Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;12(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12061040

Table 3.

Pooled results and certainty assessment of randomized clinical trials and observational studies involving children with VUR of any grade (third clinical question).

Certainty Assessment No. of Patients Effect Certainty
No. of Studies Study Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other Considerations Antibiotic Prophylaxis No Prophylaxis Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
Risk of UTI recurrence (follow-up: mean 18 months; assessed as rates of recurrence)
5 [20,22,40,41,42] randomized trials not serious a not serious not serious not serious none 140/632 (22.2%) 195/656 (29.7%) RR 0.75
(0.62 to 0.90)
74 fewer per 1000
(113 fewer–30 fewer)
⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Risk of UTI recurrence (follow-up: mean 44 months; assessed as rates of recurrence)
2 [43,44] observational studies not serious b not serious not serious serious c none 80/449 (17.8%) 53/368 (14.4%) RR 1.11
(0.96 to 1.30)
16 more per 1000
(6 fewer–43 more)
⨁◯◯◯
Very low
Risk of new renal scars (follow-up: mean 20 months; assessed as rates of new renal scars on DMSA scan)
3 [22,41,42] randomized trials not serious not serious not serious serious c none 23/325 (7.1%) 21/335 (6.3%) RR 1.13
(0.64 to 2.00)
8 more per 1000
(23 fewer–63 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate
Risk of new antimicrobial resistances (follow-up: mean 24 months; assessed as rates of infections resistant to empiric antibiotics)
1 [41] randomized trials not serious not serious not serious serious d strong association 26/38 (68.4%) 17/69 (24.6%) RR 2.78
(1.74 to 4.42)
439 more per 1000
(182 more–843 more)
⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
Risk of drug-related adverse events (follow-up: mean 24 months; assessed as rates of drug-related adverse event)
1 [41] randomized trials not serious not serious not serious serious e none 153/302 (50.7%) 165/305 (54.1%) RR 0.94
(0.80 to 1.09)
32 fewer per 1000
(108 fewer–49 more)
⨁⨁⨁◯
Moderate

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio. a: complete risk of bias analysis with results for single domains of the RoB2 tool is presented in Supplementary Tables and Figures. b: complete risk of bias analysis with results for Newcastle–Ottawa Scale tool is presented in Supplementary Tables and Figures. c: OIS criterion is not met and 95% CI overlaps no effect. d: OIS criterion is not met. e: 95% CI overlaps no effect.