Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 19;23(12):5702. doi: 10.3390/s23125702

Table 6.

Comparison results between the proposed method and single-stage object detectors.

Model AP AP50 AP75 APS APM APL FPS
M2Det [79] 59.3 69.5 63.7 51.4 58.6 74.8 26.3
FSAF [81] 59.6 69.8 63.9 51.7 59.3 75.2 22.7
RFBNet [80] 63.5 69.4 64.3 52.5 60.2 73.9 25
EfficientDet [65] 71.8 78.3 74.6 63.7 70.4 83.8 28.5
NAS-FPN [83] 62.4 72.1 66.5 54.3 61.8 76.3 20.4
SSD [32] 64.5 72.6 66.3 55.8 64.7 77.2 82.6
RefineDet [82] 69.2 76.5 71.8 60.9 67.6 82.4 61.5
DeepSmoke [84] 72.3 79.7 75.4 64.6 71.5 86.2 35.4
RetinaNet [85] 66.4 73.8 68.2 57.6 64.3 69.7 67.2
YOLOv3 [29] 68.6 76.3 69.5 60.1 67.8 79.6 31.8
YOLOv4 [86] 70.7 78.5 72.6 61.4 69.2 82.8 35.6
YOLOv5 [87] 71.9 79.2 73.4 63.8 70.5 84.5 156
YOLOv7 [61] 74.8 82.5 75.4 67.2 73.6 87.3 161
The proposed 78.6 86.4 81.7 70.3 77.2 91.5 153