Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;13(12):2062. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122062

Table 2.

Assessment of Radiation Dose.

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 p-Value
Total (n = 182)
CTDIvol (mGy) 15.3 [7.3–28.5] 15.3 [7.3–28.5] NS
DLP (mGy*cm) 191 [103–314] 198 [94–345] p < 0.001
Effective dose (mSv) 3.2 [1.8–5.3] 3.4 [1.5–5.9] p < 0.001
Sequential scan mode (n = 150)
CTDIvol (mGy) 18.4 [10.9–31] 18.4 [10.9–31] NS
DLP (mGy*cm) 214 [138–359] 227 [141–385] p < 0.001
Effective dose (mSv) 3.6 [2.3–6.1] 3.9 [2.4–6.5] p < 0.001
High-pitch spiral scan mode (n = 32)
CTDIvol (mGy) 3.3 [3.0–5.8] 3.3 [3.0–5.8] NS
DLP (mGy*cm) 57 [48–88] 48 [40–80] p < 0.001
Effective dose (mSv) 1.0 [0.8–1.5] 0.8 [0.6–1.4] p < 0.001

Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges given in square brackets, as appropriate. Abbreviations: CAS-CT, calcium-scoring computed tomography; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; DLP, dose length product; CTDIvol, computed tomography dose index; NS, non-significant. Notes: Scenario 1 incorporates the radiation dose of calcium-scoring CT (DLP 20 [16–22] mGy*cm) and calcium-scoring CT-derived CCTA, whereas Scenario 2 incorporates only the radiation dose of scout-view-derived CCTA.