Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2023 Jun 8;12(12):3932. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123932

Attitudes and Values of US Adults Not Yet Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccines in September 2022

Matthew Z Dudley 1,2,*, Holly B Schuh 1,3, Jana Shaw 4, Daniel A Salmon 1,2,5
Editor: Giovanni Gabutti
PMCID: PMC10299362  PMID: 37373627

Abstract

(1) Background: Periodic resurgences in COVID-19 due to more contagious variants highlight the need to increase coverage of booster doses. (2) Methods: Our September 2022 nationally representative survey of US adults measured COVID-19 vaccination status, intentions, attitudes, values, and confidence in information sources. (3) Findings: Although 85% of the weighted sample reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, only 63% reported being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines (e.g., received a booster dose). Only 12% of those not yet up-to-date indicated they were likely to get up-to-date as soon as possible, whereas 42% were unlikely to ever get up-to-date, and 46% were still uncertain. Most of those not up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines were under 45 years of age (58%), without a bachelor’s degree (76%), making under $75,000 annually (53%), and Republican or Independent (82%). Prevalent concerns about COVID-19 vaccines among those uncertain about getting up-to-date included: potential side effects that have not been figured out yet (88%), speed of development (77%), newness (75%), ingredients (69%), drug companies making money (67%), allergic reactions (65%), and experimenting on people (63%). (4) Conclusions: Nearly half of adults not yet up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines were uncertain about doing so, indicating an opportunity to support their decision-making.

Keywords: COVID-19, vaccine, vaccination, vaccine hesitancy

1. Introduction

As of March 2023, four vaccines against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been authorized by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA): two messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which were given Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA in December 2020 [1,2], the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) viral vector vaccine, which was given EUA in February 2021 [3], but is no longer available in the US, due to safety concerns [4], and the Novavax protein subunit vaccine, which was given EUA in July 2022 [5].

COVID-19 cases and deaths declined initially as vaccine supply caught up to demand in the spring of 2021 [6]. However, cases and deaths have periodically surged since then, largely due to the proliferation of the more contagious variants, such as Delta and Omicron [7]. Though vaccines remained effective in protecting against severe disease and death from new variants, their effectiveness was lower as compared to the original strain and waned over time [8,9,10]. Booster doses first received EUA in September 2021 to counteract waning immunity [11], and updated bivalent booster doses received EUA in August 2022 to increase protection against currently circulating strains [12].

The ongoing evolution of both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and our scientific knowledge has necessitated many updates to public health recommendations throughout the pandemic. This has led to public confusion and pandemic fatigue [13,14]. Vaccines have also unfortunately become a polarizing political issue during the pandemic [13]. This threatens public confidence in not only COVID-19 vaccines, but routine vaccines as well. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and influenced by a broad range of factors, such as the compulsory nature of vaccine mandates, coincidental temporal relationships to adverse health events, and lack of trust in government and the pharmaceutical industry [15]. Predictors of hesitancy to receive routine vaccines prior to the pandemic included socioeconomic factors, such as gender, education, income, region of residence, and race/ethnicity [16,17,18], as well as attitudinal constructs, such as confidence in vaccine efficacy and safety, perceived risk of vaccine-preventable diseases, and trust in sources of vaccine information [16]. Regular collection and consideration of representative public survey data is necessary to understand changes and trends in vaccine confidence and concerns.

We initially conducted a nationally representative survey in December 2020 (immediately prior to the first EUA) to measure COVID-19 vaccine intentions, attitudes, and values among US adults [19]. We found that half of US adults intended to likely receive the vaccine once available, while 40% were uncertain and 10% were unlikely to ever vaccinate. Intent to vaccinate (unadjusted) was lower among women, Black Americans, young adults, Republicans, those with lower income, those with larger households, those living in a non-metro area, and those without a bachelor’s degree. Trust in public health authorities was strongly associated with intending to vaccinate against COVID-19.

We conducted additional nationally representative surveys in July [20] and September [21] of 2021 to capture snapshots of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, values, and intentions at different stages in the pandemic. About three-quarters of US adults reported having received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination at this time (74% in July and 77% in September). Of those still unvaccinated as of September 2021, 6% intended to vaccinate, 40% were unlikely to ever vaccinate, and 55% remained uncertain.

Herein, we describe the findings from a fourth nationally representative survey. This survey was conducted in September 2022, which was a year since the last such survey, a year since booster doses were first authorized [11], and immediately following authorization of the updated bivalent boosters [12]. Our main focus was on those not “up-to-date” on their COVID-19 vaccines (e.g., those not yet receiving a booster dose).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey Platform

This nationally representative cross-sectional survey was conducted in English and Spanish between 1–12 September 2022, from a new set of respondents randomly identified from the Ipsos KnowledgePanel [22], a probability-based web panel sampling adults (18+ years of age) from all US households that was also used for previous surveys [19,20,21]. To improve the sample’s representativeness of the US population, households without internet access were given internet access and tablet computers. Hispanic Americans were supplementally recruited through random digit dialing in area codes with concentrated Hispanic populations. Enrollment quotas ensured that the sample’s sociodemographic distribution approximated the US, with 50% oversampling of Black and Hispanic respondents. Data from this survey were compared to data from a previous nationally representative survey, which was conducted in July 2021 using the same methodology as described above [20].

This work was considered public health surveillance and, thus, not human subject research by the Institutional Review Board at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

2.2. Survey Content

The primary outcomes of this survey were self-reported receipt of COVID-19 vaccines (including boosters) and intentions among those not yet up-to-date. Respondents began the survey by identifying themselves as either (1) up-to-date (i.e., fully vaccinated and boosted), (2) vaccinated, but not up-to-date (e.g., have not gotten booster yet), (3) not having received any COVID-19 vaccines, or (4) prefer not to say (which was treated as missing data for this survey item). Respondents who did not report already being up-to-date then elucidated their intentions to get up-to-date as either (1) definitely soon, (2) probably soon, (3) probably eventually but not right away, (4) only if required, (5) probably not, or (6) definitely not.

This survey measured attitudes about COVID-19 vaccines and disease specific to both adults and children, such as perceived disease susceptibility/severity and the importance of vaccines to control the pandemic. Among those not yet up-to-date and not definitely intending to get up-to-date soon, vaccine concerns and other reasons for not vaccinating were selected. Self-reported influenza vaccination coverage, confidence in sources of information about COVID-19, and cumulative prevalence of COVID-19 disease (e.g., ever having COVID-19) were captured. Trust in the CDC was measured as a construct via a 14-question scale [23]. Sociodemographic characteristics including gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, income, political affiliation, region, and metropolitan statistical area (MSA) were available for all Ipsos KnowledgePanel members. Many of the other items measured in this survey were also measured in the July 2021 survey [20] to allow for comparison over time. Choices in survey content were influenced by the Health Belief Model (e.g., inclusion of perceived susceptibility and severity to disease as well as perceived benefits of vaccinating) [24] and the Social Ecological Model (e.g., inclusion of social norms) [25].

2.3. Data Analyses

Our main analysis characterized those not yet up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccines, including their attitudes and values, trust in public health authorities, intentions to become up-to-date, and reasons for not yet doing so. We elucidated factors associated with being and intending to get up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccines. We also examined differences by race/ethnicity and looked for changes over time. Data were analyzed using Stata, version 16 [26].

A raking procedure was used to adjust design weights so that the sample was weighted to the population of adults at least 18 years old in the US. Black and Hispanic respondents were oversampled and down-weighted to reflect their proportion in the population. Further details on weighting are published elsewhere [19].

For the construct scale measuring trust in the CDC, a composite, linear score was generated (Supplemental Table S1). All answered items within the scale were coded (e.g., strongly disagree = 0, disagree = 1, agree = 2, strongly agree = 3, with negative items reversed) and summed to create the numerator, with the denominator being the total possible score (accounting for missing data). Thus, the scale ranged from 0 to 100 (0 being the least trust possible and 100 being the most trust possible) to facilitate comparisons across scales. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for this scale were estimated to be 0.93, indicating strong reliability. The score was then dichotomized at the middle (50), creating “high trust” and “low trust” groups.

Univariate analyses (unweighted and weighted) were conducted for sociodemographic characteristics and vaccination/disease status. Otherwise, only weighted analyses were performed. Sociodemographic variables were cross-tabulated against being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines and intention to become up-to-date (among those not yet up-to-date) and stratified by sociodemographic characteristics of interest, such as race/ethnicity. Intention to vaccinate was reclassified as (1) definitely soon or probably soon (Likely), (2) probably eventually, only if required, or probably not (Uncertain), and (3) definitely not (Unlikely). Likert scale response options (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) were dichotomized to agree vs. disagree to facilitate straightforward analyses and interpretation. Other scale response options (e.g., very worried, somewhat worried, not very worried, not at all worried) were similarly dichotomized to reflect affirmative vs. negative (e.g., worried vs. not worried). Weighted proportions for responses to items assessed among the entire sample in multiple surveys were compared to assess changes over time.

