Table 12.
Clinical Questions | Recommendations | Strength and Quality |
---|---|---|
Should continuous antibiotic prophylaxis be used in all children with a previous UTI? | Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely indicated in all children after the first episode of UTI. | Strong recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: B |
Should continuous antibiotic prophylaxis be used in all children with a history of recurrent UTIs? | A history of recurrent UTIs without underlying urological anomalies does not constitute a sufficient indication for continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. | Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
Short-term prophylaxis may be considered until the exclusion of urological anomalies. | Weak recommendation for the intervention. Expert opinion |
|
Should continuous antibiotic prophylaxis be used in all children with VUR of any grade? | Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for children with low-grade (I–II) or non-dilating VUR. | Strong recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: B |
Close surveillance based on early diagnosis (i.e., urinalysis and urine culture) and prompt antibiotic therapy in symptomatic/febrile children may be considered in children with VUR of any grade. | Weak recommendation. Expert opinion |
|
Should continuous antibiotic prophylaxis be used in all children with high-grade VUR (III–V)? | Considering the lack of effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the risk of renal scarring, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in children with high-grade (III–IV) or dilating VUR. | Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: B |
Close surveillance based on early diagnosis (i.e., urinalysis and urine culture) and prompt antibiotic therapy in symptomatic/febrile children is recommended in children with VUR of any grade. | Weak recommendation. Expert opinion |
|
Should antibiotic prophylaxis be used in children with isolated hydronephrosis? | Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in children with isolated antenatal or postnatal hydronephrosis or ureteropelvic junction obstruction. | Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
Should antibiotic prophylaxis be used in children with infravesical obstructions (i.e., urethral valves)? | There is no sufficient evidence to define the efficacy and safety of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in children with infravesical obstructions. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis may be considered until surgical correction. |
Weak recommendation for the intervention. Expert opinion |
Should antibiotic prophylaxis be used in children with hydroureteronephrosis (i.e., primary obstructive megaureter)? | Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis may be considered in children with hydroureteronephrosis and ureteral dilation > 7 mm or primary obstructive megaureter. | Weak recommendation for the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
Should antibiotic prophylaxis be used in children with neurogenic bladder? | Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in children affected by neurogenic bladder. | Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
Proper execution of clean intermittent catheterization and close surveillance, based on early diagnosis (i.e., urinalysis and urine culture) and prompt antibiotic therapy in symptomatic/febrile children, may be considered in children with neurogenic bladder. | Weak recommendation. Expert opinion |
|
Which antibiotic should be preferred for long-term prophylaxis of UTI in children? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole rather than nitrofurantoin as the first-choice prophylactic antibiotic. There is no evidence on the efficacy and safety of amoxicillin–clavulanic acid as a prophylactic antibiotic to prevent UTIs. The prophylactic use of oral cephalosporins is not suggested due to the high risk of new antimicrobial resistances |
Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
Should the prophylactic antibiotic be changed after a breakthrough UTI in children already on prophylaxis? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend changing the prophylactic antibiotic after a breakthrough UTI in children already on prophylaxis. | Weak recommendation. Evidence quality: D |
Which dosage should be preferred for continuous antibiotic prophylaxis? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific dose for continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Doses from one-quarter to one-third of the standard treatment dosage may be appropriate |
Weak recommendation. Expert opinion |
Should antibiotic prophylaxis be continued in children undergoing pyeloplasty? | In the absence of other persistent risk factors, antibiotic prophylaxis may be discontinued after pyeloplasty. | Weak recommendation against the intervention. Evidence quality: C |
How long should antibiotic prophylaxis be continued in children undergoing ablation of posterior urethral valves? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend how long antibiotic prophylaxis should be continued after ablation of posterior urethral valves. | |
How long should antibiotic prophylaxis be continued in children undergoing ureteral reimplantation? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend how long antibiotic prophylaxis should be continued after ureteral reimplantation. | |
How long should antibiotic prophylaxis be continued in children undergoing endoscopic treatment of VUR? | There is insufficient evidence to recommend how long antibiotic prophylaxis should be continued in children undergoing endoscopic treatment of VUR. According to recommendations 3 and 4, antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in children with VUR of any grade. |