Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;23:423. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03119-3

Table 4.

Results of statistical analysis between different pulp capping materials (Ca(OH)2 based cement, MTA and Biodentine) regarding calcific bridge formation, pulpal inflammation and tissue necrosis in control and corticosteroid-treated groups

Material Parameter Scores Control Group Corticosteroid - treated Group P
Ca(OH) 2 based cement Calcific bridge formation Median (Range) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) < 0.05*
P 0.23
Pulpal inflammation Median (Range) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0)
P 1.00
Tissue necrosis Median (Range) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0)
P 0.98
MTA Calcific bridge formation Median (Range) 4.0 (3.0–4.0) 3.5 (3.0–4.0) < 0.05*
P 0.49
Pulpal inflammation Median (Range) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0)
P 0.7
Tissue necrosis Median (Range) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0)
P 0.69
Biodentine Calcific bridge formation Median (Range) 4.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.00 (3.0–4.0) < 0.05*
P 0.44
Pulpal inflammation Median (Range) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0)
P 1.00
Tissue necrosis Median (Range) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0)
P 0.7

†Kruskal Wallis, ‡Mann−Whitney U, *Significant at ≤ 0.05