Table 1.
Randomized controlled trials comparing LISA with the continuation of CPAP or S-ETT.
Reference | Study Design | Intervention | Comparator | Main Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
LISA vs. continuation of CPAP | ||||
Gopel et al., 2011 (AMV trial) [34] |
12 centers 26–28 weeks GA Various types of surfactant (poractant alfa, beractant, bovactant) Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg Analgosedation: per physician decision |
FiO2 > 0.3, CPAP ≥ 4 cmH2O Cologne method 4 Fr NGT LISA was allowed to be repeated if FiO2 > 0.4 Rescue intubation according to the judgment of physician (unclear tresholds) |
Rescue intubation and surfactant according to the judgement of the attending physician (unclear tresholds) Extubation was recommended * |
n = 220, LISA group n = 108 (65 LISA, 15 S-ETT per physician decision, 28 never received surfactant), comparator group n = 112 (72 S-ETT, 1 LISA per physician decision, 39 never received surfactant) ↓ need for MV on day 2 or 3 (28% vs. 46%, p = 0.008) ↓ need for MV during hospital stay (33% vs. 73%, p < 0.0001) ↓ median days on MV (0 vs. 2 days, p < 0.0001) ↓ need for O2 at 28 days (30% vs. 45%, p = 0.032) |
Dargaville et al., 2021 (OPTIMIST-A trial) [37] |
33 centers 25–28 weeks GA Double-blinded Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3, CPAP 5–8 cmH2O Surfactant: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg Premedication: atropin and sucrose per physician decision |
Hobart method 16G vascular catheter or LISAcath LISA was not allowed to be repeated Rescue intubation if FiO2 ≥ 0.45 (or 0.4 per physician decision) or recurrent apnea or persistent respiratory acidosis |
Sham treatment (only transient repositioning) Rescue intubation if FiO2 ≥ 0.45 (or 0.4 per physician decision) or recurrent apnea or persistent respiratory acidosis After intubation, surfactant could be administered according to clinical judgement. |
n = 485 ↔ death or BPD (43.6% vs. 49.6% p = 0.1) ↓ death (10% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.51) ↓ BPD in survivors (37.3% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.03) ↓ PTX (4.6% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.005) ↓ CPAP failure (36.5% vs. 72.1%, p < 0.001) |
LISA vs. surfactant administration via ETT with extubation | ||||
Kribs et al., 2015 (NINSAPP trial) [35] |
13 centers 23–26 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3, CPAP cmH2O or Silverman score ≥ 5 Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg No premedication |
Cologne method 4 Fr NGT |
S-ETT then MV as per local standards Extubation criteria: FiO2 > 0.3 and MAP < 10 cmH2O |
n = 211 ↔ survival without BPD (67.3% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.2) ↓ need for MV (74.8% vs. 99% ∆, p = 0.04) ↓ median duration of MV (5 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.031) ↓ PTX (4.8% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.04) ↓ IVH (10.3% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.02) ↑ survival without major complications (50.5% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.02). |
Olivier et al., 2017 [36] | 3 centers 32–36 weeks GA Surfactant type: beractant Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg Fentanyl 1 µg/kg + atropin 20 µg/kg |
FiO2 > 0.35, CPAP 6 cmH2O Cologne method 5 Fr NGT |
Rescue intubation and surfactant according to the judgment of the attending physician (unclear tresholds), Extubation criteria was not reported (extubation was not routinely performed) |
n = 45 ↓ primary outcome (need for MV or respiratory failure criteria or PTX requiring chest drain) (33% vs. 90%, p ≤ 0.001) |
LISA vs. INSURE | ||||
Kanmaz et al., 2012 (Take Care study) [38] |
Single center <32 weeks GA Surrfactant criteria: FiO2 ≥ 0.4, CPAP 5–7 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg No premedication |
Take Care method 5 Fr NGT (1 bolus in 30–60 s) |
Double-lumen ETT During surfactant instillation (30 s), 20/5 cmH2O pressure PPV was performed with a T-piece device, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 200 ↓ CPAP failure (30% vs. 45%, p = 0.02) ↓ mean duration of CPAP (78 h vs. 116 h, p = 0.002) ↓ mean duration of MV (35.6 h vs. 64.1 h, p = 0.006) ↓ BPD (10.3% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.005) |