For all weighted proportions, standard errors were estimated by Taylor-linearized variance estimation. For all cross-tabulations and comparisons over time, p-values were estimated by Pearson chi-squared proportion tests (significance level of α = 0.05). Bivariate odds ratios were estimated by generalized logistic binomial regression and a logit link function with binary dependent variables for being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines and intention to become up-to-date (among those not yet up-to-date), and binary independent variables for affirmative responses to dichotomized survey items (or dummy indicator variables for categorical survey items). All reported odds ratios are unadjusted.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population and Survey Weighting

The survey was fielded among 5323 Ipsos KnowledgePanel members and returned 2787 completed responses, of which 2561 qualified for the study (based on eligibility criteria and survey quotas) (Supplemental Figure S1). Sociodemographic characteristics and vaccination status of the study population (unweighted and weighted) are presented in Table 1. Weighting had a limited impact other than by race/ethnicity (with oversampling of Black and Hispanic populations), since the Ipsos KnowledgePanel was designed to represent the US adult population. Weighted data are generalizable to US adults.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics and vaccination status of the September 2022 survey sample: unweighted and weighted.

Sociodemographic Characteristics Unweighted N (%) Weighted % a Sociodemographic Characteristics Unweighted N (%) Weighted % a
All 2561 (100) Household Annual Income
Gender <$50 k 847 (33.1) 29.9
Female 1274 (49.7) 51.4 $50–75 k 452 (17.6) 16.4
Male 1287 (50.3) 48.6 $75–100 k 346 (13.5) 13.1
Age (years) $100–150 k 413 (16.1) 17.8
18–29 308 (12) 19.9 $150 k+ 503 (19.6) 22.8
30–44 679 (26.5) 25.7 Political Affiliation
45–59 669 (26.1) 23.9 Republican 517 (20.2) 25.3
≥60 905 (35.3) 30.5 Democrat 998 (39.1) 32.8
Education Independent/other 1039 (40.7) 41.9
<High School 223 (8.7) 9.6 Metropolitan Statistical Area Status
High School 589 (23) 28.1 Non-metro 276 (10.8) 13.4
Some College 757 (29.6) 27.1 Metro 2285 (89.2) 86.6
Bachelor’s or Higher 576 (22.5) 19.6 Parent Status
Master’s or Higher 416 (16.2) 15.5 No children < 18 1794 (70.1) 71.4
Race/Ethnicity At least one child < 18 767 (29.9) 28.6
White, non-Hispanic 997 (38.9) 62.8 Influenza Vaccination b
Black, non-Hispanic 609 (23.8) 12.0 Not vaccinated 1144 (45.2) 46.1
Hispanic 838 (32.7) 16.9 Vaccinated 1386 (54.8) 53.9
Other, non-Hispanic 117 (4.6) 8.3 COVID-19 Vaccination
Region Not vaccinated 329 (13.3) 15.5
Northeast 415 (16.2) 17.3 Vaccinated (>1 dose) 2140 (86.7) 84.5
Midwest 455 (17.8) 20.7 COVID-19 Disease
South 1036 (40.5) 38.2 Never had 1432 (56.7) 55.9
West 655 (25.6) 23.8 Ever had 1093 (43.3) 44.1

a Weights were produced using iterative proportional fitting, so respondents were weighted to represent US adults; Black and Hispanic respondents were weighted to adjust for oversampling which was carried out to allow for sufficient power to perform analyses stratified by race/ethnicity. b Respondents reported influenza vaccination within the past 12 months; these data were collected just prior to the 2022–2023 influenza season, so reflect the 2021–2022 influenza season.

3.2. Vaccination Status

Although 85% of the weighted sample reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, less than two-thirds (63%) reported being up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines (Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency and odds of being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccinations by vaccine attitudes, trust in the CDC, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Survey Items Total
(%) a
COVID Vaccines, % b Odds Ratio
(95%CI) c
p-Value d
Not Up-to-Date Up-to-Date
All 100 37 63
Constructs e
Trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 68 44 84 6.56
(5.18–8.32)
<0.01
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Gender 0.78
Female 51 52 51 ref k
Male 49 48 49 1.03
(0.84–1.27)
Age (years) <0.01
18–29 20 28 15 ref k
30–44 26 30 23 1.40
(1.01–1.93)
45–59 24 22 26 2.16
(1.54–3.02)
60+ 31 20 37 3.35
(2.41–4.66)
Education (attained) <0.01
<High school 10 13 7 ref k
High school 28 34 23 1.23
(0.83–1.81)
Some college 27 29 26 1.60
(1.10–2.35)
Bachelor’s or higher 20 16 22 2.46
(1.65–3.68)
Master’s or higher 16 7 21 5.02
(3.20–7.88)
Race/Ethnicity 0.02
White, non-Hispanic 63 66 61 ref k
Black, non-Hispanic 12 12 12 1.06
(0.82–1.36)
Hispanic 17 17 17 1.11
(0.88–1.39)
Other, non-Hispanic 8 6 10 1.89
(1.14–3.13)
Region <0.01
Northeast 17 14 19 ref k
Midwest 21 23 19 0.60
(0.43–0.85)
South 38 45 34 0.55
(0.41–0.74)
West 24 18 27 1.07
(0.77–1.51)
Household income <0.01
<$50 k 30 35 25 ref k
$50–75 k 16 18 16 1.23
(0.91–1.67)
$75–100 k 13 14 13 1.39
(1.00–1.93)
$100–150 k 18 18 18 1.44
(1.05–1.97)
$150 k+ 23 16 28 2.47
(1.82–3.36)
Political affiliation <0.01
Republican 25 39 17 ref k
Democrat 33 18 43 5.27
(3.97–6.99)
Independent/other 42 43 40 2.07
(1.59–2.69)
Metropolitan Statistical Area status (metro vs. non-metro) 87 81 90 2.09
(1.54–2.85)
<0.01
Parent status (at least one child < 18 vs. no children < 18) 29 36 24 0.57
(0.46–0.72)
<0.01
Affirmative Responses To Survey Items f
Vaccination and Disease Status
Vaccinated against flu within the past year 54 26 72 6.99
(5.53–8.83)
<0.01
Ever knowingly had COVID disease 44 53 39 0.57
(0.47–0.71)
<0.01
Confidence in sources for information about COVID-19
My doctor 86 73 96 9.05
(6.23–13.16)
<0.01
My local or state health department 74 50 90 8.99
(6.91–11.69)
<0.01
Scientists and doctors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 70 43 87 9.05
(7.04–11.64)
<0.01
The Surgeon General 68 42 86 8.29
(6.48–10.60)
<0.01
Scientists and doctors from universities 73 49 89 8.65
(6.65–11.26)
<0.01
Dr. Anthony Fauci from the National Institutes of Health 62 33 80 8.33
(6.58–10.55)
<0.01
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director 63 35 81 8.02
(6.33–10.15)
<0.01
Dr. David Satcher, Morehouse School of Medicine, Former CDC Director and Surgeon General 62 35 80 7.39
(5.85–9.34)
<0.01
My religious leader 31 26 33 1.45
(1.15–1.82)
<0.01
Other non-medical people in my community that I trust (specify) 31 25 34 1.59
(1.23–2.06)
<0.01
What I see on the news 37 16 50 5.17
(4.04–6.61)
<0.01
What I see on social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 13 9 15 1.78
(1.28–2.46)
<0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (For Adults)
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my family members in the next six months 30 19 37 2.56
(2.02–3.25)
<0.01
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my friends, neighbors, or co-workers in the next six months 27 17 33 2.37
(1.85–3.03)
<0.01
If I get COVID-19, I think it will be severe 14 13 14 1.18
(0.86–1.61)
0.30
COVID-19 vaccines are important to stopping the spread of infection in the US 72 44 91 12.73
(9.67–16.75)
<0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are important to helping the US get back to a normal life 71 40 91 15.60
(11.84–20.55)
<0.01
Most or all of my family members have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 65 40 82 6.63
(5.25–8.36)
<0.01
Most or all of my friends have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 58 33 75 6.14
(4.90–7.69)
<0.01
I feel knowledgeable about the COVID-19 vaccine 76 31 89 1.98
(1.56–2.52)
<0.01
I would like more information on COVID-19 vaccines 30 24 81 1.62
(1.29–2.05)
<0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (for Children)
COVID-19 can be a serious disease for some children 83 71 92 4.72
(3.54–6.28)
<0.01
I am concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccine in children 61 78 50 0.27
(0.21–0.34)
<0.01
Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is important to end the pandemic and get back to normal 65 33 84 11.01
(8.61–14.09)
<0.01
It is better for children to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than by getting a shot 37 65 19 0.13
(0.10–0.17)
<0.01
COVID-19 in children is no worse than a cold or the flu 42 64 28 0.22
(0.18–0.28)
<0.01
I would support a requirement for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to attend school 56 27 74 7.86
(6.21–9.95)
<0.01
My child(ren)’s doctor recommended that my child(ren) be vaccinated against COVID-19 once authorized by the FDA g 67 46 88 8.91
(5.61–14.14)
<0.01
If not: I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine if my child(ren)’s doctor recommended it g 27 20 60 6.10
(2.58–14.38)
<0.01
I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine that was fully approved for children by the FDA (instead of just authorized for emergency use) g 66 51 80 3.94
(2.59–5.99)
<0.01
Agreement With General Vaccine Likert Scale Items
I am confident in the safety of vaccines 79 60 93 8.58
(6.41–11.5)
<0.01
I do not trust a vaccine unless it has already been safely given to millions of other people 46 63 37 0.34
(0.27–0.42)
<0.01
I am concerned about some of the ingredients in vaccines 47 68 34 0.24
(0.20–0.31)
<0.01
Vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are a good fit for me 72 48 88 8.27
(6.39–10.71)
<0.01
I am concerned that the government and drug companies experiment on people like me 41 64 27 0.21
(0.17–0.26)
<0.01
The benefits of vaccines are much bigger than their risks 78 58 93 9.73
(7.30–12.96)
<0.01

