Table 1.
Type of Study | Molecule | N° of Patients | Time of Follow-Up | Main Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calapkulu et al., 2019 [54] | Retrospective study | Dapaglifozin 10 mg | 31 patients | 3 and 6 months | At three months:
|
Bays et al., 2017 [55] | Post-hoc analysis | Dapaglifozin 10 mg | 4401 patients | 6 months | ↑ LDL ↑ HDL ↑ total cholesterol ↓ triglycerides |
Matthaei et al., 2015 [56] | Phase 3b study | Dapaglifozin 10 mg | 219 patients | 6 months | ↑ LDL ↑ HDL ↑ total cholesterol |
Hayashi et al., 2017 [57] | Prospective study | Dapaglifozin 10 mg | 80 patients | 3 months | ↑ LDL (0.5%) ↑ HDL (10.5%) ↑ total cholesterol (2.5%) ↓ triglycerides (12.4%) |
Yanai et al., 2017 [58] | Retrospective study | Dapaglifozin 10 mg | 249 patients (69 treated with dapaglifozin) |
3 and 6 months | At three months: non-significant changes At six months:
|
Zinman et al., 2015 [59] | Randomized controlled trial | Empaglifozin 10 or 25 mg | 7028 patients | 3 years | ↑ LDL ↓ HDL |
Tikkanen et al., 2015 [60] | Phase 3 study | Empaglifozin 10 or 25 mg | 825 patients | 14 weeks | With 10 mg:
|
Sánchez-García et al., 2020 [45] | Meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials | Empaglifozin 10 or 25 mg AND Canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg |
24,782 patients | Variable | ↑ LDL ↑ HDL ↑ total cholesterol ↓ triglycerides |
Liakos et al., 2014 [61] | Meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials | Empaglifozin 10 or 25 mg | 6203 patients | Variable | ↑ LDL (4.5–6.5%) |
Neal et al., 2014 [62] | Randomized controlled trial | Canaglifozin 100 or 300 mg | 10,142 patients | Up to 78 weeks | ↑ LDL ↑ HDL |
Bode et al., 2015 [63] | Phase 3 study | Canaglifozin 100 or 300 mg | 714 patients | 104 weeks | ↑ LDL ↑ HDL ↓ triglycerides |
Abbreviations: HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein. ↑ = raised. ↓ = reduced.