TABLE 2.
Factors associated with probable pre‐receptive ERA results.
| Crude | [95% CI] | p | Adjusted | [95% CI] | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | |||||
| Patient age (years) | 1.11 | [1.03–1.19] | 0.0018 | 1.08 | [1.01–1.16] | 0.0351 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.06 | [0.96–1.16] | 0.2834 | 1.06 | [0.95–1.18] | 0.3570 |
| EMMA results | 0.0115 | 0.0376 | ||||
| Pattern 1 | 1 | [Reference] | 1 | [Reference] | ||
| Pattern 2 | 0.49 | [0.05–4.54] | 0.5044 | 0.50 | [0.05–4.77] | 0.5232 |
| Pattern 3 | 3.04 | [1.10–8.40] | 0.0290 | 2.62 | [0.92–7.38] | 0.0656 |
| Pattern 4 | 2.00 | [0.78–5.13] | 0.1429 | 1.86 | [0.71–4.87] | 0.2016 |
| Pattern 5 | 4.27 | [1.72–10.61] | 0.0010 | 3.82 | [1.49–9.82] | 0.0039 |
Note: Crude data based on single logistic regression analyses; adjusted data based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Significance of parameters tested using the p‐values of respective Wald tests. The values of Patterns 2–5 in the EMMA results were based on Pattern 1 as a reference.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; EMMA, endometrial microbiome metagenomic analysis; ERA, endometrial receptivity analysis; OR, odds ratio.