Mirnia et al., 2013 [39] | 3 centers 27–32 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 ≥ 0.3, CPAP 8–10 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg Atropin 5 µg/kg |
Take Care method 5 Fr NGT (1 bolus in 1–3 min) |
No detail reported |
n = 136 ↔ CPAP failure (19% vs. 22%, p = 0.6) ↓ mortality (3% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.01) |
Mohammadizadeh et al., 2015 [40] | 2 centers ≤34 weeks GA and and BW 1000–1800 g Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3, CPAP 6 cmH2O and/or Silverman score >4 Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg Atropin 25 µg/kg |
Cologne method 4 Fr NGT |
2.5–3.0 ETT Bolus injection then PPV with a T-piece device for at least 1 min or until SpO2 ≥87%, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 38 ↔ CPAP failure (15.8% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.99) ↓ duration of O2 therapy (243.7 h vs. 476.8 h, p = 0.018) ↓ adverse events during surfactant administration (31.6% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.049) |
Bao et al., 2015 [41] | Single center 28–32 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3 for 28–29 weeks GA, FiO2 > 0.35 for 30–32 weeks GA, CPAP 7–8 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Hobart method 16G vascular catheter (5 boluses in 3–5 min) |
Surfactant injection in 2–3 boluses in 3 min, brief MV (details not reported), then extubation to CPAP |
n = 90 ↔ CPAP failure (17% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.44) ↓ duration of MV + CPAP (13.2 days vs. 15.9 days, p = 0.03) |
Li et al., 2016 [42] | Single center 27–31 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: RDS grade I-II on CXR Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: various doses No premedication |
Cologne method | No detail reported |
n = 40 Both LISA and INSURE caused a transient impairment in cerebral autoregulation, the duration of this effect was shorter in the LISA group (<5 min vs. 5–10 min) |
Mosayabi et al., 2017 [43] | Single center 28–34 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 5–8 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Take Care method 5 Fr NGT |
Surfactant injection in 1–3 min, manual ventilation (bagging), then extubation to CPAP 3 min |
n = 53 ↔ CPAP failure (38.3% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.827) |
Choupani et al., 2018 [44] | Single center GA or BW criteria not reported Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 6 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Hobart method 16G vascular catheter (small aliquots in 2–4 min) |
Bolus injection, then PPV with a T-piece device for at least 1 min or until SpO2 ≥87%, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 104 ↔ CPAP failure (15.4% vs. 25%, p = 0.222) ↓ incidence of hypoxia (SpO2 < 80%) during surfactant administration (11.5% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.028) |
Halim et al., 2019 [45] | Single center ≤34 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 5–7 cmH2O Surfactant type: beractant Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg No premedication |
Take Care method 6 Fr NGT |
Bolus injection, then PPV with a T-piece device for 15–20 min, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 100 ↓ need for MV at any time (30% vs. 60%, p = 0.003) ↓ median duration of MV (40 h vs. 71 h, p = 0.004) |
Boskadabi et al., 2019 [46] | Single center <32 weeks GA and and BW <1500 g Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 5–8 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Take Care method 5 Fr NGT |
Bolus injection, bagging for 30–60 s, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 40 ↓ CPAP failure (0% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) |
Jena et al., 2019 [47] | 3 centers ≤34 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3, CPAP 6 cmH2O Surfactant type: bovine lipid extract surfactant suspension Surfactant dose: 135 mg/kg No premedication |
Hobart method 16G vascular catheter or Take Care method 6 Fr NGT based on individual preference |
Bolus injection, then PPV with a T-piece device (no detail reported), then extubation to CPAP |
