Table 3.

Latent mediation model estimation results

		βstandardized	βunstandardized	95% CI
Model 1
FSRL on	SE	0.54	1.22	[0.76, 1.73]	***
	COI_T	0.31	0.42	[0.18, 0.70]	**
SE on	COI_T	0.72	0.43	[0.30, 0.59]	***
Indirect Effect		–	0.53	[0.36, 0.74]	*
R squared for FSRL						0.62
Model 2
FSRL on	SE	0.50	1.15	[0.77, 1.57]	***
	COI_S	0.42	0.46	[0.30, 0.63]	***
SE on	COI_S	0.61	0.29	[0.20, 0.38]	***
Indirect Effect		–	0.33	[0.22, 0.47]	*
R squared for FSRL						0.68
Model 3
FSRL on	SE	0.15	0.35	[-0.02, 0.69]	#
	COI_C	0.82	1.00	[0.80, 1.24]	***
SE on	COI_C	0.73	0.38	[0.28, 0.52]	***
Indirect Effect		–	0.13	[-0.004, 0.26]	#
R squared for FSRL						0.88
	Chi-square	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	SRMR
Model 1	351.01	162	0.92	0.91	0.08	0.07
Model 2	362.46	161	0.92	0.91	0.08	0.08
Model 3	325.26	144	0.93	0.91	0.08	0.06

Note. FSRL = Favorability of Sustained Remote Learning, SE = Self-Efficacy, COI_T = Teaching Presence, COI_S = Social Presence, COI_C = Cognitive Presence

^* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001. # p < .10