Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 4;37(3):255–265. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-00988-8

Table 2.

Efficacy of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in a phase II/III trial

Endpoint [37] RIM (n = 348) PL (n = 347) LSM between-group difference (95% CI)
Change from BL in mean no. of MMDs during wks 9–12a − 4.3** − 3.5 − 0.8 (− 1.5 to − 0.2)
≥ 50% reduction in mean no. of moderate/severe MMDs during wks 9–12 (% pts) 49* 41 8 (0 to 15)
Change from BL in mean no. of MMDs during wks 1–12 − 3.6** − 2.7 − 0.8 (− 1.3 to − 0.3)
Mean no. of rescue medication days/month during wks 9–12 3.7 4.0 − 0.2 (− 0.8 to 0.3)
Change from BL in mean no. of MMDs during wks 1–4 − 2.9†† − 1.7 − 1.2 (− 1.7 to − 0.6)
Change from BL in MSQ role function (restrictive domain score) at wk 12b 18.0 14.6 3.5 (0.2 to 6.7)
Change from BL in MIDAS total score at wk 12b − 11.8 − 11.7 − 0.1 (− 4.7 to 4.5)

Efficacy analyses were performed in the efficacy-evaluable population

BL baseline, LSM least squares mean, MIDAS Migraine Disability Assessment, MMDs monthly migraine days, MSQ Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, PL placebo, pts patients, RIM rimegepant, wk(s) week(s)

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs PL; p < 0.05, ††p < 0.0001 (nominal) vs PL

aPrimary endpoint

bAssessed in 269 RIM and 266 PL pts who completed the questionnaire within the prespecified analysis window (wks 10–13)