Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 14;13(6):996. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060996

Table 4.

Evaluation of outcomes.

Study Number HR/OR Particularities (Cases vs. Controls)
1 [23] Naghshineh et al. 0.26
(p = 0.105)
Preterm labor—6.0% vs. 24.3% (p = 0.006)
2 [24] Sablock et al. 4.60 *
(p < 0.001)
Preterm labor—8.3% vs. 21.1% (p = 0.080)
APGAR < 7—1.1% vs. 13.0% (p < 0.001)
Vitamin D in cord blood—22.7 vs. 17.3 (p < 0.001)
3 [25] Mirzakhani et al. 0.28
(p = 0.040)
Vitamin D levels of 30 ng/mL or higher at trial entry and in late pregnancy were associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia
4 [26] Sasan et al. 1.94 *
(p < 0.001)
24 h proteinuria (mg/cc) 132.2 vs. 154.9
BMI > 30 kg/m2—18.6% vs. 29.6%
5 [27] Dahma et al. 2.52 *
(p < 0.001)
Parity (>2) carried a 1.89 higher risk for preeclampsia

*—reference for patients with insufficient vitamin D levels; NR—not reported; cases—received vitamin D, controls—did not receive vitamin D supplementation; HDL—High-density lipoprotein; APGAR – activity, pulse, grimace, appearance, and respiration; BMI—body mass index.