Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 28;23:222. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02851-y

Table 3.

Comparison of HCC associated factors in patients with MAFLD, NAFLD, and hepatitis C

P value
Variables HCV (n = 1154) MAFLD (n = 222) NAFLD (n = 101) HCV vs MAFLD HCV vs NAFLD MAFLD vs NAFLD
AFP (ng/mL) 20.7 (0.5–538,100) 8.8 (1.0–1,089,700) 9.5 (1.0–173,820) < 0.001 0.001 0.996
DCP (mAU/mL) 63 (3.3–1,160,000) 163 (11–593,860) 235 (13–593,860) < 0.001  < 0.001 0.73
Number of tumors
 1 609 (53) 118 (53) 58 (57) 0.942 0.406 0.547
 2,3 294 (25) 53 (24) 24 (25) 0.673 0.811 1
 4–9 95 (8) 18 (8) 6 (6) 1 0.566 0.648
 10- 156 (14) 33 (15) 13 (13) 0.595 1 0.732
Maximum tumor size (mm)
  < 20 407 (35) 38 (17) 14 (14) < 0.001  < 0.001 0.516
 20–100 710(62) 164 (74) 76 (75) < 0.001 0.007 0.891
 100 <  37 (3) 20 (9) 11 (11) < 0.001  < 0.001 0.684
Clinical stage
 Stage II ≤  848 (73) 194 (87) 86 (85) < 0.001 0.009 0.599
 Stage III ≤  455 (39) 109 (49) 49 (49) 0.009 0.09 1
 Stage IV ≤  176 (15) 40 (18) 16 (16) 0.314 0.89 0.752

Data are expressed as medians with ranges for continuous variables and as total numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Differences between the groups are investigated using Fisher’s exact test for categorial variables or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables

AFP alpha-fetoprotein, DCP des-γ-carboxy prothrombin