Table 7.

ConQual summary of findings.

Perceptions of learning and teaching human movement in physiotherapy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
Synthesized findings	Type of research	Dependability	Credibility	ConQual score	Comments
1. Perceived significance of being present Students and therapists/instructors perceived that being present in movement was central to learning and teaching movement	Qualitative	Moderate (downgraded one level*)	Moderate (downgraded one level**)	Low	Dependability: downgraded due to the dependability of the (6) primary studies: one study addressed five, two addressed four and three addressed two of the five dependability questions. Credibility: downgraded due to a mix of unequivocal and credible findings (5 U, 22C).
2. Perceived significance of movement quality Therapists/instructors perceived that understanding and guiding movement quality was central to learning and teaching movement	Qualitative	Moderate (downgraded one level*)	Moderate (downgraded one level**)	Low	Dependability: downgraded due to the dependability of the (6) primary studies: one study addressed five, three addressed four and two addressed two of the five dependability questions. Credibility: downgraded due to a mix of unequivocal and credible findings (6 U, 18C).
3. Perceived significance of movement transfer Students and therapists/instructors perceived that enhancement of movement transfer was central in learning and teaching movement	Qualitative	Moderate (downgraded one level*)	Moderate (downgraded one level**)	Low	Dependability: downgraded due to the dependability of the (17) primary studies: three studies addressed five, nine addressed four and five addressed two of the five dependability questions. Credibility: downgraded due to a mix of unequivocal and credible findings (20 U, 45C).
4. Perceived significance of contextual factors Therapists/instructors perceived that acknowledgement of contextual factors was central to learning and teaching movement	Qualitative	Moderate (downgraded one level*)	Moderate (downgraded one level**)	Low	Dependability: downgraded due to the dependability of the (12) primary studies: three studies addressed five, six addressed four and three addressed two of the five dependability questions. Credibility: downgraded due to a mix of unequivocal and credible findings (1 U, 25C).

U, unequivocal; C, credible.

*Downgraded due to a mix of high and moderate dependability scores.

**Downgraded due to a mix of credible and unequivocal findings.