Abstract
Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are two of the main BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by abnormal megakaryocytic proliferation. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) mutations are detected in 50–60% of ET and PMF, while myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) virus oncogene mutations are present in 3–5% of cases. While Sanger sequencing is a valuable diagnostic tool to discriminate the most common MPN mutations, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a more sensitive technology that also identifies concurrent genetic alterations. In this report, we describe two MPN patients with simultaneous double MPL mutations: a woman with ET presenting both MPLV501A-W515R and JAK2V617F mutations and a man with PMF displaying an uncommon double MPLV501A-W515L. Using colony-forming assays and NGS analyses, we define the origin and mutational landscape of these two unusual malignancies and uncover further gene alterations that may contribute to the pathogenesis of ET and PMF.
Keywords: essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, MPLV501A-W515L, JAK2V617F, cis mutations
1. Introduction
Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are two of the main BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Over 70% of ET and PMF patients display a specific genetic alteration: 56% present Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) mutations, 20–25% exhibit calreticulin (CALR) alterations, and 3–5% show nucleotide substitutions in the myeloproliferative leukemia (MPL) virus oncogene [1,2,3].
JAK2 is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase that contributes to myeloid cell proliferation and differentiation [4,5]. When JAK2 displays the common V617F mutation, the ensuing protein acquires constitutive catalytic activity even in the absence of cytokine stimulation [6]. CALR is an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein. The main mutations consist of insertions or deletions in exon 9, resulting in a positively charged C-terminus. The mutant CALR forms a stable complex with the thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) upregulating the JAK/STAT pathway [7]. The MPL gene encodes for TPO-R. Excessive TPO-R activation promotes megakaryocytic hyperplasia and bone marrow fibrosis [8,9]. The most frequently reported MPL mutation involves the W515 residue on exon 10 [10].
Double MPL mutations have been previously described but represent an extremely infrequent event [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Ma et al. identified an MPLW515L mutation associated with the S505N substitution [12,13]. Pietra and colleagues detected double MPL mutations in three subjects: two ET patients, one presenting the S505C-W515L double mutation and the other with the V501A-W515R sequence alteration, and an individual with PMF displaying the V501A-W515L mutations [11]. However, the presence of additional genetic alterations possibly contributing to disease initiation and progression was not investigated [16,17,18]. Furthermore, these reports failed to establish if the observed genetic alterations were in cis (on the same allele) or in trans (on two different alleles) [11,19].
In this report, we describe two patients diagnosed with MPNs expressing two concurrent MPL mutations identified by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) that were investigated for the presence of additional genetic alterations in order to discern the possible clonal evolution of their disease.
2. Case Presentation
2.1. Case 1
In May 2017, a 57-year-old woman presenting ischemic symptoms was admitted to the Hematology Unit of the A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco” in Catania with a high platelet count (807 × 109/L) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical data of patient 1 at diagnosis.
| Clinical Data of Patient 1 | |
|---|---|
| Age | 57 |
| Gender | female |
| Platelet count | 807 × 109/L |
| Hemoglobin level | 12.8 g/dL |
| Red blood Cells (RBC) | 4.13 × 109/L |
| White blood Cells (WBC) | 6.58 × 109/L |
| Liver and spleen dimension | N.I. |
| Other diseases | ischemic colitis, splenic aneurysm, and retinal vascular occlusion |
Following the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [20], the patient was assessed for the presence of JAK2 and CALR mutations by Sanger sequencing (SS). In particular, the genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from 1.7 mL of peripheral blood (PB) using the Qiasymphony DSP DNA Midi kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For both analyses, we performed a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using 300 ng of gDNA. To amplify exon 14 of JAK2, we employed the forward (FW) primer 5′-GGGTTTCCTCAGAACGTTGA-3′ and the reverse (RV) primer 5′-TCATTGCTTTCCTTTTTCACAA-3′. To amplify exon 9 of CALR, we employed the FW 5′-CCTGCAGGCAGCAGAGAAAC-3′ and the RV 5′-ACAGAGACATTATTTGGCGCG-3′ primers. The PCR conditions consist of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, then 35 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 45 s), annealing (57 °C for 30 s for JAK2; 56.5 °C for 30 s for CALR), extension (72 °C for 30 s), and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The final PCR products (460 bp for JAK2 and 288 bp for CALR) were loaded on an agarose gel in TAE 1.2%, purified, and sequenced by SS using the same FW primers employed for the PCR. Both sequencing results were negative for the presence of mutations in the two genes.
