Table 2.
Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Total (n = 182) | |||
CTDIvol (mGy) | 15.3 [7.3–28.5] | 15.3 [7.3–28.5] | NS |
DLP (mGy*cm) | 191 [103–314] | 198 [94–345] | p < 0.001 |
Effective dose (mSv) | 3.2 [1.8–5.3] | 3.4 [1.5–5.9] | p < 0.001 |
Sequential scan mode (n = 150) | |||
CTDIvol (mGy) | 18.4 [10.9–31] | 18.4 [10.9–31] | NS |
DLP (mGy*cm) | 214 [138–359] | 227 [141–385] | p < 0.001 |
Effective dose (mSv) | 3.6 [2.3–6.1] | 3.9 [2.4–6.5] | p < 0.001 |
High-pitch spiral scan mode (n = 32) | |||
CTDIvol (mGy) | 3.3 [3.0–5.8] | 3.3 [3.0–5.8] | NS |
DLP (mGy*cm) | 57 [48–88] | 48 [40–80] | p < 0.001 |
Effective dose (mSv) | 1.0 [0.8–1.5] | 0.8 [0.6–1.4] | p < 0.001 |
Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges given in square brackets, as appropriate. Abbreviations: CAS-CT, calcium-scoring computed tomography; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; DLP, dose length product; CTDIvol, computed tomography dose index; NS, non-significant. Notes: Scenario 1 incorporates the radiation dose of calcium-scoring CT (DLP 20 [16–22] mGy*cm) and calcium-scoring CT-derived CCTA, whereas Scenario 2 incorporates only the radiation dose of scout-view-derived CCTA.