Skip to main content
. 2023 May 23;13(6):842. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060842

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Meta-analysis of statistically significant outcomes from the systematic review analysis comparing endoscopic endonasal approach vs. open transcranial approach for craniopharyngioma management (Madsen, 2016 [32], Jeswani, 2015 [11], Moussazadeh, 2016 [12], Wannemuehler, 2016 [15], Marx, 2020 [25], Javadopour, 2020 [26], Nie, 2022 [29], Li, 2019 [30]). (A). Analysis comparing the rates of visual improvement between both interventions. (B). Risk evaluation of post-surgical permanent diabetes insipidus. (C). Risk evaluation of post-surgical hypopituitarism. (D). Risk evaluation of post-surgical CSF Leak. (E). Risk evaluation of post-surgical meningitis (all causes). (F). Comparison of recurrence rates.