Subsequently, we tested the gDNA of the patient for the presence of MPL mutations on exon 10. In particular, 700 ng of gDNA were employed to perform a PCR using the FW 5′-AGTAGGGGCTGGCTGGATGA-3′ and the RV 5′-TGCCTGTTTACAGGCCTTCG-3′ primers. The Hot Start PCR conditions consist of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, then 80 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (60.2 °C for 50 s), extension (72 °C for 30 s), and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The final PCR product of 235 bp was loaded on an agarose gel in TAE 1.2%, purified, and sequenced by SS using the same FW primer employed for the PCR. Sequencing of the MPL gene revealed a V501A (c.1502T>C) substitution (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Electropherogram obtained by Sanger sequencing of the MPL gene obtained by DNA extracted from the peripheral blood of patient 1.
The patient underwent a bone marrow (BM) aspiration that revealed megakaryocytic hyperplasia and grade 1 fibrosis. Eight months later (February 2018), she still presented a high platelet count (931 × 109/L). A second BM biopsy confirmed her ET diagnosis. Spleen size was normal.
To better analyze the molecular profile of this patient, we performed an NGS analysis. The sensitivity of NGS is much greater than that of SS, as it is able to detect mutant alleles with a frequency lower than 1%, while SS has a limit of detection around 20%. We analyzed the DNA isolated from the patient’s PB and BM, employing the Ion Ampliseq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as previously reported [21]. This NGS panel consists of 207 primer pairs covering approximately 2.800 COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) mutations from 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Sequences were analyzed with the Ion Reporter software version 5.16 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Variants with coverage lower than 100× and an allele frequency (AF) lower than 5% were filtered out. In the PB sample, our analysis identified both the V501A and the W515R mutations, the latter not detected by SS since it was expressed with a variant allele frequency (VAF) < 20% (14.36%) (Table 2). The NGS analyses performed on the BM confirmed both MPL mutations with a VAF of 100%. We also detected 5 additional hotspot mutations: JAK2V617F (VAF 39.77%), PTENQ17H (VAF 27.88%), TP53H178Tfs*69 (VAF 11.5%), PIK3CAN1044D (VAF 6.02%), and KITN566T (VAF 1.62%) (Table 2). The relatively low VAF of the JAK2 mutation (39.77%) might explain why this alteration was not detected in her PB, as it may have been expressed in a limited number of neoplastic clones in the PB.
Table 2.
Hotspot mutations detected by NGS in the specified samples of patient 1.
| Gene | Coding | Protein | Cosmic ID | Type of Mutation | VAF% | Fathmm Prediction Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA from peripheral blood | ||||||
| MPL | c.1502T>C | p.V501A | COSM86964 | Substitution-Missense | 27.36 | Neutral (0.40) |
| MPL | c.1543T>A | p.W515R | COSM29008 | Substitution-Missense | 14.36 | Pathogenic (0.54) |
| DNA from bone marrow | ||||||
| MPL | c.1502T>C | p.V501A | COSM86964 | Substitution-Missense | 100 | Neutral (0.40) |
| MPL | c.1543T>A | p.W515R | COSM29008 | Substitution-Missense | 100 | Pathogenic (0.54) |
| JAK2 | c.1849G>T | p.V617F | COSM12600 | Substitution-Missense | 39.77 | Pathogenic (0.94) |
| PTEN | c.51A>C | p.Q17H | Novel | Substitution –Missense | 27.88 | - |
| TP53 | c.532delC | p. H178Tfs*69 | COSM43978 | Deletion Frameshift | 11.5 | n/a |
| PIK3CA | c.3130A>G | p.N1044D | COSM27134 | Substitution-Missense | 6.02 | Pathogenic (0.96) |
| KIT | c.1697A>C | p.N566T | COSM9233350 | Substitution-Missense | 1.62 | Pathogenic (0.97) |
2.2. Case 2
In October 2018, a 68-year-old man was referred to the Hematology Unit of the A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco” in Catania with high white blood cell (102 × 109/L) and platelet (785 × 109/L) counts (Table 3).