n = 350 ↓ CPAP failure (19% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) ↓ duration of CPAP (4 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.01) ↓ duration of O2 therapy (6 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.01) ↓ BPD (3% vs. 17%, p < 0.01) |
Yang et al., 2020 [48] | Single center 32–36 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 6 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant dose: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Cologne method 4 Fr NGT |
Bolus injection then PPV (no detail reported), then extubation to CPAP |
n = 97 ↔ need for MV (8.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.8) ↔ duration of MV (3.1 days vs. 3.3 days, p = 0.27) |
Han et al., 2020 [49] | 8 centers 25–31 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.4, CPAP 6–8 cmH2O Surfactant type: calf pulmonary surfactant preparation Surfactant dose: 70–100 mg/kg No premedication |
Modified Cologne method with 10 cm ophthalmic forceps 4 Fr NGT (in mini boluses over 1–5 min) |
Bolus surfactant, MV as per local standards, then extubation if FiO2 < 0.3 and MAP < 8 cmH2O |
n = 298 ↔ BPD (19.2% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.17) ↓ PDA (41.1% vs. 60.5%, p = 0.001) Subgroup analysis of <30 weeks GA (n = 51): ↓ BPD (29% vs. 70%, p = 0.004) |
Gupta et al., 2020 [50] | Single center 28–34 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3; NIPPV fr 40/min, PIP 12–15 cmH2O, PEEP 5–6 cmH2O Surfactant type: poractant alfa Surfactant doze: 200 mg/kg No premedication |
Cologne method 5 Fr NGT (1 mL aliquots, each lasting for 10 s) |
Bolus injection, bagging for 30–60 s, then extubation to NIPPV |
n = 58 ↔ CPAP failure (10.34% vs. 20.69%, p = 0.47) |
Pareek et al., 2021 [51] | Single center 28–36 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: NIPPV (unclear tresholds) at least 2 of the following criteria: Silverman score ≥ 4 or FiO2 > 0.3 for <30 weeks GA and FiO2 > 0.4 for ≥30 weeks GA or > stage II RDS on CXR Surfactant type: not reported Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg No premedication |
Cologne or Take Care method based on individual preference 5 Fr NGT |
Bolus injection, then PPV with a T-piece device (no detail reported), then extubation to the NIPPV |
n = 40 ↔ CPAP failure (30% vs. 30%, p = 0.99) |
Anand et al., 2022 [52] | Single center 26–34 weeks GA Surfactant criteria: FiO2 > 0.3 within 6 h of life Surfactant type: beractant Surfactant dose: 100 mg/kg No premedication |
Take Care method 8 Fr NGT |
Injection in four equal aliquots, bagging between aliquots, then extubation to CPAP |
n = 150 ↔ duration of respiratory support (120 h vs. 120 h p = 0.618) ↓ need for MV (9.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.017) ↓CPAP failure (17.5% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.005) |
Table notes: First % values refer to the LISA group and second values refer to the comparator group. ↑—significantly higher, ↓—siginificantly lower, ↔—not significantly different, * Despite the recommendation, of 81 infants who were intubated on the first day after birth, only 27 (33%) were extubated within the first 24 h, ∆ One infant was not intubated since FiO2 dropped below the treatment treshold immediatley after randomization Cologne method—insertion of a flexible catheter with Magill’s forceps, Take Care method—insertion of a flexible catheter without Magill’s forceps, Hobart method—insertion of a semi-rigid catheter. Surfactant administration via ETT with extubation in these trials, control infants remained intubated after surfactant delivery, with extubation after a period of mechanical ventilation. Abbreviations: LISA—less invasive surfactant administration, S-ETT—surfactant administration via endotracheal tube with (INSURE) or without extubation, GA—gestational age, NGT—nasogastric tube, FiO2—fraction of inspired oxygen, MV—mechanical ventilation, INSURE—intubation–surfactant–extubation, BPD—bronchopulmonary dysplasia, IVH—intraventricular hemorrhage, CPAP—continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP failure—need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth, RDS—respiratory distress syndrome, CXR—chest X-ray, ETT—endotracheal tube, PPV—positive pressure ventilation, PTX—pneumothorax, BW—birth weight, PDA—patent ductus arteriosus, NIPPV—non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.