Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 18;12(12):4113. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124113

Table A1.

Characteristics of the experimental placebo–nocebo studies included in this paper.

Paper ID Sample Size
(M, F, Not Analysed) *
Population Type Pain Type/Pain Induction Investigated Outcome Outcome Measure Level of Significance
Amanzio and Benedetti, 1999 [20] 229 (132, 97) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) Pain tolerance (min) p < 0.05
Amanzio et al., 2001 [21] 364 (278 patients;
86 healthy controls)
Patients (thoracic surgery) and healthy controls Postoperative pain; experimental ischemic arm pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 1995 [40] 93 (52, 41) Patients (thoracotomy for lung surgery) Post-surgery pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) NRS (0–10) p < 0.02
Benedetti et al., 1996 [39] 340 (154, 186) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral
(Pharmacological)
NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 1997 [38] 180 (119, 61) Patients (video-assisted thoracoscopy) Post-surgery pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 2006 [42] 49 (23, 26) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 2006 [86] 44 (28 patients (11, 17), 16 controls) Patients (Alzheimer’s disease) and healthy subjects Burning pain after venipuncture Electrophysiological (EEG) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 2010 [41] 40 (20, 20) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) Tolerance time p < 0.05
Benedetti et al., 2011 [36] 82 (41, 41) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) Tolerance time 95%CI
Benedetti et al., 2014 [54] 74 (30, 44) Healthy subjects Hypobaric hypoxia headache Behavioral (Pharmacological) NRS (0–10) 95%CI
Benedetti et al., 2022 [37] 149 (82, 67) Healthy subjects Experimental ischemic pain Behavioral (Pharmacological) 0–10 rating scale p < 0.05
Bingel et al. 2011 [85] 22 (15, 7) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Bingel et al., 2022 [100] 22 (15, 7) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging;
functional connectivity (fMRI)
VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Bush et al., 2021 [95] 37 (12, 25) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging;
functional connectivity (fMRI)
VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Camerone et al., 2021 [16] 166 (78, 88, 9) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Camerone et al., 2021 [17] 77 (24, 24, 29) Healthy subjects Cold pressor test (CPT) Behavioral Numerical Pain Intensity (0–100) p < 0.05
Camerone et al., 2022 [18] 51 (24, 27, 10) Healthy subjects Cold pressor test (CPT) Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Carlino et al., 2015 [73] 34 (20, 14) Healthy subjects Laser stimulation Electrophysiology (EEG) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Carlino et al., 2016 [26] 80 (34, 46) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Colloca et al., 2006 [24] 30 (5, 25) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Colloca et al., 2008 [21] 116 (0, 116) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Colloca et al., 2010 [25] 46 (16, 30) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral VAS (0–10 p < 0.05
Colloca et al., 2016 [50] 109 (55, 54, 1) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Behavioral VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Colloca et al., 2019 [105] 160 (58, 102) Healthy subjects Electrical and heat stimuli DNA genotyping; epistasis VAS (0–10) p < 0.001
Colloca et al., 2020 [121] 763 (363 patients (85, 278); 400 healthy controls (162; 238) Patients (chronic orofacial pain) and healthy subjects Heat stimuli Behavioral VAS p < 0.05
Disley et al., 2021 [30] 104 (10, 65, 29) Healthy subjects Cold pressor test (CPT) Behavioral VAS (0–100) p = 0.05
Eippert et al., 2009 [34] 48 (48, -, 8) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p ≤ 0.05
Eippert et al., 2009 [92] 15 (15, 0) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Ellerbrock et al., 2015 [35] 40 (20, 20, 1) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging; functional connectivity (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Fuentes et al., 2014 [164] 117 Patients (chronic low back pain) - Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Hashmi et al., 2014 [91] 42 Patients (chronic knee osteoarthritis) Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) Gracely Sensory Scale (0–20) p < 0.05
Jarcho et al., 2016 [46] 15 (0, 15) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (PET; fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.005
Kaptchuk et al., 2008 [111] 262 (63, 199) Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) - Behavioral Global improvement scale (range 1–7); adequate relief of symptoms; symptom severity p < 0.01
Kelley et al., 2009 [165] 189 Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) - Behavioral Combined outcome (IBS Symptom Severity Scale; IBS Quality of Like Scale; IBS Global Improvement Scale; IBS Adequate Relief) p < 0.05
Kessner et al., 2013 [51] 80 (80, 0) Healthy subjects Heat pain Behavioral (Pharmacological)
Visual Analogue Scale (0–100) p < 0.05
Klinger et al., 2017 [112] 48 (12, 36) Patients (chronic back pain) Electrical stimuli Behavioral NRS (0–10) 95% CI
Kong et al., 2006 [57] 24 (13, 11) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) 0–20 Sensory Box Scale p < 0.0001 for ROI
p = 0.05
Kong et al., 2008 [71] 20 (5, 8, 7) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) Gracely Sensory and Affective Scales p < 0.05
Koyama et al., 2005 [70] 10 (8, 2) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS p < 0.01
Krummenacher et al., 2010 [87] 40 (40, 0) Healthy subjects Heat pain rTMS VAS (0–10) p ≤ 0.05