Table 3.
Clinical data of patient 2 at diagnosis.
| Clinical Data of Patient 2 | |
|---|---|
| Age | 68 |
| Gender | male |
| Platelet count | 785 × 109/L |
| Hemoglobin level | 12.5 g/dL |
| Red blood Cells (RBC) | 4.25 × 109/L |
| White blood Cells (WBC) | 102 × 109/L |
| Liver and spleen dimension | mild splenomegaly |
| Other diseases | hypertension and diabetes mellitus |
He was promptly subjected to mutational screening by SS for the expression of the JAK2V617F substitution, but the test was negative as it was for CALR mutations. Subsequent analyses for additional genetic alterations detected the presence of two mutations on the MPL gene: V501A (c.1502T>C) and W515L (c.1544G>T) (Figure 2a). The BM biopsy showed granulocyte hyperplasia and megakaryocyte clustering with moderate (grade 1) fibrosis, and, on this basis, the diagnosis of early PMF was formulated. A mild splenomegaly was detected (longitudinal diameter: 13 cm).
Figure 2.
Sanger sequencing and colony-forming assays for the identification of MPL mutations. (a) Electropherogram obtained by Sanger sequencing of the MPL gene obtained by DNA extracted from the peripheral blood of patient 2. (b) Histogram indicating the distribution of BFU-Es and CFU-GMs obtained from the BM biopsy of patient 2: wild-type (WT) colonies are shown in white; colonies within the cis-double MPLV501A-W515L mutation are in gray; colonies with the single W515L mutation are in black.
To establish if the detected double mutations were in cis or in trans, we carried out the clonal selection of Burst-Forming Units-Erythroid (BFU-E) and Colony-Forming Units-Granulocyte and Monocyte (CFU-GM), followed by SS on the DNA extracted from these colonies. In detail, 1 × 105 primary mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from BM biopsies by density gradient centrifugation. For the colony-forming assay, MNCs were plated at a density of 10.000 cells/mL (in triplicate) in Methocult H4435 (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, B.C., Canada) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 12 days. Forty individual colonies (20 BFU-E and 20 CFU-GM) were plucked and transferred into PCR tubes for DNA extraction by thermic lysing (94° for 10 min). Subsequently, DNA was subjected to the same PCR described above for the amplification of MPL exon 10 and sequenced by SS [22]. Twelve out of 20 BFU-E colonies carried the heterozygous cis V501A-W515L mutations, while the remaining 8 exhibited the wild-type gene (Figure 2b). Of the 20 CFU-GM colonies, only 4 were positive (in cis) for the double mutation, while the remaining 16 were wild-type (13 colonies) or only expressed the W515L substitution (3 colonies) (Figure 2b). These data suggest a more significant heterogeneity in CFU-GM compared to BFU-E colonies and the existence of two distinct clones carrying different mutations (single or double in cis) [23].
To further analyze the genetic profile of the disease and understand its possible clinical evolution, we performed an NGS analysis on the DNA obtained from the PB of the patient, employing the same procedures described above. Sequencing data confirmed both the V501A and the W515L mutations with a VAF of 38.5% and 34.4%, respectively. The analysis also detected the KITM541L mutation (VAF 59.7%), frequently reported in mastocytosis and chronic eosinophilic leukemia [3,24,25] (Table 4).
Table 4.
