Table 2.
Preclinical Model | Nanoformulation (as Reported by the Authors) |
Antineoplastic Drug/Nutraceutic enclosed in One Nanoformulation or Administered Separately | PheC (Non-Flavonoid) in the Nanoformulation | Anticancer Effect(s) of the Nanoformulation (or Combination of Formulations) Respect to the Enclosed Free Compounds | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro: DOX-resistant HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells and DOX-resistant K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells. In vivo: DOX-resistant HL-60 cells subcutaneously injected in Balb/c nude mice. Drugs i.v. injected every 3 days for 7 times. |
Lipid-polymeric hybrid NPs consisting in: HA conjugated with PEG-DSPE co-loading DOX and GA. Size: 165.7 ± 4.6 nm |
DOX | GA (Phenolic acid) |
In vitro: ↓Cell viability ↓ IC50 (maximally at 2:1 DOX/GA ratio) In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume ↓ Decrease in body weight |
[55] |
In vitro: Human MCF-7 and CAL-51 breast cancer cell lines. | Liquid crystalline NPs (LCNPs) enclosing Tamoxifen plus RES and coated with multiple layers of chitosan and HA. Size: about 217 nm | TAM | RES (Stilbene) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability *; ↑ Apoptosis * In vivo: No change in body weight during treatment |
[61] |
In vitro: 4T1 murine breast cancer cells |
RES-loaded Zein-SHA NPs. Average size: about 152.13 nm |
None | RES (Stilbene) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability ↓ IC50 |
[62] |
In vitro: MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells In vivo: subcutaneous inoculation of MDA-MB-231 cells in the abdomen of nude mice. Drugs injected into the tumors as they reached a volume of about 80 mm3. |
Injectable Res-Cx-HA hydrogel Size: Non reported |
None | Resveratrol (RES) (Stilbene) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; In vivo: Tumor tissue inject with the Hydrogel: ↑ necrosis rate of tumor tissue; ↓ Angiogenesis |
[63] |
In vitro: CT26 colon cancer cell line; In vivo: CT26 cells xenografted in the flank of Balb/c nude mice. Drugs i.v. injected every day for 2 weeks. |
HA-Zein-CUR NG Size: from 200–250 nm. |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; ↑ Apoptosis In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume and weight |
[64] |
In vitro: MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells |
CDF loaded in HA-SMA-TPGS nanomicelles. Average size: 129.4 nm |
None | CDF (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; ↑ Apoptosis ↑ PTEN (pro-apoptotic) and ↓ NF-kB (tumorigenic) expression |
[65] |
In vitro: MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. In vivo: Swiss albino mice injected with Erlich Ascites Carcinoma. Drugs i.v. injected after 10 days every 2 days for 2 weeks. |
HA-tagged mesoporous silica NPs loaded with CUR. Average size: 161.3 nm |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; ↓ in-vitro cellular migration; ↑ Apoptosis; Cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume and tumor mass |
[66] |
In vitro: MCF-7 cells breast cancer cells and breast cancer stem cells. In vivo: MCF-7 cells injected in nude mice. Drugs i.v. injected as tumors reached 400 mm3 |
Icariin and CUR co-encapsulated in polymeric micelles based on pH-sensitive hydrazone bond, FA and biotin-conjugated HA. Size: 162.7 ± 5 nm. |
Icariin | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; ↓ Invasion ability (Transwell assay) In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume |
[67] |
In vitro: A549 lung carcinoma cells and RAW264.7 cells. In vivo: A549 cells trasplanted in mice. Drugs i.v. injected as the tumor reached an appropriate size. |
QU-dithiodipropionic acid-oligomeric HA-mannose-ferulic acid self-assembled and encapsulating CUR and Baicalin. Size: 121.0 ± 15 nm |
