Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 12;15(12):2722. doi: 10.3390/nu15122722

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses examining specific characteristics and factors related to vitamin D in studies incorporated in the meta-meta-analysis.

Analysis Model Number of Reports (n) Effect Size (ES) (OR or RR) 95% CI p Value I 2 p Value Intercept Tau (t) p Value
Vitamin D intake and cancer risk *
Total cancer Fixed 7 0.99 ** 0.97–1.01 0.300 0.00 0.983 0.37 0.72 0.506
Colorectal carcinoma Random 6 0.89 ** 0.83–0.96 0.002 79.4 <0.001 −2.11 −1.70 0.164
Lung cancer Fixed 3 0.88 ** 0.83–0.94 <0.001 0.00 0.817 −0.72 −0.59 0.658
RCTs *** Fixed 8 0.99 ** 0.97–1.01 0.320 0.00 0.988 0.49 1.35 0.227
Observational Random 14 0.90 ** 0.86–0.95 <0.001 68.43 <0.001 −1.09 −1.51 0.156
Serum 25 (OH)D levels and cancer risk *
Colorectal carcinoma Fixed 4 0.65 ** 0.60–0.70 <0.001 48.4 0.121 3.23 1.21 0.351
Lung cancer Random 3 0.89 ** 0.75–1.05 0.178 85.84 0.001 −4.32 −0.68 0.619
Vitamin D intake and cancer related mortality *
Total cancer Fixed 7 0.89 **** 0.85–0.93 <0.001 0.00 0.929 0.77 0.98 0.372
RCTs *** Fixed 7 0.89 **** 0.85–0.93 <0.001 0.00 0.929 0.77 0.98 0.372

OR odds ratio, ES effect size, RR risk ratio, N/R not reported, RCTs randomized controlled trials, N/A not available or missing data, CI confidence interval, * Meta-meta-analysis was not conducted for types of cancer with fewer than three reports ** OR, *** studies containing only RCTs were included, studies with a combination of other study types and RCTs were excluded, **** RR.