Table 3.
Descriptive statistics and ANOVA of UF (“upper face”) and ULF (“upper and lower face”).
| t0c1 | t1c1 | t2c1 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | |
| BDI-UF | |||||||||||||||
| N | 26 | 24 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mean | 29.3 | 22.7 | 19.4 | 16.9 | 11.9 | 15.1 | 29.7 | 24.8 | 17 | 21.5 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 8 |
| SD | 11.1 | 8.9 | 9.6 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.7 | 12.2 | 6.4 | 14.1 | / | / | / | |
| F(1.4,16.7) = 9,79, p = 0.003, ηp2 = 0.449; N = 13 | |||||||||||||||
| t0c1 | t1c1 | t2c1 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | t0 | t1 | t2 | |
| BDI-ULF | |||||||||||||||
| N | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Mean | 30.4 | 17.9 | 15.8 | 22.5 | 8 | 11.7 | 19 | 13 | 10.3 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 25 |
| SD | 13.6 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 12 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 11.9 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 9.9 | 7.1 | / |
| F(2,14) = 6,74, p = 0.009, ηp2 = 0.490; N = 8 | |||||||||||||||
Treatment results were compared using rmANOVA. Missing data were deleted listwise. Due to violations of the sphericity assumption, a Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied to the BDI cycle 1 analysis. Cycles 2 to 5 were not analyzed due to low case count.