Red text indicates survey items assessing negative vaccine attitudes. a Column percentages (of total sample), weighted for national representativeness; b column percentages (of up-to-date/not up-to-date) (except for first row “All” which is a row percentage), weighted for national representativeness; c odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of being up-to-date vs. not up-to-date for affirmative survey response vs. not; d using the Pearson chi-square test (significance level of alpha = 5%); for non-dichotomous categorical variables, p-values for differences between all categories included in top row with variable name; e for the construct scale measuring trust in the CDC, a composite, linear score was generated. All answered items within the scale were coded (e.g., strongly disagree = 0, disagree = 1, agree = 2, strongly agree = 3; with negative items reversed) and summed to create the numerator, with the denominator being the total possible score (accounting for missing data). Thus, the scale ranged from 0 to 100 (0 being the least trust possible and 100 being most trust possible). The score was then dichotomized at the middle (50), creating “high trust” and “low trust” groups; f Likert scale response options (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) were dichotomized to agree/disagree, results for agreement shown; other scale response options were dichotomized to reflect affirmative/negative, results for affirmative shown; g asked only to respondents with children < 18; k reference value for logistic regression of categorical variables.

3.2.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated with Vaccination Status

Sociodemographic factors negatively associated with being up-to-date included younger age, less education, lower income, being a parent, living in the southern or midwestern regions of the US, living in a non-metro area, and identifying as Republican.

3.2.2. Vaccine Attitudes Associated with Vaccination Status

Positive vaccine attitudes were positively associated with being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines, and negative vaccine attitudes were negatively associated. For example, the strongest association identified was among those who believed COVID-19 vaccines important in getting back to a normal life, who had nearly 16 times higher odds of being up-to-date compared to those who did not (odds ratio: 15.60; 95%CI: 11.84–20.55). Vaccinating against influenza during the past year was positively associated with being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines (OR: 6.99; 95%CI: 5.53–8.83), while having ever had the COVID-19 disease was negatively associated (OR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.47–0.71). Perceived COVID-19 disease severity was not associated with being up-to-date.

3.2.3. Trust in the CDC Associated with Vaccination Status

About two-thirds (68%) of the weighted sample reported high trust in the CDC according to our construct scale. Those with high trust in the CDC had nearly seven times higher odds of being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines compared to those with low trust (OR: 6.56; 95%CI: 5.18–8.32).

3.2.4. Confidence in COVID-19 Information Sources Associated with Vaccination Status

Most (86%) of the weighted sample reported confidence in their doctor as a source of COVID-19 information. Nearly three-quarters reported confidence in their health department (74%), scientists/doctors from universities (73%), and the CDC (70%). Individual medical professionals also had the confidence of the majority, such as the Surgeon General (68%), CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky (63%), NIAID, NIH Director Dr. Anthony Fauci (62%), and Former CDC Director and Surgeon General Dr. David Satcher (62%). About one-third reported confidence in the news (37%), their religious leader (31%), and trusted non-medical community members (31%). Only 13% reported confidence in COVID-19 information from social media.

Confidence in COVID-19 information from all sources we inquired about were positively associated with being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines, though associations were strongest with health professionals listed, such as one’s doctor (OR: 9.05; 95%CI: 6.23–13.16) and the CDC (OR: 9.05; 95%CI: 7.04–11.64), and weakest with those listed from other fields, such as religious leaders (OR: 1.45; 95%CI: 1.15–1.82) and trusted non-medical community members (OR: 1.59; 95%CI: 1.23–2.06).

3.3. Characterizing Those Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccines

3.3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics among Those Not Up-to-Date

Most of those not up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines were under 45 years of age (58%), without a bachelor’s degree (76%), making under $75,000 annually (53%), and Republican or Independent (82%). About one-quarter (26%) of those not up-to-date had received a flu vaccine within the past year.

3.3.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated with Vaccine Intentions among Those Not Up-to-Date

Although only 12% of those not yet up-to-date indicated they were likely to get up-to-date as soon as possible and 42% were unlikely to ever get up-to-date, almost half (46%) were still uncertain (Table 3). Democrats not yet up-to-date had higher odds of being likely (OR: 25.94; 95%CI: 10.48–64.20) or uncertain (OR: 6.59; 95%CI: 3.84–11.31) vs. unlikely to get up-to-date than Republicans (Supplemental Table S2). Non-white Americans not yet up-to-date had higher odds of being likely or uncertain (vs. unlikely) to get up-to-date than white Americans; for example, both Black and Hispanic Americans had about five times higher odds of being likely (vs. unlikely) to get up-to-date than white Americans.

Table 3.

