11.2)
Perceived riska
 High 676 (62.5) 270 (49.6) <0.001
 Low 405 (37.5) 274 (50.4)
Comorbidity status susceptible to stigmatizationa
 Yes 194 (18.0) 75 (13.8) 0.034
 No 890 (82.1) 470 (86.2)
Diabetes mellitus
 Yes 43 (4.0) 13 (2.4) 0.098
 No 1,041 (96.0) 532 (97.6)
Psychiatric disorder
 Yes 66 (6.1) 32 (5.9) 0.862
 No 1,018 (93.9) 513 (94.1)
Arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis
 Yes 42 (3.9) 17 (3.1) 0.441
 No 1,042 (96.1) 528 (96.9)
Chronic respiratory disease
 Yes 63 (5.8) 25 (4.6) 0.302
 No 1,021 (94.2) 520 (95.4)
Strong normative beliefsb 18.3 (± 4.7) 16.9 (± 4.9) <0.001

SD Standard deviation

aCronbach’s alpha: perceived risk (0.82), norm (0.87)

bPossible score ranging from 1 to 5

cStudent’s t-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables.