Table 1.

Photocatalytic activity comparison of the LaVO₄ photocatalyst with some documented materials.

Catalyst	contaminant examined	Synthesis Method	Operating Conditions (C0; Light Source)	Degradation Efficiency; Time	Ref
m-LaVO4	MB	Solventless	10−5 M, ---	82.2%, 90 min	[73]
m-LaVO4	MB	hydrothermal	1.5 10−5 M, 400 W metal halide lamp (λ = 510 nm)	91%, 60min	[74]
m-LaVO4/BiOBr	RhB	hydrothermal	3.1 10−5 M, 500 W Xe lamp	83.37%, 60min	[75]
t-LaVO4/g-C3N4	RhB	hydrothermal	3.1 10−5 M, 350 W Xe lamp	99%, 90min	[66]
CNTs/LaVO4	sulfamethazine	hydrothermal	10 10−5 M, 400 W metal halide lamp	70%, 90min	[76]
LaVO4/TiO2	Benzene	Sol-gel	3.2 M, 500 W Xe-arc lamp	57%, 600min	[77]
t-LaVO4	MB	Ambient Synthesis	3.1 10−5 M, Philips lamps (300 W)	98%, 90min	This study