Frequency and odds of intentions to get up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccinations by vaccine attitudes, trust in the CDC, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Survey Items Total
Not Up-to-Date (%) a
COVID Vaccine Intentions, % b p-Value c
Likely Uncertain Unlikely
All 100 12 46 42
Constructs e
Trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 44 84 56 15 <0.01
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Gender 0.97
Female 52 52 51 52
Male 48 48 49 48
Age (years) 0.46
18–29 28 33 28 24
30–44 30 32 32 29
45–59 22 17 21 23
60+ 20 17 19 24
Education (attained) 0.17
<High school 13 22 14 10
High school 34 24 34 39
Some college 29 28 29 29
Bachelor’s or higher 16 19 16 14
Master’s or higher 7 7 7 8
Race/Ethnicity <0.01
White, non-Hispanic 66 37 63 76
Black, non-Hispanic 12 20 13 9
Hispanic 17 31 18 12
Other, non-Hispanic 6 11 7 3
Region 0.14
Northeast 14 13 12 16
Midwest 23 18 25 20
South 45 50 40 48
West 18 19 22 15
Household income 0.68
<$50 k 35 43 38 35
$50–75 k 18 18 17 17
$75–100 k 14 9 15 11
$100–150 k 18 16 15 20
$150 k+ 16 14 15 16
Political affiliation <0.01
Republican 39 15 31 52
Democrat 18 42 22 5
Independent/other 43 43 47 43
Metropolitan Statistical Area status (metro vs. non-metro) 81 86 84 78 0.19
Parent status (at least one child < 18 vs. no children < 18) 36 48 34 33 0.06
Affirmative Responses To Survey Items f
Vaccination and Disease Status
Vaccinated against flu within the past year 26 45 27 20 <0.01
Ever knowingly had COVID disease 53 49 49 55 0.31
Reasons to not get a COVID-19 vaccine h
I do not think I am at risk of getting COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 23 20 16 30
No 52 62 49 54
Do not know 25 18 35 16
I do not think I would get very sick if I got COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 45 19 40 52
No 33 53 33 30
Do not know 21 28 27 18
I do not believe COVID-19 is any worse than the seasonal flu <0.01
Yes 47 15 36 64
No 36 70 41 23
Do not know
17 15 22 14
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 54 19 37 78
No 28 56 37 12
Do not know 18 25 26 10
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from new variants of COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 61 26 48 79
No 21 49 26 11
Do not know 18 25 26 10
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from “Long COVID” <0.01
Yes 53 22 37 74
No 21 51 26 11
Do not know 26 26 37 15
It is better to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than by getting a shot <0.01
Yes 50 14 33 76
No 26 69 35 5
Do not know 24 17 32 19
I would rather take other precautions (such masking and social distancing) than get a shot <0.01
Yes 41 20 42 42
No 51 66 45 53
Do not know 9 14 13 4
I am worried about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines <0.01
Yes 66 23 56 83
No 25 67 32 10
Do not know 9 10 13 7
I do not like needles 0.03
Yes 23 35 24 21
No 74 55 72 77
Do not know 4 10 4 3
I do not trust how the vaccine was developed <0.01
Yes 57 17 41 81
No 29 63 40 10
Do not know 14 20 19 10
I do not trust the pharmaceutical companies that have developed the vaccine <0.01
Yes 54 19 38 79
No 28 49 39 12
Do not know 18 32 24 10
I do not believe that the government is acting in my or my family’s best interest <0.01
Yes 60 22 45 83
No 23 52 32 7
Do not know 17 26 23 10
I do not have access to where vaccines are being given 0.04
Yes 5 10 6 4
No 89 77 85 91
Do not know 7 12 9 4
I do not know how to register to get a vaccine <0.01
Yes 3 13 3 3
No 93 81 89 94
Do not know 4 6 7 3
I know how to register to get a vaccine but it is too difficult 0.03
Yes 4 11 5 2
No 89 78 86 93
Do not know 6 11 9 4
My friends and/or family do not want to get the vaccine <0.01
Yes 22 15 15 30
No 62 74 68 53
Do not know 16 12 17 17
I have seen posts on social media that make me wary of the vaccine <0.01
Yes 23 12 18 31
No 69 72 72 63
Do not know 8 16 10 6
I want to wait to see what happens to others <0.01
Yes 39 14 36 44
No 51 70 49 51
Do not know 10 16 15 5
I need more time to learn and think more about it <0.01
Yes 34 18 41 28
No 59 64 49 68
Do not know 7 18 10 3
Other 0.02
Yes 25 15 19 32
No 54 46 59 47
Do not know 22 39 22 20
Concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines i
How fast COVID-19 vaccines were developed and made available to the public 84 58 77 89 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are new 79 37 75 85 <0.01
A lot of people who get the vaccine feel tired, achy, and get headaches and fever the next day 58 64 52 65 0.03
Some people have bad allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines 70 57 65 74 0.08
I am not sure the ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines are safe 78 59 69 87 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are made from mRNA 69 42 59 78 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines might change my DNA 44 48 37 53 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines might affect my fertility or ability to have children 41 52 33 46 0.01
There may be side effects to the COVID-19 vaccine that have not been figured out yet 91 67 88 92 <0.01
There were not enough people of my race/ethnicity who were a part of the vaccine studies 35 51 37 37 0.46
They are experimenting on people with the COVID-19 vaccine 73 59 63 84 <0.01
The drug companies are making a lot of money off of COVID-19 vaccines 75 63 67 83 <0.01
Some COVID-19 vaccines are made from aborted fetuses 48 57 38 58 <0.01
Confidence in sources for information about COVID-19
My doctor 73 94 80 54 <0.01
My local or state health department 50 87 60 25 <0.01
Scientists and doctors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 43 87 53 17 <0.01
The Surgeon General 42 83 52 15 <0.01
Scientists and doctors from universities 49 88 57 26 <0.01
Dr. Anthony Fauci from the National Institutes of Health 33 78 41 10 <0.01
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director 35 77 42 13 <0.01
Dr. David Satcher, Morehouse School of Medicine, Former CDC Director and Surgeon General 35 75 42 14 <0.01
My religious leader 26 40 25 24 0.02
Other non-medical people in my community that I trust (specify) 25 27 24 28 0.70
What I see on the news 16 44 20 5 <0.01
What I see on social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 9 20 9 6 <0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (For Adults)
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my family members in the next six months 19 54 21 7 <0.01
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my friends, neighbors, or co-workers in the next six months 17 53 18 7 <0.01
If I get COVID-19, I think it will be severe 13 40 12 7 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are important to stopping the spread of infection in the US 44 97 59 10 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are important to helping the US get back to a normal life 40 94 53 9 <0.01
Most or all of my family members have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 40 69 47 21 <0.01
Most or all of my friends have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 33 54 39 16 <0.01
If my main doctor were to recommend that I take the COVID-19 vaccine, I would be likely to take it 28 96 46 6 <0.01
If a close family member were to recommend that I take the COVID-19 vaccine, I would be likely to take it 24 75 40 3 <0.01
If my close friends were to recommend that I take the COVID-19 vaccine, I would be likely to take it 20 73 33 3 <0.01
I feel knowledgeable about the COVID-19 vaccine 68 64 62 76 <0.01
I would like to get more information on COVID-19 vaccines 24 53 31 10 <0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (for Children)
COVID-19 can be a serious disease for some children 71 94 81 51 <0.01
I am concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccine in children 78 69 78 81 0.08
Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is important to end the pandemic and get back to normal 33 88 43 8 <0.01
It is better for children to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than by getting a shot 65 28 56 84 <0.01
COVID-19 in children is no worse than a cold or the flu 64 33 58 79 <0.01
I would support a requirement for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to attend school 27 83 31 5 <0.01
My child(ren)’s doctor recommended that my child(ren) be vaccinated against COVID-19 once authorized by the FDA g 46 80 50 22 <0.01
If not: I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine if my child(ren)’s doctor recommended it g 20 81 28 6 <0.01
I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine that was fully approved for children by the FDA (instead of just authorized for emergency use) g 51 93 62 16 <0.01
Agreement With General Vaccine Likert Scale Items
I am confident in the safety of vaccines 60 92 66 40 <0.01
I do not trust a vaccine unless it has already been safely given to millions of other people 63 50 63 64 0.08
I am concerned about some of the ingredients in vaccines 68 56 64 76 <0.01
Vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are a good fit for me 48 92 58 22 <0.01
I am concerned that the government and drug companies experiment on people like me 64 51 57 76 <0.01
The benefits of vaccines are much bigger than their risks 58 87 64 36 <0.01

Red text indicates survey items assessing negative vaccine attitudes. a Column percentages (of respondents not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines), weighted for national representativeness; b column percentages (of corresponding intention categories) (except for first row “All” which is a row percentage), weighted for national representativeness; c using the Pearson chi-square test (significance level of alpha = 5%); for non-dichotomous categorical variables, p-values for differences between all categories included in top row with variable name; e construct scales combine scores for each relevant survey item (reversing negative items) and divide by maximum (e.g., 100 being complete trust and 0 being complete distrust); after dichotomizing at middle (50), binary variable represents high vs. low score (e.g., 1 being high trust and 0 being low trust); f Likert scale response options (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) were dichotomized to agree/disagree, results for agreement shown; other scale response options were dichotomized to reflect affirmative/negative, results for affirmative shown; g asked only to respondents with children < 18; h asked only to respondents not yet up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines and not definitely planning to soon become up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines; i asked only to respondents worried or uncertain about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

3.3.3. Vaccine Attitudes Associated with Vaccine Intentions among Those Not Up-to-Date

Many of the vaccine attitudes associated with being up-to-date in Table 2 were also strongly associated with being likely or uncertain (vs. unlikely) to get up-to-date (Supplemental Table S2). In addition, those who expected the COVID-19 disease to be severe if they got it had nine times higher odds of being likely (vs. unlikely) to get up-to-date (OR: 9.19; 95%CI: 4.53–18.64).

3.3.4. Information Sources Associated with Vaccine Intentions among Those Not Up-to-Date

Confidence in COVID-19 information from all sources we inquired about other than trusted non-medical community members were positively associated with being likely to get up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines. Associations were strongest with the health professionals listed, such as Dr. Fauci (OR: 33.86; 95%CI: 15.91–72.07) and the CDC (OR: 32.64; 95%CI: 16.06–66.33).

3.3.5. Reasons to Vaccinate among Those Uncertain about Getting Up-to-Date

More than half of those uncertain about getting up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines reported believing that vaccines are important in stopping the spread of infection (59%) and helping the US get back to normal (53%) (Table 3). Fewer than half of the uncertain reported most or all of their family members (47%) and friends (39%) had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19, and that if their main doctor (46%) or a close family member (40%) or close friend (33%) recommended it, they would likely vaccinate. About one-fifth of the uncertain worried about spreading COVID-19 to their family (21%) or their friends, neighbors, and coworkers (28%). Only 12% of the uncertain thought COVID-19 would be severe if they got it. Although 62% of the uncertain already felt knowledgeable about COVID-19 vaccines, 31% wanted more information about them.

3.3.6. Specific Vaccine Concerns among Those Uncertain about Getting Up-to-Date

The most common concerns about COVID-19 vaccines among those uncertain about getting up-to-date included their potential side effects that have not been figured out yet (88%), the speed of their development (77%), their newness (75%), the safety of their ingredients (69%), drug companies making a lot of money off of them (67%), allergic reactions to them (65%), and experimenting on people with them (63%). Other less common but still prevalent concerns among the uncertain included immediate side effects, such as aches/fatigue/fever (52%), some vaccines being made from aborted fetuses (38%), not enough diversity (“people of my race/ethnicity”) in vaccine studies (37%), potential changes to DNA (37%), and potential effects on fertility (33%).

3.3.7. Other Reasons Not to Vaccinate among Those Uncertain about Getting Up-to-Date

About half of those uncertain about getting up-to-date reported worrying about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines (56%), thinking COVID-19 vaccines are not likely to protect against new variants (48%), and believing that the government is not acting in their best interest (45%). More than a third of the uncertain reported preferring to take other precautions (such as masking and social distancing) rather than getting a shot (42%), needing more time to learn and think more about it (41%), thinking they would not get very sick if they got COVID-19 (40%), not trusting pharmaceutical companies (38%), thinking vaccines unlikely to protect against either COVID-19 or “Long COVID” (37%), believing COVID-19 is no worse than the seasonal flu (36%), wanting to wait to see what happens to others who vaccinate (36%), and believing it better to develop immunity by getting sick rather than by getting a shot (33%). Fewer than one-fifth of the uncertain reported social media posts making them wary of vaccinating (18%), not thinking they were at risk of getting COVID-19 (16%), and their friends/family not wanting to vaccinate (15%). Only 6% reported not having access to vaccines, only 5% reported it too difficult to register for vaccination, and only 3% reported not knowing how to register.

3.3.8. Information Sources among Those Uncertain about Getting Up-to-Date

Four-fifths (80%) of those uncertain about getting up-to-date were confident in their doctor as a source of COVID-19 information. Other health professionals listed had the confidence of about half of the uncertain, such as health departments (60%), university scientists and doctors (57%), the CDC (53%), the Surgeon General (52%), and Dr. Fauci (41%). About one-quarter of the uncertain were confident in those listed from other fields, such as religious leaders (25%) and trusted non-medical community members (24%). One-fifth (20%) of the uncertain trusted the news for COVID-19 information, and only 9% trusted social media.