Hotspot mutations detected by NGS in the DNA from the peripheral blood of patient 2.
| Gene | Coding | Protein | Cosmic ID | Type of Mutation | VAF% | Fathmm Prediction Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPL | c.1502T>C | p.V501A | COSM86964 | Substitution-Missense | 38.5 | Neutral (0.40) |
| MPL | c.1544G>T | p.W515L | COSM18918 | Substitution-Missense | 34.4 | Pathogenic (0.70) |
| KIT | c.1621A>C | p.M541L | COSM28026 | Substitution-Missense | 59.7 | Pathogenic (0.74) |
3. Discussion
In the setting of myeloproliferative diseases, knowledge about gene mutations increasingly plays a leading role. In all the newly developed prognostic models, unfavorable mutations in several genes are considered central to establishing the prognosis [26]. Gene analysis has become a widely used procedure that has made it possible to identify cases of concurrent alterations, possibly also for the same gene. In this setting, double mutations in the MPL gene are extremely uncommon in patients affected by BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs [11,12,13]. In our cohort of patients, diagnosed from 2012 to date, the frequency of MPL mutations is around 3% (44 out of 1244 total patients), and of these, only the two patients reported in this work presented a double mutation on the gene. Likewise, concurrent mutations in JAK2 and MPL are rare but can co-exist in subjects with ET or with myelofibrosis exhibiting myeloid metaplasia [27,28]. Indeed, the first case reported in this paper is the only one in our cohort.
Sanger sequencing and NGS are currently used to investigate the mutational profile of MPN patients. Sanger sequencing is the least sensitive technique and can discern double mutations only if they are expressed at or above the 20% threshold. However, SS may help discriminate between cis and trans mutations after clonal selection of single BFU-E or CFU-GM colonies. On the contrary, NGS analyzes multiple genetic regions with a sensitive limit of detection (i.e., <1%) and high accuracy, discerning nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, copy number variations, and fusion transcripts [29].
We report an ET patient simultaneously carrying the V501A and the W515R mutations. Next-generation sequencing analysis of her BM biopsy also detected a JAK2V617F alteration. The lower frequency of the JAK2 substitution (39.77%) in the BM compared to MPL (100%) might explain the absence of the former alteration in the patient’s PB and suggest progressive disease evolution from a pre-existing dominant MPL-mutated clone [30]. The second case concerns a PMF patient with a rare MPLV501A-W515L double mutation, likely generated in cis by a hematopoietic precursor mostly differentiating along the erythroid lineage. While the MPLW515L mutation is known to promote EPO-independent activation of the receptor [31], the pathogenic role of the V501A substitution is still unclear. Recently, Bridgford reported that the non-canonical V501A MPL mutation causes cytokine-independent growth in Ba/F3 cells [32], which could contribute to the disease’s pathogenesis.
To date, the presence of numerous (ET patient) or limited (PMF patient) additional genetic alterations has not yet translated into a more aggressive disease, as both patients are currently in excellent clinical conditions while only receiving 100 mg daily acetylsalicylic acid for thromboembolic event prophylaxis, with a follow-up of more than 5 years since diagnosis. However, the employment of a new commercially available NGS panel specific for MPNs or myelodysplastic syndromes could be of great interest to explore other novel genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Indeed, we recently extended NGS analysis in MPNs using a DNA/RNA panel including 40 genes and 29 fusion transcripts involved in myeloid malignancies. This new NGS panel is of great interest as it is able to confirm the diagnosis and discriminate genetic profiles involved in clonal evolution and disease progression of MPN/MDS.
In conclusion, NGS analyses coupled with colony-forming assays allow the characterization of the molecular landscape and clonal evolution of MPN patients with uncommon genetic mutations. A longer follow-up will be required to address the prognostic impact of this information.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.S.P. and S.D.G.; formal analysis, M.S.P., S.D.G., E.T. and C.R.; data curation, M.S.P., S.D.G., E.T., C.R., A.D. and B.G.; writing-original draft preparation, M.S.P. and S.D.G.; writing—review and editing, G.G., L.M. and G.A.P.; supervision, G.A.P. and P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-San Marco” (protocol code 54/2022/PO).