Kube et al., 2020 [29] 117 (48, 53, 16) Healthy subjects Heat pain Behavioral Pain tolerance p < 0.05
Lieberman et al., 2004 [58] 52 (29 active drug; 23 placebo condition) Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) - Neuroimaging (PET) Symptom diary (4 weeks) p < 0.005
Malfiet et al., 2019 [79] 83 Patients (chronic neck pain) - Behavioral VAS (0–100) p = 0.05
Martins et al., 2022 [125] 56 Patients (chronic knee osteoarthritis) - Neuroimaging; functional connectivity (fMRI) VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Morton et al., 2010 [74] 67 (21, 35, 11) Healthy subjects Laser stimulation Electrophysiological (EEG) 0–10 scale p = 0.05
Müller et al., 2016 [118] 50 (27, 32, 1) Patients (chronic pain) Pressure-pain stimuli Behavioral VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Olson et al., 2021 [113] 280 (65, 215) Patients (chronic orofacial pain) Heat pain Behavioral VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Peciña et al., 2015 [106] 50 (21, 29) Healthy subjects 5% hypertonic saline DNA genotyping; Neuroimaging (PET) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Petrovic et al., 2002 [60] 9 Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (PET) VAS (0–100) p = 0.005
Petrovic et al., 2010 [59] 24 (9, 15) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (PET; fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Piedimonte et al., 2017 [23] 34(16, 18, -) Healthy subject Electrical stimuli Electrophysiological (EEG) NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Ploghaus et al., 1999 [67] 12 (7, 5) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Pollo et al., 2001 [81] 38 Patients (thoracotomized patients) - Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.01
Porro et al., 2002 [69] 30 (10, 16, 4) Healthy subjects Acid solution injection Neuroimaging (fMRI) 0–100 scale rating p < 0.05
Price et al., 1999 [162] 40 (16, 24) Healthy subjects Heat pain Behavioral VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Price et al., 2007 [61] 9 Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) Barostat balloon distension—pressure stimuli Neuroimaging (fMRI) 100-unit rating scale p < 0.05
Prossin et al., 2022 [55] 37 (12, 25) Healthy subjects Hypertonic saline injection Neuroimaging (PET, MRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Rief et al., 2012 [168] 144 (50, 904) Healthy participants Heat pain Behavioral Pain threshold change in °C p < 0.05
Ruscheweyh et al., 2014 [98] 60 (30 patients, 30 controls) Patients (cerebellum infarction) and healthy subjects Heat; pressure; pinprick pain Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Sawamoto et al., 2000 [83] 10 (10, 0) Healthy subjects Laser thermal stimulation Neuroimaging (fMRI) 0–100 scale p < 0.05
Schmid et al., 2015 [84] 44 (22, 22) Healthy subjects Rectal distension Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Schwartz et al., 2022 [161] 44 (18, 26) Patients (chronic low back pain) - Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Scott et al., 2007 [49] 48 (30 Study1; 16 Study2; 18 Male controls) Healthy subjects 5% hypertonic saline injection Neuroimaging
(Study1—PET, fMRI
Study2—fMRI)
VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Scott et al., 2008 [43] 20 (9, 11); 18 (18, 0) Healthy subjects Sustained muscle pain challenge Neuroimaging (PET, MRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.0001 for ROI
p = 0.05
Skyt et al., 2018 [47] 19 (10, 9) Patients (neuropathic pain) Pinprick-evoked pain; wind-up-like pain Behavioral VAS (0–10; 0–100) p < 0.05
Tétreault et al., 2016 [89] 98 (17 Study1; 39 Study2; 42 Study3) Patients (chronic knee osteoarthritis pain) - Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–10); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index p < 0.05
Tinnermann et al., 2017 [99] 57 (27, 22, 8) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Tu et al., 2021 [88] 81 (44, 37) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (fMRI); tDCS Gracely Sensory Scale (0–20) p < 0.05
Vachon-Presseau et al., 2018 [90] 129 (43 placebo group, 20 controls, 66 excluded) Patients (chronic back pain) Back pain intensity Neuroimaging (MRI, fMRI) VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Vachon-Presseau et al., 2022 [144] 181 (94 randomized to 3 arms, 87 excluded) Patients (chronic low back pain) Back pain intensity Neuroimaging (fMRI) Likert Scale (twice a day) p < 0.05
Van der Meulen et al., 2017 [72] 30 (13, 17) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (fMRI) VAS (0–100) p < 0.05
Vase et al., 2003 [82] 13 Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) Evoked rectal distension; heat pain Behavioral VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Vase et al., 2005 [110] 26 (0, 26) Patients (irritable bowel syndrome) Rectal distension Behavioral (Pharmacological) VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Vecchio et al., 2021 [77] 63 (31, 32) Healthy subjects Electrical stimuli Electrophysiological (EEG) 7 point Likert scale p = 0.05
Wager et al., 2004 [64] 47 Healthy subjects Shock pain; heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) 10 point scale p < 0.05
Wager et al., 2007 [65] 15 (15, 0) Healthy subjects Heat stimuli Neuroimaging (PET) VAS (0–10) p < 0.05
Wager et al., 2011 [63] 47 Healthy subjects Shock pain; heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI) 10 point scale p < 0.001
Wanigasekera et al., 2018 [96] 16 Patients (Post-traumatic neuropathic pain) - Neuroimaging (MRI) NRS (0–10) p = 0.05
Weimer et al., 2019 [108] 39 (25 monozygotic; 14 dizygotic twin pairs) Healthy subjects Heat pain Behavioral NRS (0–10) p < 0.05
Wrobel et al., 2014 [48] 50 (28, 32, 12) Healthy subjects Heat pain Neuroimaging (fMRI); Pharmacological VAS (0–100) p < 0.05

* If not differently specified.