3.4. Differences by Race and Ethnicity

3.4.1. Vaccination Status

About the same proportion (62–64%) of white, Black, and Hispanic Americans reported being up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines (Table 4). Among those not yet up-to-date, about two-thirds of Black (68%) and Hispanic (70%) Americans remained open to getting up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines (either likely to vaccinate or uncertain), compared to about half (51%) of white Americans (p < 0.01). In contrast, more white Americans (57%) were vaccinated against flu than Black and Hispanic Americans (46%) (p < 0.01).

Table 4.

Race/ethnicity by vaccine attitudes, trust in the CDC, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Survey Items Total (%) a Race/Ethnicity (%) b p-Value c
White Black Hispanic Other
All 100 63 12 17 8
Constructs d
Trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 68 63 74 74 81 <0.01
Affirmative Responses To Survey Items e
Vaccination and Disease Status
Vaccinated against flu within the past year 54 57 46 46 60 <0.01
Ever knowingly had COVID disease 44 44 34 48 50 0.01
Vaccinated against COVID (at least one dose) 85 83 84 87 95 <0.01
Up-to-date on COVID vaccines 63 62 63 64 75 0.02
If not up-to-date: intentions to get up-to-date <0.01
Likely to soon get up-to-date 12 7 20 22 24
Uncertain about getting up-to-date 46 44 49 48 54
Unlikely to ever get up-to-date 42 49 32 30 22
Reasons to not get a COVID-19 vaccine h
I do not think I am at risk of getting COVID-19 0.20
Yes 23 21 22 26 23
No 52 56 48 38 52
Do not know 25 23 30 36 25
I do not think I would get very sick if I got COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 45 48 24 36 44
No 33 31 38 33 48
Do not know 21 21 38 31 8
I do not believe COVID-19 is any worse than the seasonal flu <0.01
Yes 47 55 23 32 32
No 36 31 44 40 67
Do not know 17 15 33 28 1
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from COVID-19 0.01
Yes 54 59 40 43 43
No 28 24 32 31 50
Do not know 18 17 27 26 8
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from new variants of COVID-19 <0.01
Yes 61 67 46 48 31
No 21 16 29 24 53
Do not know 18 16 25 28 16
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from “Long COVID” <0.01
Yes 53 59 43 39 29
No 21 16 27 27 52
Do not know 26 25 30 35 19
It is better to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than by getting a shot <0.01
Yes 50 55 30 45 42
No 26 22 29 25 44
Do not know 24 23 41 30 13
I would rather take other precautions (such as masking and social distancing) than get a shot <0.01
Yes 41 35 61 51 31 <0.01
No 51 57 28 35 63
Do not know 9 8 11 14 6
I am worried about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines 0.19
Yes 66 68 63 56 70
No 25 23 25 29 30
Do not know 9 10 12 15 0
I do not like needles 0.01
Yes 23 22 30 23 24
No 74 75 61 69 75
Do not know 4 2 8 9 1
I do not trust how the vaccine was developed 0.01
Yes 57 62 49 45 48
No 29 26 28 32 47
Do not know 14 13 23 23 6
I do not trust the pharmaceutical companies that have developed the vaccine <0.01
Yes 54 60 43 43 43
No 28 24 30 31 50
Do not know 18 16 27 26 7
I do not believe that the government is acting in my or my family’s best interest <0.01
Yes 60 66 49 45 51
No 23 19 25 28 38
Do not know 17 15 27 27 11
I do not have access to where vaccines are being given <0.01
Yes 5 4 12 9 3
No 89 91 74 77 97
Do not know 7 6 14 14 0
I do not know how to register to get a vaccine 0.01
Yes 3 2 7 6 3
No 93 93 82 85 95
Do not know 4 4 11 9 2
I know how to register to get a vaccine but it is too difficult <0.01
Yes 4 2 8 9 12
No 89 91 81 81 85
Do not know 6 7 11 10 2
My friends and/or family do not want to get the vaccine <0.01
Yes 22 23 21 16 21
No 62 62 52 61 78
Do not know 16 15 26 23 1
I have seen posts on social media that make me wary of the vaccine 0.16
Yes 23 22 24 27 19
No 69 69 63 61 81
Do not know 8 9 13 12 0
I want to wait to see what happens to others 0.10
Yes 39 38 33 39 41
No 51 53 47 45 50
Do not know 10 9 20 15 8
I need more time to learn and think more about it 0.03
Yes 34 32 40 38 37
No 59 62 51 48 62
Do not know 7 6 9 14 1
Other 0.03
Yes 25 29 17 15 10
No 54 49 55 57 77
Do not know 22 21 28 28 13
Concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines i
How fast COVID-19 vaccines were developed and made available to the public 84 87 76 68 90 0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are new 79 83 68 65 81 <0.01
A lot of people who get the vaccine feel tired, achy, and get headaches and fever the next day 58 59 64 57 56 0.79
Some people have bad allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines 70 70 74 66 73 0.76
I am not sure the ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines are safe 78 80 77 70 75 0.34
COVID-19 vaccines are made from mRNA 69 72 64 56 69 0.07
COVID-19 vaccines might change my DNA 44 44 54 51 39 0.31
COVID-19 vaccines might affect my fertility or ability to have children 41 41 41 43 31 0.69
There may be side effects to the COVID-19 vaccine that have not been figured out yet 91 92 83 77 100 <0.01
There were not enough people of my race/ethnicity who were a part of the vaccine studies 35 31 55 43 60 <0.01
They are experimenting on people with the COVID-19 vaccine 73 75 72 68 79 0.65
The drug companies are making a lot of money off of COVID-19 vaccines 75 80 62 65 76 <0.01
Some COVID-19 vaccines are made from aborted fetuses 48 52 42 48 44 0.44
Confidence in sources for information about COVID-19
My doctor 86 86 82 88 89 0.25
My local or state health department 74 71 76 80 82 <0.01
Scientists and doctors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 70 65 75 79 81 <0.01
The Surgeon General 68 63 72 76 82 <0.01
Scientists and doctors from universities 73 69 73 81 85 <0.01
Dr. Anthony Fauci from the National Institutes of Health 62 55 74 73 77 <0.01
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director 63 58 67 72 73 <0.01
Dr. David Satcher, Morehouse School of Medicine, Former CDC Director and Surgeon General 62 57 67 71 76 <0.01
My religious leader 31 25 45 41 29 <0.01
Other non-medical people in my community that I trust (specify) 31 31 31 34 24 0.29
What I see on the news 37 33 43 49 42 <0.01
What I see on social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 13 8 20 24 15 <0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (For Adults)
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my family members in the next six months 30 24 36 47 38 <0.01
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my friends, neighbors, or co-workers in the next six months 27 21 31 43 36 <0.01
If I get COVID-19, I think it will be severe 14 12 16 18 16 0.05
COVID-19 vaccines are important to stopping the spread of infection in the US 72 68 77 80 84 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are important to helping the US get back to a normal life 71 66 75 79 89 <0.01
Most or all of my family members have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 65 64 59 69 76 <0.01
Most or all of my friends have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 58 57 50 58 78 <0.01
I feel knowledgeable about the COVID-19 vaccine 76 80 75 63 79 <0.01
I would like to get more information on COVID-19 vaccines 30 25 40 41 37 <0.01
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (for Children)
COVID-19 can be a serious disease for some children 83 82 91 81 86 0.01
I am concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccine in children 61 59 70 67 51 <0.01
Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is important to end the pandemic and get back to normal 65 59 73 71 80 <0.01
It is better for children to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than by getting a shot 37 38 33 39 29 0.11
COVID-19 in children is no worse than a cold or the flu 42 45 32 40 41 0.01
I would support a requirement for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to attend school 56 50 65 64 72 <0.01
My child(ren)’s doctor recommended that my child(ren) be vaccinated against COVID-19 once authorized by the FDA f 67 60 69 69 93 <0.01
If not: I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine if my child(ren)’s doctor recommended it f 27 28 22 23 35 0.83
I would feel more comfortable giving my child(ren) a COVID-19 vaccine that was fully approved for children by the FDA (instead of just authorized for emergency use) f 66 59 68 76 72 0.01
Agreement With General Vaccine Likert Scale Items
I am confident in the safety of vaccines 79 78 77 81 88 0.05
I do not trust a vaccine unless it has already been safely given to millions of other people 46 43 56 54 46 <0.01
I am concerned about some of the ingredients in vaccines 47 45 58 52 42 <0.01
Vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are a good fit for me 72 70 74 76 84 <0.01
I am concerned that the government and drug companies experiment on people like me 41 36 56 52 41 <0.01
The benefits of vaccines are much bigger than their risks 78 77 76 80 90 0.01