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the authors upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
G.A.P.: honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis; P.V.: honoraria from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Ely-Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Palumbo G.A., Stella S., Pennisi M.S., Pirosa C., Fermo E., Fabris S., Cattaneo D., Iurlo A. The Role of New Technologies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:321. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guglielmelli P., Vannucchi A.M. Current management strategies for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Blood Rev. 2020;42:100714. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pandey R., Kapur R. Targeting phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:118. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0388-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hammaren H.M., Virtanen A.T., Abraham B.G., Peussa H., Hubbard S.R., Silvennoinen O. Janus kinase 2 activation mechanisms revealed by analysis of suppressing mutations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;143:1549–1559.e1546. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jang M.A., Choi C.W. Recent insights regarding the molecular basis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2020;35:1–11. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O’Sullivan J., Mead A.J. Heterogeneity in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Causes and consequences. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2019;71:55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.How J., Hobbs G.S., Mullally A. Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2019;134:2242–2248. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Plo I., Bellanne-Chantelot C., Mosca M., Mazzi S., Marty C., Vainchenker W. Genetic Alterations of the Thrombopoietin/MPL/JAK2 Axis Impacting Megakaryopoiesis. Front. Endocrinol. 2017;8:234. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.He X., Chen Z., Jiang Y., Qiu X., Zhao X. Different mutations of the human c-mpl gene indicate distinct haematopoietic diseases. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2013;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vainchenker W., Kralovics R. Genetic basis and molecular pathophysiology of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2017;129:667–679. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-695940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pietra D., Brisci A., Rumi E., Boggi S., Elena C., Pietrelli A., Bordoni R., Ferrari M., Passamonti F., De Bellis G., et al. Deep sequencing reveals double mutations in cis of MPL exon 10 in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Haematologica. 2011;96:607–611. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.034793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma W., Zhang X., Wang X., Zhang Z., Yeh C.H., Uyeji J., Albitar M. MPL mutation profile in JAK2 mutation-negative patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2011;20:34–39. doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181ecd261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elsayed A.G., Ranavaya A., Jamil M.O. MPL Y252H anMd PL F126fs mutations in essential thrombocythemia: Case series and review of literature. Hematol. Rep. 2019;11:7868. doi: 10.4081/hr.2019.7868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grinfeld J., Nangalia J., Baxter E.J., Wedge D.C., Angelopoulos N., Cantrill R., Godfrey A.L., Papaemmanuil E., Gundem G., MacLean C., et al. Classification and Personalized Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:1416–1430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sugimoto Y., Nagaharu K., Ohishi K., Nakamura M., Ikejiri M., Nakatani K., Mizutani M., Tamaki S., Ikeda T., Tawara I., et al. MPL exon 10 mutations other than canonical MPL W515L/K mutations identified by in-house MPL exon 10 direct sequencing in essential thrombocythemia. Int. J. Hematol. 2021;113:618–621. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03134-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Usseglio F., Beaufils N., Calleja A., Raynaud S., Gabert J. Detection of CALR and MPL Mutations in Low Allelic Burden JAK2 V617F Essential Thrombocythemia. J. Mol. Diagn. 2017;19:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin Y., Liu E., Sun Q., Ma J., Li Q., Cao Z., Wang J., Jia Y., Zhang H., Song Z., et al. The Prevalence of JAK2, MPL, and CALR Mutations in Chinese Patients with BCR-ABL1-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015;144:165–171. doi: 10.1309/AJCPALP51XDIXDDV. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Magor G.W., Tallack M.R., Klose N.M., Taylor D., Korbie D., Mollee P., Trau M., Perkins A.C. Rapid Molecular Profiling of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Using Targeted Exon Resequencing of 86 Genes Involved in JAK-STAT Signaling and Epigenetic Regulation. J. Mol. Diagn. 