Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;40(13-14):1339–1351. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0146

Table 2.

Differences of ALFF and ReHo Between Choking and Choking-Naïve Participants

Cluster Brain regions Peak (MNI)
Voxel size Peak t
x y z
ALFF            
 Left hemisphere            
 Cluster 1 Middle occipital gyrus -40 -67 36 163 -4.522
 Cluster 2 Posterior cingulum -9 -46 30 114 -3.206
 Cluster 3 Rolandic operculum -50 5 10 122 -2.601
 Cluster 4 Inferior orbitofrontal gyrus -49 35 -3 123 -3.922
 Right hemisphere            
 Cluster 1 Post-central gyrus 33 -35 62 299 3.831
 Cluster 2 Pre-central gyrus 22 -24 57 201 3.410
 Cluster 3 Olfactory gyrus 13 14 -14 133 3.881
 Cluster 4 Middle cingulum 14 24 33 138 -3.452
 Cluster 5 Superior occipital gyrus 32 -64 41 140 -3.445
ReHo            
 Left hemisphere            
 Cluster 1 Post-central cingulum -9 -44 31 306 -3.122
 Cluster 2 Rolandic operculum -51 7 3 232 -3.412
 Cluster 3 Angular gyrus -40 -68 37 173 -3.890
Right hemisphere            
 Cluster 1 Post-central gyrus 29 -34 65 356 4.021
 Cluster 2 Pre-central gyrus 22 -24 57 361 3.482
 Cluster 3 Pre-central gyrus 49 -6 41 242 4.095

The multiple comparison correction for ALFF was used by the FWE correction with Monte Carlo simulation p < 0.05 and cluster size >107. The multiple comparison correction for ReHo was used by the FWE correction with Monte Carlo simulation p < 0.05 and cluster size >171.

ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; FEW, family-wise error; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; ReHo, regional homogeneity.