Red text indicates survey items assessing negative vaccine attitudes. a Column percentages (of total sample), weighted for national representativeness; b column percentages (of race/ethnicity) (except for first row “All” which is a row percentage), weighted for national representativeness; all race/ethnicity categories are non-Hispanic except for Hispanic (i.e., participants of Hispanic ethnicity were considered Hispanic regardless of their race); c using the Pearson chi-square test (significance level of alpha = 5%); for non-dichotomous categorical variables, p-values for differences between all categories included in top row with variable name; d construct scales combine scores for each relevant survey item (reversing negative items) and divide by maximum (e.g., 100 being complete trust and 0 being complete distrust); after dichotomizing at middle (50), binary variable represents high vs. low score (e.g., 1 being high trust and 0 being low trust); e Likert scale response options (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) were dichotomized to agree/disagree, results for agreement shown; other scale response options were dichotomized to reflect affirmative/negative, results for affirmative shown; f asked only to respondents with children; h asked only to respondents not yet up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines and not definitely planning to soon become up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines; i asked only to respondents worried or uncertain about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

3.4.2. Reasons to Vaccinate

Black and especially Hispanic Americans also tended to report reasons to vaccinate more frequently than white Americans. More than three-quarters of Black (77% and 75%) and Hispanic (80% and 79%) Americans reported believing vaccines important in stopping the spread of infection and helping the US get back to normal, respectively, compared to about two-thirds of white Americans (68% and 66%) (p < 0.01). Nearly half of Hispanic Americans worried about spreading COVID-19 to their family (47%) or their friends, neighbors, and coworkers (43%), compared to about one-third of Black Americans (36% and 31%, respectively) and one-quarter of white Americans (24% and 21%, respectively) (p < 0.01). However, Black Americans were the least likely to report that most or all of their family members (59%) and friends (50%) had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19, compared to white (64% and 57%, respectively) and Hispanic (69% and 58%, respectively) Americans (p < 0.01). Four-fifths (80%) of white Americans already felt knowledgeable about COVID-19 vaccines, compared to three-quarters (75%) of Black and 63% of Hispanic Americans (p < 0.01). Only one-quarter (25%) of white Americans wanted more information about COVID-19 vaccines, compared to 40% of Black and 41% of Hispanic Americans (p < 0.01).

3.4.3. Specific Vaccine Concerns and Other Reasons Not to Vaccinate

Among those not yet up-to-date, white Americans reported many of the specific concerns and other reasons not to vaccinate more frequently than Black and Hispanic Americans. White Americans were more likely to be concerned about the potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccines that have not been figured out yet (92%), the speed of their development (87%), their newness (83%), and drug companies making a lot of money off of them (80%), compared to Black Americans (83%, 76%, 68%, and 62%, respectively) and Hispanic Americans (77%, 68%, 65%, and 65%, respectively) (p < 0.01). White Americans were more likely to report not thinking they would get very sick if they got COVID-19 (48%), not believing COVID-19 to be any worse than the flu (55%), not thinking vaccines likely to protect them from COVID-19 (59%), new variants of COVID-19 (67%), or “Long COVID” (59%), and believing it better to develop immunity to COVID-19 by getting sick rather than getting a shot (55%), compared to Hispanic Americans (36%, 32%, 43%, 48%, and 39%, respectively) and Black Americans (24%, 23%, 40%, 46%, 43%, and 30%, respectively) (p < 0.01). White Americans were also more likely to report not trusting the pharmaceutical companies that have developed the vaccine (60%) and not believing that the government acts in their best interest (66%), compared to Hispanic Americans (43% and 45%, respectively) and Black Americans (43% and 49%, respectively) (p < 0.01).

However, white Americans were the least likely to report concerns regarding not enough diversity (“people of my race/ethnicity”) in vaccine studies (31%), followed by Hispanic (43%) and then Black (55%) Americans (p < 0.01). White Americans were also less likely to prefer taking other precautions (such as masking and social distancing) to getting a shot (35%), compared to Hispanic (51%) and Black (61%) Americans (p < 0.01). White Americans were the least likely to report not having access to vaccines (4%), not knowing how to register for vaccination (2%), and it being too difficult to register (2%), compared to Hispanic Americans (9%, 6%, and 9%, respectively) and Black Americans (12%, 7%, and 8%, respectively) (p < 0.01).

3.4.4. Information Sources

No difference was found by race/ethnicity in one’s confidence in their doctor or in trusted non-medical community members as sources of COVID-19 information. However, all other information sources listed had lower confidence among white Americans as compared to Black and Hispanic Americans. This includes both health professionals, such as the CDC (65% vs. 75% vs. 79%, respectively) and Dr. Fauci (55% vs. 74% vs. 73%, respectively), as well as other sources, such as religious leaders (25% vs. 45% vs. 41%, respectively) and social media (8% vs. 20% vs. 24%, respectively) (p < 0.01).

3.5. Changes over Time

Response frequency to most items repeated in our July 2021 and September 2022 survey waves did not differ significantly (Table 5). However, several measures did change dramatically over time. The proportion of US adults ever knowingly having COVID-19 disease more than quadrupled, from 10% in July 2021 to 46% in September 2022 (p < 0.01). The proportion thinking COVID-19 would be severe if they got it decreased by 7%, from 23% to 15% (p = 0.02). At least 10% fewer respondents believed COVID-19 vaccines important in stopping the spread of infection and getting back to a normal life (p < 0.01). The proportion of respondents not yet up-to-date who reported social media posts making them wary of vaccinating decreased by 14% (p = 0.01). About one-quarter fewer of those not yet up-to-date reported needing more time to think (p = 0.02) or wanting to wait to see what happened to others before vaccinating (p < 0.01), or concerns about immediate side effects (p = 0.04) or allergic reactions (p = 0.01). Although knowing how to register for vaccination increased by 3% over this time (p < 0.01), access to vaccination decreased by 12% (p < 0.01).

Table 5.

Changes in vaccine attitudes between July 2021 and September 2022.

Survey Items July 2021 %
(n = 2525) a
Sept 2022 %
(n = 2546) a
% Dif p-Value b
Affirmative Responses To Survey Items c
Vaccination and Disease Status
Vaccinated against flu within the past year 55.5 51.0 −4.5 0.64
Ever knowingly had COVID disease 9.9 45.6 35.6 <0.01
Reasons to not get a COVID-19 vaccine d
I do not think I am at risk of getting COVID-19 36.3 19.1 −17.2 0.22
I do not think I would get very sick if I got COVID-19 33.4 35.3 1.9 0.27
I do not believe COVID-19 is any worse than the seasonal flu 36.8 33.9 −2.9 0.11
I do not think the COVID-19 vaccines are likely to protect me from COVID-19 49.6 42.9 −6.8 0.23
I am worried about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines 86.7 68.3 −18.4 0.06
I do not like needles 25.8 27.0 1.2 0.76
I do not trust how the vaccine was developed 71.0 59.9 −11.0 0.27
I do not trust the pharmaceutical companies that have developed the vaccine 56.1 54.6 −1.5 0.99
I do not believe that the government is acting in my or my family’s best interest 68.4 57.2 −11.2 0.62
I do not have access to where vaccines are being given 1.3 13.6 12.3 <0.01
I do not know how to register to get a vaccine 13.4 10.1 −3.4 <0.01
I know how to register to get a vaccine but it is too difficult 6.7 5.0 −1.7 0.79
My friends and/or family do not want to get the vaccine 26.9 15.1 −11.8 0.39
I have seen posts on social media that make me wary of the vaccine 46.4 32.7 −13.6 0.01
I want to wait to see what happens to others 70.0 45.2 −24.9 <0.01
I need more time to learn and think more about it 60.3 38.4 −21.9 0.02
Concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines e
How fast COVID-19 vaccines were developed and made available to the public 93.7 82.9 −10.7 0.23
COVID-19 vaccines are new 92.2 75.6 −16.7 0.12
A lot of people who get the vaccine feel tired, achy, and get headaches and fever the next day 82.5 57.8 −24.7 0.04
Some people have bad allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines 93.4 62.2 −31.2 0.01
I am not sure the ingredients in COVID-19 vaccines are safe 93.4 74.1 −19.2 0.10
COVID-19 vaccines are made from mRNA 83.3 54.9 −28.3 0.02
COVID-19 vaccines might change my DNA 54.1 41.9 −12.2 0.57
COVID-19 vaccines might affect my fertility or ability to have children 54.7 42.9 −11.8 0.31
There may be side effects to the COVID-19 vaccine that have not been figured out yet 98.2 86.8 −11.5 0.08
There were not enough people of my race/ethnicity who were a part of the vaccine studies 35.3 37.2 1.9 0.97
They are experimenting on people with the COVID-19 vaccine 80.3 72.2 −8.1 0.68
The drug companies are making a lot of money off of COVID-19 vaccines 73.1 74.8 1.7 0.97
Some COVID-19 vaccines are made from aborted fetuses 62.9 51.9 −10.9 0.38
Confidence in sources for information about COVID-19
My doctor 81.5 85.4 3.8 0.31
My local or state health department 72.9 74.2 1.4 0.95
Scientists and doctors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 72.4 69.4 −3.0 0.80
The Surgeon General 68.1 68.5 0.4 0.99
Scientists and doctors from universities 75.3 71.9 −3.3 0.79
Dr. Anthony Fauci from the National Institutes of Health 61.3 63.7 2.4 0.84
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director 64.7 61.1 −3.6 0.78
Dr. David Satcher, Morehouse School of Medicine, Former CDC Director and Surgeon General 64.7 61.8 −2.9 0.80
My religious leader 39.2 30.5 −8.7 0.09
Other non-medical people in my community that I trust (specify) 31.7 34.7 2.9 0.52
What I see on the news 42.9 33.0 −10.0 0.14
What I see on social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) 12.0 11.2 −0.8 0.63
Agreement With Other COVID-19 Likert Scale Items (For Adults)
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my family members in the next six months 25.1 30.1 5.0 0.38
I am worried I may accidentally spread COVID-19 to my friends, neighbors, or co-workers in the next six months 21.7 27.1 5.4 0.34
If I get COVID-19, I think it will be severe 22.6 15.3 −7.3 0.02
COVID-19 vaccines are important to stopping the spread of infection in the US 87.5 77.0 −10.4 <0.01
COVID-19 vaccines are important to helping the US get back to a normal life 87.4 75.7 −11.6 <0.01
Most or all of my family members have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 61.2 66.7 5.5 0.57
Most or all of my friends have gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 60.9 61.6 0.8 0.45
Agreement With General Vaccine Likert Scale Items
I am confident in the safety of vaccines 84.4 81.7 −2.7 0.21
I do not trust a vaccine unless it has already been safely given to millions of other people 41.8 41.8 −0.1 0.21
I am concerned about some of the ingredients in vaccines 44.7 44.0 −0.7 0.53
Vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are a good fit for me 79.4 72.3 −7.1 0.16
I am concerned that the government and drug companies experiment on people like me 42.1 39.2 −2.9 0.78
The benefits of vaccines are much bigger than their risks 84.3 80.1 −4.3 0.18