2016;18:707–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tashkandi H., Moore E.M., Tomlinson B., Goebel T., Sadri N. Co-occurrence of type I CALR and two MPL mutations in patient with primary myelofibrosis. Ann. Hematol. 2017;96:1417–1418. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barbui T., Thiele J., Gisslinger H., Kvasnicka H.M., Vannucchi A.M., Guglielmelli P., Orazi A., Tefferi A. The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: Document summary and in-depth discussion. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:15. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0054-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Romano C., Di Gregorio S., Pennisi M.S., Tirro E., Broggi G., Caltabiano R., Manzella L., Ruggieri M., Vigneri P., Di Cataldo A. Multiple primary malignances managed with surgical excision: A case report with next generation sequencing analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022;49:9059–9064. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07630-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beer P.A., Campbell P.J., Scott L.M., Bench A.J., Erber W.N., Bareford D., Wilkins B.S., Reilly J.T., Hasselbalch H.C., Bowman R., et al. MPL mutations in myeloproliferative disorders: Analysis of the PT-1 cohort. Blood. 2008;112:141–149. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-131664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chaligne R., James C., Tonetti C., Besancenot R., Le Couedic J.P., Fava F., Mazurier F., Godin I., Maloum K., Larbret F., et al. Evidence for MPL W515L/K mutations in hematopoietic stem cells in primitive myelofibrosis. Blood. 2007;110:3735–3743. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-089003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Foster R., Byrnes E., Meldrum C., Griffith R., Ross G., Upjohn E., Braue A., Scott R., Varigos G., Ferrao P., et al. Association of paediatric mastocytosis with a polymorphism resulting in an amino acid substitution (M541L) in the transmembrane domain of c-KIT. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008;159:1160–1169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iurlo A., Gianelli U., Beghini A., Spinelli O., Orofino N., Lazzaroni F., Cambiaghi S., Intermesoli T., Rambaldi A., Cortelezzi A. Identification of kit(M541L) somatic mutation in chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified and its implication in low-dose imatinib response. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4665–4670. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Duminuco A., Nardo A., Giuffrida G., Leotta S., Markovic U., Giallongo C., Tibullo D., Romano A., Di Raimondo F., Palumbo G.A. Myelofibrosis and Survival Prognostic Models: A Journey between Past and Future. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:2188. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pardanani A.D., Levine R.L., Lasho T., Pikman Y., Mesa R.A., Wadleigh M., Steensma D.P., Elliott M.A., Wolanskyj A.P., Hogan W.J., et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: A study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–3476. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-018879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lasho T.L., Pardanani A., McClure R.F., Mesa R.A., Levine R.L., Gilliland D.G., Tefferi A. Concurrent MPL515 and JAK2V617F mutations in myelofibrosis: Chronology of clonal emergence and changes in mutant allele burden over time. Br. J. Haematol. 2006;135:683–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Serrati S., De Summa S., Pilato B., Petriella D., Lacalamita R., Tommasi S., Pinto R. Next-generation sequencing: Advances and applications in cancer diagnosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:7355–7365. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S99807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nielsen C., Bojesen S.E., Nordestgaard B.G., Kofoed K.F., Birgens H.S. JAK2V617F somatic mutation in the general population: Myeloproliferative neoplasm development and progression rate. Haematologica. 2014;99:1448–1455. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.107631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Langabeer S.E., Andrikovics H., Asp J., Bellosillo B., Carillo S., Haslam K., Kjaer L., Lippert E., Mansier O., Oppliger Leibundgut E., et al. Molecular diagnostics of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Eur. J. Haematol. 2015;95:270–279. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bridgford J.L., Lee S.M., Lee C.M.M., Guglielmelli P., Rumi E., Pietra D., Wilcox S., Chhabra Y., Rubin A.F., Cazzola M., et al. Novel drivers and modifiers of MPL-dependent oncogenic transformation identified by deep mutational scanning. Blood. 2020;135:287–292. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the authors upon request.


