Table 2.
Multiple logistic regression analysis for the estimation of the association between explanatory variables and binary outcome.
Variable | Category | Total | Estimated ± S.E | Adjusted OR (95% Cl) |
p- Values |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequate knowledge | |||||||
Husbandry
practice |
Yes | No | |||||
Mixed practice | 84 | 44 | 128 | −0.346 ± 0.15 | Reference | <0.001 | |
Stall feeding | 61 | 26 | 87 | 1.0387 ± 0.26 | 2.7 (1.46–4.45) | ||
Intercept | 0.167 ± 0.213 | ||||||
Favorable attitude | Yes | No | |||||
Husbandry
practice |
Mixed practice | 88 | 52 | 140 | Reference | 0.001 | |
Stall feeding | 80 | 20 | 100 | 0.954 ± 0.31 | 1.8 (1.08–3.43) | ||
Common animal health problems |
Pathogens
(Favorable attitude) |
Yes | No | Total | Reference | 0.001 | |
Mastitis | 88 | 48 | 136 | 1.99 (0.09–2.2) | 0.001 | ||
Endoparasitism | 104 | 58 | 162 | 0.7 (0.01–1.5) | 0.94 | ||
Metabolic diseases | 118 | 108 | 226 | 0.4 (0.02–1.25) | 0.99 | ||
Bacterial diseases | 118 | 98 | 216 | 1.68 (0.05–1.9) | 0.2 | ||
Tick infestation | 88 | 28 | 116 | 2.5 (1.47–4.06) | <0.05 | ||
Viral diseases | 97 | 31 | 128 | 1.88 (1.09–2.9) | 0.05 | ||
Plant poisoning | 189 | 45 | 234 | 1.2 (1.07–2.78) | >0.1 |
p < 0.05 = significant