Red text indicates survey items assessing negative vaccine attitudes. a Column percentages (of corresponding sample), weighted for national representativeness; b using the Pearson chi-square test (significance level of alpha = 5%); c Likert scale response options (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) were dichotomized to agree/disagree, results for agreement shown; other scale response options were dichotomized to reflect affirmative/negative, results for affirmative shown; d asked only to respondents not yet up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines and not definitely planning to soon become up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines; e asked only to respondents worried or uncertain about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

4. Discussion

Although 85% of the weighted sample reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, fewer than two-thirds (63%) reported being up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines. These rates correspond to CDC data, which estimated that 87% of US adults had received at least one dose as of September 2022 [6], but are substantially higher than the rates reported by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), which estimated that 77% of US adults had received at least one dose and 47% were up-to-date as of September 2022 [27].

The CDC now considers adults “up-to-date” if they have received at least one dose of the updated bivalent COVID-19 vaccine [28,29]. However, at the time of this survey (the beginning of September 2022), “up-to-date” was considered to mean fully vaccinated (with a primary series) and boosted, without specifying that the booster should be the most recent version, since the updated bivalent booster had just been authorized and was not yet widely available [12]. This makes the timing of our data on being “up-to-date” particularly interesting, as it captures the proportion of the US adult population having received a monovalent booster dose just prior to it becoming obsolete. Similarly, we report the intentions, concerns, and reasons for not vaccinating among those who had not yet received any booster by the time the updated bivalent boosters became available.

The CDC no longer reports vaccine coverage for those receiving any booster dose, specifying only those who have received the updated bivalent booster dose. As of 23 March 2023, only about one-fifth (20%) of US adults had received the updated booster and were, thus, “up-to-date”. This highlights the substantial decline in coverage with the bivalent booster compared to the initial monovalent booster.

COVID-19 vaccines will likely continue to be periodically updated to maintain protection against new variants that arise. We must, therefore, continue to regularly characterize those not “up-to-date” and strive to improve upon coverage with updated boosters to maximize protection and reduce suffering.

Although 42% of those not yet up-to-date in our September 2022 survey reported being unlikely to ever get up-to-date, 12% likely would, and 46% were uncertain. This indicates that the majority of those not up-to-date were still considering it at this time. This remained true even after the widespread introduction of the bivalent booster; National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM) data from November and December of 2022 showed that among US adults who finished their COVID-19 primary series, 27% had gotten a bivalent booster, 39% had not yet gotten a bivalent booster but were open to it, 12% were uncertain about getting a bivalent booster, and 21% were reluctant to get a bivalent booster [30]. This demonstrates the continued need to reach those who are vaccinated but not yet up-to-date, the majority of whom have not ruled out receiving the updated booster and, thus, perhaps just need additional information, motivation, or convenience before doing so.

Similar to our previous surveys [21], data from this survey strongly associate being up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines with sociodemographic characteristics, such as younger age, less education, lower income, being a parent, living in the southern or midwestern regions of the US, living in a non-metro area, and identifying as Republican. This suggests continued clustering of under-vaccinated persons both geographically and socially. Communities with low vaccine coverage have fueled outbreaks of other vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles and pertussis, despite relatively high coverage nationally [31], and should be prioritized for vaccination campaigns.

Despite similar vaccine coverage by race/ethnicity, Hispanic and Black Americans not yet up-to-date were more likely than white Americans to remain open to getting up-to-date and report reasons to vaccinate, and less likely than white Americans to report most specific concerns and other reasons not to vaccinate. The most prevalent concerns among those not yet up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccines remained their newness and safety, as well as suspicion of pharmaceutical companies and government. More than half of those uncertain about getting up-to-date believed vaccines to be important to fighting the pandemic, but nearly half believed vaccines unlikely to protect them against new variants. Outreach and messaging should support decision-making among the uncertain by emphasizing the efficacy of updated boosters against currently circulating strains and addressing concerns in an empathetic and comprehensible manner.

Interestingly, perceived COVID-19 disease severity was not associated with being up-to-date. This may be related to perceived vaccine efficacy; that is, those up-to-date on their COVID-19 vaccines felt protected against COVID-19 disease and, thus, expected mild symptoms if they had a breakthrough case. We only measured perceived vaccine efficacy among those not yet up-to-date; however, we found it strongly associated with intentions to get up-to-date, which is a good proxy for being up-to-date.

Many vaccine attitudes did not change between our July 2021 and September 2022 survey waves, but those that did are likely interrelated. As COVID-19 disease prevalence increased, perceived disease severity decreased, which makes sense due to the corresponding increase in natural immunity after infection, as well as the increase in contagiousness but decrease in severity of the Omicron variant, which had emerged in November 2021 and quickly became the primary variant in circulation [32]. Although certain vaccine concerns decreased (such as immediate side effects and allergic reactions), the perceived importance of vaccination in ending the pandemic also decreased, likely due to the cumulative lived experience of knowing people who vaccinated safely yet seeing the pandemic prolonged in spite of vaccination. Worryingly, access to vaccination decreased by 12% in this timeframe. Access also remains inequitable; Black and Hispanic Americans were 2–4 times more likely than white Americans to report not having access to vaccines, not knowing how to register for vaccination, and finding it too difficult to register. Continued, consistent, easy, and equitable access to vaccination should be reprioritized to increase the likelihood of achieving high coverage with updated boosters.

Most (86%) of our survey respondents trusted their own doctor for COVID-19 information, even among those uncertain about getting up-to-date (80%), and without significant differences by race/ethnicity. This is reflected in the literature; doctors have been the most credible and frequently used source of vaccine information for a long time [33], and a recommendation from one’s doctor to vaccinate is a strong predictor of uptake for COVID-19 [21,34,35] and other vaccines [36,37]. Unvaccinated providers are far less likely to recommend vaccinating to their patients and harbor many of the same concerns as the public [35]. This reinforces the need to prioritize distributing updated resources to healthcare providers as new variants and boosters arise, to aid both in their own vaccine decision-making and in their efforts to support their patients’ decision-making.

The main limitation of this study is its cross-sectional nature; it provides a snapshot at a single point in time. However, the survey was well-timed to capture a critical time in the pandemic, measuring vaccination status immediately following authorization of the new bivalent boosters. We also made some interesting comparisons to one of our earlier surveys which also recruited participants from the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Our data are subject to the limitations of self-reporting, and the estimates presented are unadjusted for contextual factors.

Some findings from this study may not be generalizable to countries other than the US. For example, studies have found higher income to be associated with increased vaccine hesitancy in other countries, such as Slovenia [38] and Australia [39], while our study found the opposite. Such divergences by country are likely due both to confounding effects within sociodemographic factors and differences in specific political climates between countries. The political polarization of COVID-19 vaccines in the US has greatly increased vaccine hesitancy among Republicans, who make up higher proportions of the country’s rural low-income populations. Thus, current associations between income and vaccine hesitancy in the US may be largely due to confounding by political affiliation, and the confounding effects of sociodemographic factors on each other may vary by country.

Despite much publicly available survey data assessing attitudes about COVID-19 vaccines, many analyses have not undergone peer review, and their quality varies (especially in terms of internal and external validity). This study is strengthened by the rigorous work put into our survey instrument and analyses, the quality of Ipsos KnowledgePanel as a well-established nationally representative panel, and the oversampling of Black and Hispanic populations to have power for more precise estimates when stratifying or comparing by race/ethnicity.

