Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;15(6):1634. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061634

Table 2.

Film results, three samples analyzed for each test (n = 3).

Sample Thickness
mm
Young’s Modulus
MPa
Tensile Strength
MPa
Swelling
%
Loss by Solubilization
%
Occlusive Effects
%
LG 0.096 ± 0.007 23.9 ± 7.2 1.8 ± 0.3 - - 88.58 ± 1.27
LG MAS 0.101 ± 0.005 164.3 ± 26.6 2.4 ± 0.2 - - 86.43 ± 0.48
LGL 4.4 0.097 ± 0.005 27.6 ± 6.6 0.4 ± 0.2 442.87 ± 30.65 14.55 ± 2.57 77.23 ± 3.32
LGL 4.4 MAS 0.102 ± 0.012 101.7 ± 20.3 1.6 ± 0.8 171.66 ± 21.20 19.17 ± 0.39 80.73 ± 1.12
LGL 6.6 0.102 ± 0.007 18.7 ± 3.8 0.9 ± 0.1 523.74 ± 43.61 8.28 ± 1.53 70.33 ± 1.98
LGL 6.6 MAS 0.103 ± 0.010 72.7 ± 9.8 2.9 ± 0.5 277.17 ± 40.29 9.39 ± 0.64 81.11 ± 0.68
LGL 0.111 ± 0.009 4.7 ± 0.5 4.7 ± 0.8 672.46 ± 24.26 6.84 ± 0.87 69.56 ± 3.40
LGL MAS 0.113 ± 0.007 12.5 ± 2.7 7.1 ± 0.6 289.06 ± 7.73 6.85 ± 0.92 79.37 ± 1.00