Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;12(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061040

Table 1.

Pooled results and certainty assessment of randomized clinical trials and observational studies involving children with one previous UTI (first clinical question).

Certainty Assessment No. of Patients Effect Certainty
No. of Studies Study Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other Considerations Antibiotic Prophylaxis No Prophylaxis Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
Risk of UTI recurrence (follow-up: mean 12 months; assessed as rates of recurrence)
3 [20,21,22] randomized trials not serious a not serious not serious serious b none 68/515 (13.2%) 94/617 (15.2%) RR 0.87
(0.65 to 1.16)
20 fewer per 1000
(53 fewer–24 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
1 [23] observational studies not serious c not serious not serious very serious b none 19/128 (14.8%) 64/483 (13.3%) HR 1.01
(0.50 to 2.02)
1 more per 1000
(64 fewer–117 more)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Risk of new renal scars (follow-up: mean 12 months; assessed as rates of new renal scars on DMSA scan)
3 [20,21,22] randomized trials not serious a not serious not serious serious b none 14/358 (3.9%) 15/309 (4.9%) RR 0.81
(0.40 to 1.64)
9 fewer per 1000
(29 fewer–31 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Risk of new antimicrobial resistances (follow-up: mean 12 months; assessed as rates of infections resistant to empiric antibiotics)
1 [20] randomized trials not serious a not serious not serious serious b none 24/288 (8.3%) 13/288 (4.5%) RR 1.85
(0.96 to 3.55)
38 more per 1000
(2 fewer–115 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
2 [23,25] observational studies not serious c not serious not serious serious d very strong association 24/45 (53.3%) 43/399 (10.8%) OR 4.49
(2.81 to 7.12)
244 more per 1000
(146 more–355 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Risk of drug-related adverse events (follow-up: mean 12 months; assessed as rates of drug-related adverse event)
2 [20,21] randomized trials not seriou a not serious not serious not serious strong association 29/499 (5.8%) 10/415 (2.4%) RR 2.41
(1.19 to 4.89)
34 more per 1000
(5 more–94 more)
⨁⨁⨁⨁
High

CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio. a: complete risk of bias analysis with results for single domains of the RoB2 tool is presented in Supplementary Materials. b: OIS criterion is not met and 95% CI overlaps no effect. c: complete risk of bias analysis with results for Newcastle–Ottawa Scale tool is presented in Supplementary Tables and Figures. d: OIS criterion is not met.