Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;12(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061040

Table 2.

Pooled results and certainty assessment of randomized clinical trials and observational studies involving children with recurrent UTIs (second clinical question).

Certainty Assessment No. of Patients Effect Certainty
No. of Studies Study Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other Considerations Antibiotic Prophylaxis No Prophylaxis Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
Risk of UTI recurrence (follow-up: mean 12 months; assessed as rates of recurrence)
1 [20] randomized trials not serious a not serious not serious very serious b none 15/54 (27.8%) 16/44 (36.4%) RR 0.76
(0.43 to 1.37)
87 fewer per 1000
(207 fewer–135 more)
⨁⨁◯◯
Low
Risk of new antimicrobial resistances (assessed as rates of infections resistant to empiric antibiotics)
1 [35] observational studies not serious c not serious not serious very serious d none 4/10 (40.0%) 7/27 (25.9%) RR 1.54
(0.57 to 4.16)
140 more per 1000
(111 fewer–819 more)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low

CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio. a: complete risk of bias analysis with results for single domains of the RoB2 tool is presented in Supplementary Materials. b: OIS criterion is not met and 95% CI overlaps no effect. c: complete risk of bias analysis with results for Newcastle–Ottawa Scale tool is presented in Supplementary Tables and Figures. d: OIS criterion is not met.