Baicalin | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume; ↓ Decrease in body weight |
[68] |
In vitro: MG-63 osteosarcoma cells In vivo: MG-63 cells injected into the right tibia of nude mice; at 12 days, drugs injected every 2 days for 20 days. |
ALN-HA-C18 loading CUR. Size: 118 ± 3.6 nm |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability; In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume; |
[69] |
In vitro: Human SKOV3 and SKOV3-TR30 ovarian cancer cells (multi-drug resistant); In vivo: SKOV3 cells subcutaneously xenografted. Drugs i.v. injected as tumor reached 200 mm3. |
HA-coated PEI-SA copolymer co-encapsulating PTX and CUR. Average Size: 187.77 nm |
PTX | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ IC50 (in both the cells) ↓ Cell invasiveness (of both cells) In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume |
[70] |
In vitro: LX-2 human hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and SMMC-7721 human hepatocarcinoma cells (HCCs). In vivo: H22 mouse HCCs, mouse HSCs and SP subcutaneously injected into the right flank of mice. Drugs i.v. injected 7 times as tumors reached 150 mm3. |
HA and glycyrrhetinic acid-modified liposomes co-delivering aprepitant and CUR. Size: 117.40 ± 0.62 |
APR | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability of LX-2 cells and of SP-treated LX-2 + HCCs co-culture; ↓ Cell migration in HCCs and in SP-treated LX-2 + HCCs co-culture In vivo: ↓ Tumor volume |
[71] |
In vitro: HCT116, HCT8, and HT29 colon cancer cells. | Zein-HA NPs enclosing CUR. Average size: about 300 nm |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability of all cancer cell and IC50 with Zein-HA NPs (respect to CUR alone or to all other NPs) | [72] |
In vitro: Human HCCs (BEL-7402), human-derived HSCs (LX-2), mouse HCCs (H22), and mouse HSCs (mHSCs); In vivo: H22+mHSCs injected in the flank of Balb/c mice. Drugs i.v. injected as tumors reached 200 mm3. |
Glycyrrhetinic acid- and HA-modified liposomes co-delivering Berberine and CUR. Size: 159.39 ± 3.16 nm |
Berberine | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cell viability of BEL-7402 cells and co-cultured BEL-7402+LX- cells; In vivo: ↓Tumor volume in H22+m-HSC tumor-bearing mice model |
[73] |
In vitro: Human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MDA). |
HA- and riboflavin-coated transition metals-based nanoplatforms enclosing CUR. Average size: about 70 nm |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
In vitro: ↓ Cancer cell viability (vs. NPs not containing CUR, not vs. CUR alone) |
[74] |
In vitro: human HT-29 and mouse CT-26 colon cancer cells |
Lactoferrin-EGCG-NP coated with HA and loading CUR. Average size: 144.7 nm |
None | CUR (Curcuminoid) |
↓ Cancer cell viability ↑ Apoptosis |
[75] |
ALN-HA-C18: Alendronate-HA-octadecanoic acid; APR: aprepitant; CD/QU: 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin/Quercetin; CDF: 3,4-difluorobenzylidene diferuloylmethane; CUR: curcumin; DMAEP: 2,2-dimethacroyloxy-1-ethoxypropane; EGCG: epigallocatechin-3-gallate; FA: folic acid; GA: gallic acid; HA: hyaluronic acid; HA-Zein-CUR NG: HA cross-linked zein nanogel including curcumin; HCD-A: 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin acrylate; MDR: multidrug resistant; ND: not detected; NPs: nanoparticles; PEG-DSPE: polyethylene glycol-distearoyl phosphoethanolamine; PEI-SA: polyethylenimine and stearic acid; PTX: paclitaxel; QU: Quercetin; RES: resveratrol; Res-Cx-HA: RES-loaded click-crosslinked HA; SHA: low-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate); SMA: styrene maleic anhydrase polymer; SP: substance P; TAM: tamoxifen; TPGS: Tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate. *: In this case, the comparison was made only between cells treated or not with the nanosystem.