This precise characterization of vaccine intentions, attitudes, and values of those not yet up-to-date in September 2022 is meant to aid public health authorities at all levels in their efforts to support public vaccine decision-making through communication and outreach programs. Immunization programs should reprioritize convenient and free access to vaccines, especially in communities with low coverage. Messaging should emphasize the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, explain how these vaccines were created so quickly, and remind people of the remaining threat of the disease. Messages may be more trusted coming from sources other than government and industry, such as local healthcare providers. Public health immunization programs must improve the uptake of updated boosters against new variants of COVID-19 to effectively control this evolving virus, with renewed efforts to support the decision-making of those uncertain about getting up-to-date.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm12123932/s1, Table S1: Composition and properties of construct scales, Table S2: Odds ratios for intentions to get up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccinations by vaccine attitudes, trust in the CDC, and sociodemographic characteristics, Figure S1: Inclusion and exclusion of participants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.D. and D.A.S.; methodology, M.Z.D., H.B.S., J.S. and D.A.S.; formal analysis, M.Z.D.; data curation, M.Z.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.D.; writing—review and editing, M.Z.D., H.B.S., J.S. and D.A.S.; supervision, D.A.S.; project administration, M.Z.D., H.B.S. and D.A.S.; funding acquisition, M.Z.D. and D.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work was considered public health surveillance and not human subject research by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent Statement

This work was considered public health surveillance and not human subject research by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Participants were members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel and gave their consent to be surveyed.

Data Availability Statement

Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.

Conflicts of Interest

Matthew Dudley has received research support from Merck. Daniel Salmon has received research support from Merck and serves on advisory boards for Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, and Moderna. Matthew Dudley and Daniel Salmon have received funding from the Vaccination Confidence Fund, which is jointly funded by Facebook and Merck. Holly Schuh served as a (paid) health advisor to the University of Roehampton that provided guidance on recovery-building and future pandemic preparedness (including views on vaccines/vaccination) and understanding citizen engagement in the G7 in 2021–22 (during the presented study). Jana Shaw serves as a consultant to Pfizer on meningococcal B vaccine. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by a research grant from the Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC was not involved in any aspects of the study, including study design, data collection, analyses, and interpretation, writing of the research article, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Food and Drug Administration . FDA Takes Key Action in Fight against COVID-19 by Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for First COVID-19 Vaccine. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Food and Drug Administration . FDA Takes Additional Action in Fight against COVID-19 by Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for Second COVID-19 Vaccine. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Food and Drug Administration . FDA Issues Emergency Use Authorization for Third COVID-19 Vaccine. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oliver S.E., Wallace M., See I., Mbaeyi S., Godfrey M., Hadler S.C., Jatlaoui T.C., Twentyman E., Hughes M.M., Rao A.K., et al. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, December 2021. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022;71:90–95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Food and Drug Administration . Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Emergency Use of Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine, Adjuvanted. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . COVID Data Tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Variants of the Virus. [(accessed on 27 March 2023)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/index.html.
  • 8.Lopez Bernal J., Andrews N., Gower C., Gallagher E., Simmons R., Thelwall S., Stowe J., Tessier E., Groves N., Dabrera G., et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant. & newbsp. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:585–594. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2108891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nasreen S., Chung H., He S., Brown K.A., Gubbay J.B., Buchan S.A., Wilson S.E., Sundaram M.E., Fell D.B., Chen B., et al. Effectiveness of mRNA and ChAdOx1 COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes with variants of concern in Ontario. Nat. Microbiol. 2021;7:379–385. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scobie H.M., Johnson A.G., Suthar A.B., Severson R., Alden N.B., Balter S., Bertolino D., Blythe D., Brady S., Cadwell B., et al. Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status—13 U.S. Jurisdictions, 4 April–17 July 2021. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021 April 4;70:1284–1290. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7037e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Food and Drug Administration . FDA Authorizes Booster Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Certain Populations. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Food and Drug Administration . Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech Bivalent COVID-19 Vaccines for Use as a Booster Dose. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dudley M.Z., Bernier R., Brewer J., Salmon D.A. Walking the Tightrope: Reevaluating science communication in the era of COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine. 2021;39:5453–5455. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.World Health Organization . Pandemic Fatigue—Reinvigorating the Public to Prevent COVID-19: Policy Framework for Supporting Pandemic Prevention and Management. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Salmon D.A., Dudley M.Z., Glanz J.M., Omer S.B. Vaccine hesitancy: Causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine. 2015;33((Suppl. S4)):D66–D71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dudley M.Z., Limaye R.J., Omer S.B., O’leary S.T., Ellingson M., Spina C.I., Brewer S.E., Chamberlain A.T., Bednarczyk R.A., Malik F., et al. Characterizing the vaccine knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions of pregnant women in Georgia and Colorado. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020;16:1109–1117. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1717130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dudley M.Z., Limaye R.J., Salmon D.A., Omer S.B., O’leary S.T., Ellingson M.K., Spina C.I., Brewer S.E., Bednarczyk R.A., Malik F., et al. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Vaccine Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions. Public Health Rep. 2021;136:699–709. doi: 10.1177/0033354920974660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freed G.L., Clark S.J., Butchart A.T., Singer D.C., Davis M.M. Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics. 2010;125:654–659. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Salmon D.A., Dudley M.Z., Brewer J., Kan L., Gerber J.E., Budigan H., Proveaux T.M., Bernier R., Rimal R., Schwartz B. COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, values and intentions among United States adults prior to emergency use authorization. Vaccine. 2021;39:2698–2711. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zapf A.J., Schuh H., Rimal R., Harvey S.A., Shaw J., Balgobin K., Salmon D.A. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in the General Population and the Effect of Different Framing Messages for a Brief Video on Intentions to Get Vaccinated among Unvaccinated Individuals in the United States during July 2021. Available at Social Sciences Research Network (SSRN) [(accessed on 15 March 2023)]. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4152703. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Dudley M.Z., Schwartz B., Brewer J., Kan L., Bernier R., Gerber J.E., Ni H.B., Proveaux T.M., Rimal R.N., Salmon D.A. COVID-19 Vaccination Status, Attitudes, and Values among US Adults in September 2021. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:3734. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ipsos. KnowledgePanel. [(accessed on 20 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/solutions/public-affairs/knowledgepanel.
  • 23.Holroyd T.A., Limaye R.J., Gerber J.E., Rimal R.N., Musci R.J., Brewer J., Sutherland A., Blunt M., Geller G., Salmon D.A. Development of a Scale to Measure Trust in Public Health Authorities: Prevalence of Trust and Association with Vaccination. J. Health Commun. 2021;26:272–280. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1927259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rosenstock I.M. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ. Monogr. 1974;2:328–335. doi: 10.1177/109019817400200403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kumar S., Quinn S.C., Kim K.H., Musa D., Hilyard K.M., Freimuth V.S. The Social Ecological Model as a Framework for Determinants of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Uptake in the United States. Health Educ. Behav. 2011;39:229–243. doi: 10.1177/1090198111415105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.StataCorp LLC STATA. [(accessed on 20 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.stata.com/
  • 27.Sparks G., Lopes L., Hamel L., Montero A., Presiado M., Brodie M. KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: September 2022. Kaiser Family Foundation; Oakland, CA, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Stay Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines Including Boosters. [(accessed on 2 May 2023)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html.
  • 29.Food and Drug Administration . Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Changes to Simplify Use of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu P.-J., Zhou T., Santibanez T.A., Jain A., Black C.L., Srivastav A., Hung M.-C., Kriss J.L., Schorpp S., Yankey D., et al. COVID-19 Bivalent Booster Vaccination Coverage and Intent to Receive Booster Vaccination Among Adolescents and Adults—United States, November–December 2022. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023;72:190–198. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7207a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Phadke V.K., Bednarczyk R., Salmon D., Omer S.B. Association Between Vaccine Refusal and Vaccine-Preventable Diseases in the United States: A Review of Measles and Pertussis. JAMA. 2016;315:1149–1158. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Omicron Variant: What You Need to Know. [(accessed on 13 December 2021)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/omicron-variant.html.
  • 33.Dudley M.Z., A Halsey N., Omer S.B., Orenstein W.A., O’Leary S.T., Limaye R.J., A Salmon D. The state of vaccine safety science: systematic reviews of the evidence. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:e80–e89. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30130-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nguyen K.H., Yankey D., Lu P.-J., Kriss J.L., Brewer N.T., Razzaghi H., Meghani M., Manns B.J., Lee J.T., Singleton J.A. Report of Health Care Provider Recommendation for COVID-19 Vaccination Among Adults, by Recipient COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Attitudes—United States, April–September 2021. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021;70:1723–1730. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7050a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dudley M.Z., Schuh H.B., Shaw J., Rimal R.N., Harvey S.A., Balgobin K.R., Zapf A.J., Salmon D.A. COVID-19 vaccination among different types of US Healthcare Personnel. Vaccine. 2023;41:1471–1479. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Limaye R.J., Opel D.J., Dempsey A., Ellingson M., Spina C., Omer S.B., Dudley M.Z., Salmon D.A., O’Leary S.T. Communicating with Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Narrative Review. Acad. Pediatr. 2021;21:S24–S29. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ellingson M., Dudley M.Z., Limaye R.J., Salmon D.A., O’leary S.T., Omer S.B. Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2019;18:191–204. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1562907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kirbiš A. The Impact of Socioeconomic Status, Perceived Threat and Healthism on Vaccine Hesitancy. Sustainability. 2023;15:6107. doi: 10.3390/su15076107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Swaney S.E., Burns S. Exploring reasons for vaccine-hesitancy among higher-SES parents in Perth, Western Australia. Health Promot. J. Aust. Off. J. Aust. Assoc. Health Promot. Prof. 2018;30:143–152. doi: 10.1002/hpja.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES