Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 18;24(12):10295. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210295

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Antibacterial activity of extracts obtained from curdlan-based biomaterials improved with crude extract (CE) (a,b) and xanthohumol (XN) (c,d). * Significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from polystyrene (PS)—control of the experiment. # Significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from control biomaterial (Cur); @ significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_0.125 biomaterial (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.0156 biomaterial (c,d); ^ significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_0.25 (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.0313 biomaterial (c,d); & significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_0.5 (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.0625 biomaterial (c,d); ! significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_1 (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.125 biomaterial (c,d); $ significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_2 (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.25 biomaterial (c,d); % significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_4 (a,b) or Cur_XN_0.5 biomaterial (c,d); ? significantly different results compared to results obtained for extracts from Cur_CE_8 (a,b) or Cur_XN_1 biomaterial (c,d); one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison, p < 0.05.