Table 2.
Treatment | Authors | Study | N | Patients’ Characteristics | Study Design Endpoints |
Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLINDAMYCIN (Monotherapy and combinations) | ||||||
Clindamycin [23] | Clemmensen O.J. et al., 1983 | Double-blind trial | 30 | Hurley stage not specified | Clindamycin vs. placebo | Clindamycin significantly superior to placebo except for inflammatory nodules and abscesses at each monthly evaluation (p less than 0.01) |
Clindamycin [24] | Jemec G.B.E. et al., 1998 | Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT | 46 | Hurley stage I or II HS | Tetraciclyne 1 g/die PO + topical placebo vs. placebo PO + topical clindamycin 1% for at least 3 mo | No significant differences between the two treatments in terms of VAS score Patients’ global assessment of disease was significantly worse than physician’s assessment in 3 of 5 evaluations (p = 0.0096 to 0.015), but the correlation between patients’ and physicians’ assessments was satisfactory after only one visit (rs = 0.761 to 0.895) |
Clindamycin [25] | Molinelli E. et al., 2020 | Retrospective study | 124 | Hurley stage I or II HS |
|
Patients treated with resorcinol 15% showed a significant improvement in HS clinical response, international HS severity core system and pain visual analogue scale score from baseline compared to patients treated with clindamycin; In group A (clindamycin 1%), clinical response (HiSCR) was obtained in 38 (52%) of 73 patients after 12 weeks (p < 0.01). In group B (resorcinol 15%), clinical response was achieved in 52 (85.3%) of 61 patients after 12 weeks (p < 0.001). At 12 weeks, the clinical response to resorcinol 15% was higher than the response to topical antibiotic, with statistically significance (p < 0.001). |
Clindamycin [32] | Caposiena Caro R.D. et al., 2019 | Retrospective study | 60 | Hurley stage I or II HS |
|
After 8 weeks of treatment the responses to antibiotics were similar in both groups. |
Clindamycin [13] | An J.H. et al., 2021 | Retrospective study | 53 | Hurley stage II or III HS | Clindamycin monotherapy for 8 weeks | Improvement in rate of HS clinical response (Hi-SCR) achievers and comparing HS physician’s global assessment (HS-PGA) before (W0) and after (W8) the treatment. Twenty-one patients (61.76%) achieved Hi-SCR. The mean scoring of HS-PGA had significantly decreased from 3.24 to 2.15 (p = 0.001). |
Clindamycin-rifampicin [28] | Gener G. et al., 2009 | Retrospective study | 116 | Hurley stage III HS | Clindamycin (300 mg PO BID) + rifampicin (600 mg PO daily) | Improvement of median Sartorius score at the end of treatment (29 vs. 14.5; p < 0.001), and of QoL score. |
Clindamycin-rifampicin [30] | van der Zee H.H. et al., 2009 | Retrospective study | 34 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS | Clindamycin (300 mg PO BID) + rifampicin (600 mg PO daily) | Partial improvement: 82%; total remission: 47% (maximum effect of treatment within 10 weeks). Following total remission, 8 of 13 (61.5%) patients treated as mentioned above experienced a relapse after a mean period of 5.0 months. |
Clindamycin-rifampicin [31] | Dessinioti C. et al., 2016 | Prospective study | 26 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS | Clindamycin (300 mg PO BID) + rifampicin (600 mg PO daily) for 12 weeks | 12-week clinical response rate: 73%; At the 1-year follow-up, there was sustained efficacy in 7 (41%) patients, while 10 (59%) had disease relapse after a mean time of 4.2 months. |
Clidamycin-Oxofloxacin [34] | Delaunay J. et al., 2018 | Retrospective study | 65 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS | Clindamycin (600–1800 mg) + oflaxacin (200–400 mg) | Efficacy in disease control in HS. Thirty-eight patients (58.4%) reported improvement of disease activity under OC with complete response for 22/65 (33.8%) and partial remission in 16/65 (24.6%) patients. |
TETRACYCLINES | ||||||
Minocycline [37] | [37] K. et al., 2017 | Prospective study | 20 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS | Minocycline 100 mg PO + colchicine 0.5 mg BID for 6 months, followed by colchicine maintenance 0.5 mg BID for 3 months | Efficacy in disease control in HSPhysician global assessment (PGA) scale (PGA) shows good and excellent response in 95% of patients at 9 months. |
Limecycline [20] | Caposiena Caro R.D. et al., 2021 | Retrospective study | 52 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS |
|
Both treatments are effective in terms of IHS4, pain VAS scale and DLQI for patients with moderate-severe HS. Response rates at the end of the treatments were similar in both groups (p = 0.78): 57.7% in group A and 53.8% in group B met the primary outcome (HiSCR). |
Tetracycline [36] | Jørgensen A.R. et al., 2021 | Prospective study | 143 | Hurley stage I, II, III HS |
|
All treatments were effective and safe in HS patients. Tetracycline provided the greatest clinical improvement mean The mean HSS at baseline was 26.10 (SD 20.18) points, improving to 17.97 (SD 17.88) at follow-up, difference is 8.13 (95% CI 5.21–10.93), p < 0.0001 sured by HSS. |
ERTAPENEM | ||||||
Ertapenem [40] | Join-Lambert O. et al., 2016 | Retrospective study | 30 | Hurley stage III | Ertapenem 1 g die for 6 weeks + antibiotic consolidation treatments for 6 months (M6) in severe HS | Dramatic improvement of severe HS provided by ertapenem. The median (IQR) Sartorious score dropped from 49.5 (28–62) at baseline to 19.0 (12–28) after ertapenm (p < 10−4). |
Ertapenem [3] |
Braunberger T.L. et al., 2018 | Retrospective study | 36 | Hurley stage II, III HS | Ertapenem 1 g die | Clinical improvement in 97.2% of patients and an improvement in quality of life in 85.7% of patients. |
METRONIDAZOLE (monotherapy and combinations) | ||||||
Metronidazole [50] | Delage M. et al., 2023 | Prospective trial | 28 | Hurley stage I HS | Rifampicin + moxifloxacin + metronidazole | The primary endpoint was a Sartorius score of 0 (clinical remission) at week 12. The median Sartorius score dropped from 14 to 0 (p = 6 × 10−6) at week 12, with 75% of patients reaching clinical remission. |
Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole [51] |
Nassif A et al., 2012 | Case report | 4 | Hurley stage II HS | Ceftriaxone IV + metronidazole PO | Improvement of HS |
DALBAVANCIN | ||||||
Dalbavancin [6] | Molinelli E. et al., 2022 | Retrospective study | 8 | Hurley stage I, II or III HS | Dalbavancin 100 mg IV | Significant disease improvement at 12 weeks; Significant disease improvement was achieved at 12 weeks (T12) with average values of 7 for IHS4, 2 for pain VAS, and 8 for DLQI, and HiSCR was satisfied in six out of eight patients compared to baseline (T0) |
Keys: BID: bis in die; Hi-SCR: Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response; HS: hidradenitis suppurative; mo: months; N: number; HS-PGA: Hidradenitis suppurativa-physician’s global assessment; IHS4: Hidradenitis suppurativa severity score system; PO: per os; RCT: Randomize clinical trials; VAS: Visual analogue scale.